this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2025
444 points (100.0% liked)

politics

26256 readers
3080 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Schmoozing the super-rich to fund a $300m ballroom while cutting food aid for those on low incomes threw the president’s architectural folly into sharp relief

It was a feast fit for a king – and any billionaire willing to be his subject. From gold-rimmed plates on gold-patterned tablecloths decorated with gold candlestick holders, they gorged on heirloom tomato panzanella salad, beef wellington and a dessert of roasted Anjou pears, cinnamon crumble and butterscotch ice-cream.

On 15 October, Donald Trump welcomed nearly 130 deep-pocketed donors, allies and representatives of major companies for a dinner at the White House to reward them for their pledged contributions to a vast new ballroom now expected to cost $300m. That the federal government had shut down two weeks earlier scarcely seemed to matter.

But two weeks later, the shutdown is starting to bite – and throw Trump’s architectural folly into sharp relief. On Saturday, with Congress still locked in a legislative stalemate, a potential benefit freeze could leave tens of millions of low-income Americans without food aid. Democrats accuse Trump’s Republican party of “weaponising hunger” to pursue an extreme rightwing agenda.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheJesusaurus@piefed.ca 39 points 2 days ago (11 children)

The American people are allowing themselves to be embarrassed daily by this man. This can all end as soon as the American people decide to end it.

[–] akilou@sh.itjust.works 49 points 2 days ago (19 children)

Hi, American here. I decided to end it. It doesn't seem to be ending. Now what?

Please enlighten me to this silver bullet action item that I can take to end this. I'm showing up to protests, I'm calling my representatives. It's not working.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 9 points 1 day ago

The bullets don't have to be silver. The GOP aren't werewolves.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You are a single person within the US. They are saying “the American people” which is to say that the collection of people made up of the general population of the US must decide to stop this nonsense.

That means that all of you need to finally stop chasing centrists, stop voting for fascists, etc. We aren’t stupid, we know that there are people trying, but “the American people” is a group still that includes tens of millions of nazis and tens of millions of people who don’t even vote because they’re ignorant of what’s going on.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

That means that all of you need to finally stop chasing centrists, stop voting for fascists, etc.

And start working cooperatively together towards that common goal, rather than stubbornly insisting on being a bunch of "rugged individuals".

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 2 days ago (4 children)

ThEy JuSt LeT hIm GeT aWaY wItH iT.

I'm so tired of this short-sighted take.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Meaning, what? The GOP controls Congress, the courts and the WH.

[–] nymnympseudonym@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Au contraire

It doesn't take "people"

Just one person who loves beautiful WWII Italian music

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 days ago

Bella ciao, baby.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] MourningDove@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It’s his boyhood fantasy to pretend to be a king. It’s too bad no one told him that coward kings like him never ended well.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

His sons absolutely seem the type to hire assassins on each other over succession. Fortunately he doesn't seem to care that much about any of them

[–] switcheroo@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I hope that garbage PoS is still alive to see all of it torn down. Preferably from a view behind bars with the rest of the Nazi Party, I mean, the GOP.

[–] match@pawb.social 4 points 1 day ago (3 children)

he's going to pay a lot of money to be one of the first digital-immortal AIs and there will be debates about the ethics of torturing his AI model

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

What a way to make money! "Download a copy of Trump's consciousness today and do whatever you want with it!"

[–] match@pawb.social 2 points 1 day ago

(I will be opposed but it'll be a hard sell)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] smeg@infosec.pub 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Maybe he should say, "let them eat cake"

[–] grte@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 days ago

Let them eat big macs.

[–] wowwoweowza@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Does anyone have a link to the complete guest list of this recent schmooze a palooza?

[–] drhodl@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Someone should forward a copy of that list to Luigi.....

[–] wowwoweowza@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago

Well… he’s a little imprisoned right now… but there are other people who may like to communicate that it’s in bad taste to celebrate decadence while almost have of our country lives in uncertainty.

[–] lauha@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I hope Trump's "Let them eat bread" moment comes soon

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Just out of curiosity, in this fantasy scenario does the military:

a) unanimously decides to join the "anty-Trump" movement and overseas peaceful transition of power

b) watches idly while ICE and secret service massacres protesters

c) splits into pro and anti Trump factions and starts civil war

?

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I know a lot of people in the military. If you were on the inside, you'd see a lot of sudden, mostly innocuous incompetence, because the last thing most people in the military want to hear is someone telling them how to do their job. Couple that with most people in the military being relatively sane, and I'd bet you'll start to see operations get canceled or failed or reschedule due to all sorts of "oopsies".

The modern military has never had to deal with an insurrectionist in the oval office though, so who knows, but I don't think you'd see open rebellion from the armed forces, just epic sandbagging.

Caveat: This doesn't count any private armies the assholes in charge raise up, like how they're trying to turn ICE into their own Einsatzgruppen. those won't be staffed with military or ex military, they'll primarily be disaffected, uneducated young men they can control almost exclusively via propaganda.

If ICE ever started a shooting skirmish with a deployment of the National Guard, they'd have difficulty identifying the ICE member's bodies afterwards. Military units have discipline, but if they get fired on, all bets are off.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 2 points 2 days ago (4 children)

That's an interesting idea. 54-58% of military voted for Trump. So you think that half of the army would just sit there while the other half blocked their deployment or do you think that by the time people rise against Trump most of the military will stop supporting him?

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm sure if you break that down by branch you'll see it line up mostly by education. The Air Force has a lot less maga in it than the Marines, for example.

Same goes for the Officers vs Enlisted in every branch

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 days ago

NORMALLY this would get me to Maybe Note Possibly vote Republican NEXT election BUT he's ALSO Kidnapping Children AND defending Child Sex Traffickers so REPUBLICAN TIL I DIE! Which might be Soon because I have no SNAP and no Healthcare anymore!

[–] aarRJaay@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I'm still convinced that "The Ball Room" is actually the name of the strip club he's buidling there in the East Wing rather than anything else.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 days ago

It clearly satisfies his gold toilet fetish

[–] pleaseletmein@lemmy.zip 1 points 23 hours ago

Kids under thirteen get in free!

[–] Puddinghelmet@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

organize mass strikes and strike funds for those in need, connect with your neighbors, stop this gestapo poop

[–] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 1 points 1 hour ago

Hey, I've seen this one before!

load more comments
view more: next ›