this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2025
499 points (99.2% liked)

politics

26256 readers
3961 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

President backs Cuomo in election eve Truth Social post as Mamdani hits back at Trump’s ‘threat – it is not the law’

On the eve of New York’s well-watched mayoral election, Donald Trump issued a threat to its voters: stop Zohran Mamdani or pay.

“If Communist Candidate Zohran Mamdani wins the Election for Mayor of New York City, it is highly unlikely that I will be contributing Federal Funds, other than the very minimum as required, to my beloved first home,” Trump said in a post on Truth Social. “I don’t want to send, as President, good money after bad.”

Trump’s comments echo those broadcast on Sunday during his appearance on CBS’s 60 minutes, in which he said: “It’s gonna be hard for me as the president to give a lot of money to New York, because if you have a communist running New York, all you’re doing is wasting the money you’re sending there.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 113 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'd love to see NYC set up a voluntary escrow account for federal taxes.

You don't have to pay shit till taxes are due, have NYC sit on their withholdings and trump won't be able to build any ballrooms.

[–] ElectricWaterfall@lemmy.zip 19 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The problem is employers take taxes directly out of paychecks and send directly to the federal government.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Pretty sure they don't have to, you can opt out and pay the full bill come tax day. That would certainly put sand in the gears.

[–] pineapple_pizza@lemmy.dexlit.xyz 8 points 1 day ago (4 children)

You have to pay quarterly if your withholding doesn't match you tax burdon. That's oversimplified but in general you cannot wait till tax day or else everyone would. You would just self withhold, leave the cash in a safe money market fund and make 4% on it till tax day.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Who cares? Do it anyway. The law doesn't fucking matter any more.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

It does for us plebs.

An in-group that the law protects but does not bind, and an out-group that the law binds but does not protect.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip 97 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Good thing it is legal for Trump and only Trump to meddle in elections. Yay.

[–] bear@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 1 day ago

This seems the require a better descriptor. Extorting an election.

[–] LanguageIsCool@lemmy.world 9 points 15 hours ago

This is what’s happening. We all get riled up saying NY contributes more to the federal government than it receives so Trump needs NY more than it needs Trump. Which may be true, but the reality is that Trump is trying to dissuade voters.

[–] santa@sh.itjust.works 93 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Other states should protest by withholding taxes, as well. United, yes?

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

That's not really how it works - there's no one big sack of cash that gets handed over by the state, individual businesses (and people) pay their taxes to the IRS directly, and then separately to the state tax agencies (obvs leaving out some of the draconian nuance here). States don't have a practical method of withholding taxes short of going to every business and demanding they stop paying the feds. While hypothetically possible at some point, it's not in the short term feasible.

[–] witten@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

There is a big sack of cash that gets handed over by the state: the federal payroll taxes for all the state government employees.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (8 children)

I disagree. I think having everyone send their federal taxes to a state entity for leverage purposes would be an interesting development. The individual is protected, and the state holds the bag.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] pineapple_pizza@lemmy.dexlit.xyz 12 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Tbh one of my main takeaways from this presidency is that states send too much money to the federal gov and have to ask for it back. It feels like having more local control of how these dollars are spent would maybe even be bi partisan.

[–] Barbarian@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago

It is not bipartisan. The countries that take more than they send (primarily Republican states, I'm led to believe) would absolutely refuse.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (2 children)

Aside from it not really working that way, that's what they want, they want states to start acting against the union. They are intentionally stressing the constitution and governmental system so they can then use that backlash as the justification to discard more of the constitution.

It's a bully teasing and poking and pulling your hair and being annoying until you finally swing at them, then they use that as the excuse to beat the shit out of you. It's aggression and hate and malice being implemented as political strategy.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Donjuanme@lemmy.world 58 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How the fuck...

When the ever loving fuck are people going to wake up and remember their government/civics lessons??

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Those teach how things are supposed to work, not what to do when things don't work as they should. I'm willing to wager no government willingly teaches people how to coerce it into working for them, but at least America definitely doesn't.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lilmookieesquire@lemmy.today 39 points 1 day ago

I really can’t think of higher praise.

[–] altkey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 36 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

I may be wrong, but isn't NYC more of a money generator than it's a receiver? If that's so, I don't see how NYC would suffer, but it would widen the divide between such areas and poor dotational ones, making their people possible maga recruits.

