this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2025
543 points (98.2% liked)

News

33025 readers
4008 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 249 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Furthermore, Variety claims that Ellison’s goal is to turn Paramount into a MAGA-friendly environment, with content in the TV and movie divisions expected to be more “America-centric” and geared toward “the middle of the country.”

RIP any future Star Trek property.

[–] AreaKode@lemmy.world 148 points 1 day ago (2 children)

"OMG, when did Star Trek get so political?!"

Um... 1966.

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 22 points 1 day ago

So hilarious and so apt... I will absolutely laugh at the idea of, well what's effectively been a socialist utopia for the vast majority of contexts in it, and the show that broke the interracial kiss barrier. (on top of inter species/galaxy ones... but obviously far more shocking at the time that a white guy kissed a black woman, than a white guy sleeping with a bunch of green aliens.

[–] TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Political in the non-conservative sense, mind you.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CityPop@lemmy.today 39 points 1 day ago (3 children)

America-centric?

Mother fucker it’s already America-centric, just look at the space Christian angels episodes of discovery to see how American it is.

Oh well, more Americans shooting themselves in the foot for foreign media to step in and replace them. Guess this is the century of China if America is giving up.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] wiccan2@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I reckon we could get 4 seasons into a Terran Empire based series before the MAGAs figure out they're being made fun of.

[–] pheonixdown@sh.itjust.works 53 points 1 day ago

You could get away with a Starship Troopers Star Trek Terran Empire series literally forever, The Colbert Report ran 11 seasons and people still think it existed to balance out the liberal bias of The Daily Show.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Star Trek: Ferenginar will probably be on the list to be made and the pilot episode will be called Make Fereginar Great Again.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (3 children)

MAGA would see the Ferengi aversion to war, xenophobia, and genocide as "too woke".

[–] SereneSadie@lemmy.myserv.one 20 points 1 day ago

The Ferengi actually know how to run a functioning economy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Followed by Star Trek: Lobes

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 9 points 16 hours ago

Star Trek: The Final Front Ear

[–] ZeroPoke@fedia.io 16 points 1 day ago

My first thought when reading that as well.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 6 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (12 children)

RIP any future Star Trek property.

I'm sure they will find new ways to try to reboot it, completely stripped of any social commentary or social thought experiments, devoid of all optimism and inspiration for what our species can become. Probably like, another retelling of a plucky crew getting into space battles with generic, non-stereotyped-but-kinda alien terrorists who don't have relatable reasons for being bad guys.

It won't have heady concepts and wild ideas about how civilizations can develop and what humans can become, but that's okay because it will have a roguish captain who likes to break the rules and a strict, by-the-book 1st officer that he has sexual tension with.

[–] balance8873@lemmy.myserv.one 10 points 14 hours ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 146 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Seeing that list of stars, I didn't even need to open the article to see if Paramount was just conflating anti-genocide with anti-semitic.

They are, in case it wasn't immediately clear.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 18 points 16 hours ago

They are, in case it wasn’t immediately clear.

Basically, my eyeballs just slide off the word "antisemitism" like it's fucking mental Teflon at this point.

Good fucking job Israel, we spent nearly a century committing our entire civilization to stamping out ideas like antisemitism and bigotry against ethnic groups, and you just dragged us back to the start.

[–] pinheadednightmare@lemmy.world 94 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Well, I just canceled my paramount+

[–] Botzo@lemmy.world 42 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Same.

We're quickly spiraling into a Star Trek evil timeline origin.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 16 points 1 day ago

After what they did to Halo, I canceled mine ages ago.

[–] CheesyFingers@piefed.social 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

How do i boycott that from which i don't currently partake.

[–] MycelialMass@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Pirate their stuff and leave bad reviews?

[–] stephen01king@piefed.zip 8 points 17 hours ago

By spreading the word about the boycott.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] THB@lemmy.world 76 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Sounds like we need a Paramount boycott

[–] TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I want to, but I was already avoiding them!

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

I switch around a lot and was considering getting it for a month but then the Colbert thing happened and now this? Never again.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Herr_S_aus_H@lemmy.zip 58 points 12 hours ago

And Mel Gibson is not on the list. That fact alone shows that this list has nothing to do with antisemitism.

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 42 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Boycott, divest, sanction. Paramount about to get the Disney treatment.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MerrySkeptic@sh.itjust.works 38 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Soon to be rebranded as Paramaga, to cater to "the middle"

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 7 points 16 hours ago

"Coming soon to Paramount+, a unique look at Hitler: A tyrant? Yes, but also an artist and dog lover, let us explore the middle side of history this fall!"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 29 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

And by "antisemitic", they are still going by the hilariously outdated notion that maybe last held sway in the 90s, and that means "not sufficiently subservient to just whatever the fuck Israel wants to do"?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] itisileclerk@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago

MAGA and Jewish space lasers on the same side. I guess they are that stupid.

[–] ProfThadBach@lemmy.world 23 points 15 hours ago (5 children)

Oh man. Star Trek is the only tv show I watch. I guess it is time to sail the high seas.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] desertdruid@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 8 hours ago (4 children)

No wonder South Park is trying to speedrun their contract with Paramount

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What are the odds that Mel Gibson isn't on that list

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Is that a bad thing? As in, there are some good actors on that list which won't be making MAGA-friendly films at Paramount.

[–] thelivefive@startrek.website 15 points 1 day ago

Oh that would be tough if you were an actor who thinks children deserve to live.

[–] Grizzlyboy@lemmy.zip 14 points 14 hours ago

Good thing I’d rather blacklist paramount!

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 14 points 15 hours ago

Blacklists are the hallmarks of fascism.

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 13 points 8 hours ago

Here is the twist, they don't have the actually anti-semitist people there because definition of this word completely warped thanks to Netanyahu and zionist lobbies. Bask in the glory of your stupidity.

[–] FinishingDutch@lemmy.world 12 points 23 hours ago

It’s certainly not out of the realm of possibility, since Hollywood loves to blacklist folks in general for opinions outside work. But to outright claim X, Y or Z won’t be working at Paramount seems a bit of a stretch.

There’s a lot of wiggle room in that article. It’s reporting on ‘sources told Variety’ that Paramount is making a list, but that they’re not sure who’s on it. But that they assume these people would be.

It’s all silly anyway. Even folks like Kevin Spacey eventually get back to working in Hollywood. Hollywood principles only go so far once the media attention dies down.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 day ago

*People critical of the attrocicities being committed by the genocidal Israeli government under netanyahu

I'm sure there's numerous Jewish actors on their list.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Actively rebranding Antisemitism to be the good thing?

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Netanyahu has already done that by so diluting the word "antisemitic" that it means "criticizing anything Israel does, including genocide." Being called antisemitic by his gang is a badge of honor. By ruining the word he has made it far harder for people to raise the alarm about actual antisemitism.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world 7 points 8 hours ago

I wonder what they think of all the UFC fighters about to be under their umbrella. Particularly guys like Bryce Mitchel, an ACTUAL antisemitic person.

[–] DamienGramatacus@lemmy.world 7 points 14 hours ago

Sounds like a good list to be on.

load more comments
view more: next ›