this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2025
532 points (98.5% liked)

World News

50629 readers
3022 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rozodru@pie.andmc.ca 67 points 4 days ago (1 children)

ok so....do something about it. oh wait...you can't.

just another dog and pony show.

[–] tornavish@lemmy.cafe 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Now I want to go to a dog show.

[–] klemptor@startrek.website 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

What about the ponies? Are you a ponyphobe or something?

[–] zebidiah@lemmy.ca 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The sad thing is most ponyphobes actually turn out to be ponies themselves

[–] HowAbt2day@futurology.today 3 points 3 days ago

Self loathing ponies?

[–] deranger@sh.itjust.works 62 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Which global government enforces international law? Ah that’s right, there is none. Might as well say it violates galactic or universal law.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 45 points 4 days ago (1 children)

People follow it by agreement and the idea is they face sanctions if they don't. It's unlikely America will face direct sanctions. However they are unlikely to find many friendly partners moving forward. The more heinous acts, the less other countries can overlook it.

It's not just USA. The more countries that skirt international law, the more others also do the same and the less others listen to America. Putin doesn't care about international law when invading Ukraine. Then china stops caring about consequences for invading Taiwan etc.

It's stuff like this that makes the international community more afraid of Trump. The grifting and grafting is an internal problem. The fascism is a humanity problem. The breakdown in rule of law is a global problem.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Not to mention that israel been breaching all international laws since it's creation in 48

[–] nwtreeoctopus@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

And how much of that has been enabled by US backing?

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

Before the USA, it was enabled by the British. Also all those western countries quickly recognized israel after terrorists attacks by zionists like King David hotel bombing and the nekba ethenic cleansing while today they have ton of conditions to effectively on the ground to back up a two state solution without even palestinians right to an army

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 20 points 4 days ago (2 children)
[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

This timeline they've already been through the system and saw our broadcasts. Guess who is on the "Do Not Contact" list for the warp capable group?

[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 days ago

That's exactly how it plays out. No first contact until 2063. Except there's been a really ugly nuclear war already by that time.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

We have to go through the Bell Riots, the Eugenics Wars, and WWIII, before the Vulcans will show their pointy little ears.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 days ago

Well we're on track for sanctuary districts

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Maybe if someone lets Miss Universe know she can send the message on.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 30 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Should have him arrested next time he steps outside the Untied States

[–] pinheadednightmare@lemmy.world 17 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I would pay good money for this

[–] FreddiesLantern@leminal.space 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Think of the ratings this would get, uyge, tremendous ratings like you’ve never seen before.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 23 points 3 days ago (4 children)

So declare him a war criminal, and arrest him anytime he leaves America.

That's why George W Bush can't leave the country. He's wanted everywhere in the world as a war criminal.

[–] ToastedRavioli@midwest.social 10 points 3 days ago

I say go tit for tat and just put a bounty on his head, since hes so comfortable doing that to other heads of state

[–] Tja@programming.dev 6 points 3 days ago
[–] MourningDove@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 days ago
[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago

Feel free to arrest and indict the fucking orange bastard

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Of course and the International Criminal Court start a case.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 days ago (2 children)

ICC doesn’t have authority over the US because they don’t recognize it.

[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Doesn't it? I am pretty sure they have authority over everyone. US and other non signatories just do not have to hand them over. But if they ever visit a signatory state, they should be arrested.

[–] T156@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

In theory, they do, but the US not only doesn't recognise the authority of the ICC, they have provisions for a military invasion of the Hague/Netherlands if a member of the US armed forces is tried in the ICC.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

The sane 1st World countries recognize it and he can still be prosecuted.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago (3 children)

All those western countries who was saying israel has to defend itself. Why are you not saying Venezuela has the right to defend itself?

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Venezuela can't defend itself against the US. The US has been very good at keeping South America in check. They are basically all vassals to the US. The moment someone gets out of line the CIA shows up for regime change.

The white elephant in the room is the US military holding the entire world hostage.

[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 13 points 3 days ago

The US is the premier terrorist state in the world.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

I don't think venezuela has a choice. The usa is already trying to do the coup

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

Doesn’t apply to countries that won’t allow American corporations to exploit their people and natural resources

[–] GaryGhost@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

What is the UN going to do about it? Israel can wipe out an entire population, murder is lagalized

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 0 points 3 days ago

Aipac/russia has control over the US , uk and some of the EU govt.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Issue an international arrest warrant for the entire administration please. They are literally manufacturing another Native American genocide and we need the world to help us stop this madness.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The UN needs an army or at least a sanctioning body that can do real things.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 days ago

The army would just be an arm of its strongest members to ensure they stay the strongest.

[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Can the UN even do anything to the United States if they have a unilateral security council veto? I would think that the USA would successfully find a way to argue that sanctioning them for crimes against humanity is not considered a "procedural" decision.

Can the UN even do anything

no

to the United States

gods no

if they have a unilateral security council veto?

the "don't do that" button does, quite effectively, prevent the UN from doing anything, and for some godforsaken reason 5 countries all have one

successfully find a way to argue

they don't need to do that, that's what the "don't do that" button is for

[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago

Someone stop this Shittler

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 3 days ago

its like calling the israeli expansion into gaza unacceptable, but nothing is being done.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 1 points 3 days ago

countries need to start making treaties about military spending and isolate ones that spend over an agreed upon maximum plus have checks for hidden spending.