[–] balance8873@lemmy.myserv.one 16 points 17 hours ago (7 children)

Most blue areas produce money, most red areas (excluding Texas I think) are leeches.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 8 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

i think people are still expected to pay federal taxes. even if trump blocked funds.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 9 points 19 hours ago

Like King George did? How did that work out?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago

There is still a system in place where states contribute their federal taxes before that revenue is used for whatever we have budgeted. A state doesn't take "their share" first, and states depend on federal funding for a lot of projects and services.

That said, a state with large surpluses can probably write policies to use their state taxes to pay for federal programs that people want to keep, but that's a snarled-up and anti-american system, the taxes are supposed to be used for the people, not be used like a cudgel to enforce political partisanship. There would be a lot of courts who would challenge this, which still might go in Trump's favor because of his corruption of the judicial branch, but that's a LOT of work and expense for something that isn't going to actually get the administration anything but ire from the citizens of one of the ~~country's~~ world's largest, most prominent cities.

Largely, this is as usual, a massive pile of bullshit meant to fit into a right-wing news site's headline ticker, because people largely don't read stories, they just read headlines and don't question it. This kind of rhetoric has always been about making his most powerful asset, his ludicrously stupid and armed and fanatical base feel like he's still big strong daddy choking everyone.

[–] ABetterTomorrow@sh.itjust.works 34 points 21 hours ago

lol NY doesn’t need “his” funds. Trump needs NY funds though.

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 28 points 1 day ago (6 children)

At this point there's little reason for blue states to remain. The US federal government is too far gone to fix and the kinds of ass wipe Democrats who would get elected certainly are going to do anything like expanding the Supreme Court or her tailing the power of the president so we might as well start from scratch

[–] rockettaco37@feddit.nu 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

As somebody originally from New York State, I firmly believe that we could render the Federal government irrelevant simply through economic means alone

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 14 points 1 day ago

Actually, given how America works the only thing that would be necessary to completely destroy the federal government would be to have 40 senators, easily achievable, refuse to pass a budget. As we've seen without a budget everything grinds to a halt and eventually the federal workers are going to leave for other jobs. This might have already happened by sharing competence and the need to suppress the Epstein files but you could do it intentionally if you so desired

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If Biden had an ounce of guts he would have started a shadow court with ethics rules and ignored the subprime court when it was clear they were off the rails.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 23 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

The billionaires don’t want you to know this but you pay taxes to the states your business is located in. You don’t just “leave” because taxes. The businesses these billionaires own in New York are still subject to taxes.

What’s crazy is the right has “donated” more money to supporting cuomo than Mamdani would have even taxed them.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 19 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (4 children)

Idk man, I see a lot of red caps at a certain party's rallies

red = obvious communist symbolism

I think those caps even say "make america great again" which obviously sounds like a communist slogan

I'd say we arrest these filthy communists 😏

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 18 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

Trump has a lot of property in New York.

Sure would be a shame if he finally saw some consequences and lost a few dozen of them.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 18 points 16 hours ago

So that would mean that New York could stop paying federal taxes, no? I'm sure it contributes more than it receives

I always find it hilarious how red states and their leaders are all about cutting off funds to the blue states that fund their miserable existence. "We will secede from the US!" Ok Boomer, good luck with funding yourself as all of you are so mismanaged that you would fail to feed your own population within the year.

[–] DeICEAmerica@lemmy.world 16 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

Whenever these fucks try and paint Americans as terrorists and threaten to cut off anything they create monsters they can't control. Anyone he attacks becomes wildly popular and almost assures them victory. Especially if he has his thugs come rough them up.

Fuck you cancer. You take far too many good people while skipping this piece of shit.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

You have nothing to lose but your chains.

[–] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world 13 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Hilarious watching these idiots call literally everything they don't like "communism".

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 13 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (3 children)

djt wouldn't be able to name the communist countries in the world to save his life. It is a very anti-American behavior to label half of Americans as enemies. The US totally includes an opposition party. Idiot still doesn't understand what a democracy is and how to stay in his lane.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] frankiehollywood@lemmy.zip 10 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Quexotic@infosec.pub 8 points 2 hours ago

Go ahead TACO.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 7 points 4 hours ago

Your move, orange boy.

[–] Wilco@lemmy.zip 7 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

This is impeachable ... par fot the course with Trump and MAGA. So sick of injustice.

load more comments (1 replies)

The time to speak up is now. The place to do it is everywhere.

load more comments
view more: next ›