this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2025
438 points (97.8% liked)

Progressive Politics

3434 readers
649 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 84 points 1 day ago

That's an interesting historical fact of increasing relevance. Here's a topical quote that pares nicely with it:

Ask for work. If they don't give you work, ask for bread. If they do not give you work or bread, then take bread. ― Emma Goldman, Anarchism and Other Essays

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 50 points 1 day ago

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Years_of_Lead_(Italy)

Italy had a strong leftist movement. But it also had some other shit.

[–] tornavish@lemmy.cafe 35 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If that happened anywhere in the United States, 1000 police officers were surrounded the place and just opened fire

[–] Soulg@ani.social 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Almost as if that's why it's so much harder to see actions like this that everyone is constantly bitching about not seeing

[–] tornavish@lemmy.cafe 4 points 1 day ago

I don’t know… I think the bigger problem is considering it bitching

[–] OldChicoAle@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If this happened in America, cops would be called and they would walk in and shoot everyone

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

and then the grocery store closes and everyone loses their jobs and the neighborhood doesn't have a grocery store to go to anymore.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

*cries in San Francisco*

[–] Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If you care more seriously, you'd take over the farms and distribute it. Taking over grocery stores without the greater infrastructure is just causing food shortages when the distribution points can't function, and the producers don't have funding

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh yeah, they tried this in China in the 50s. It went great.

[–] somethingsnappy@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It would be stupid and terrible either way, but that was a government takeover.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub -3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

but that was a government takeover.

How else do you imagine a large-scale infrastructure takeover would happen? an angry mob?

[–] somethingsnappy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago

It was something they could do a few times. It makes a nice story, but doesn't mean there was any significant change.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 1 points 1 day ago

The post is not a description of large-scale infrastructure takeover. That was literally the point of this comment thread.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I get what you’re saying but tactically this makes no sense. A farm is only useful over the long term, which would require you to defend it from police and potentially military forces. Groceries can be distributed from stores fairly quickly, so you could give them away quickly if the state forces are slow.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Groceries can be distributed from stores fairly quickly

Once. Then the store shuts down and nobody can get groceries.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Seriously asking, did that actually happen in Milan?

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 2 points 1 day ago

Not sure. I know I read about a lot of the places that were subject to looting during the BLM protests closed down. I don't have good info as to what happened with them long term though.

If your goal is exclusively to lootz grocery stores are easier and a better target

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not a great long term strategy though if you want grocery stores to stay in business.

[–] MummysLittleBloodSlut@lemmy.blahaj.zone 37 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't want grocery chains to stay in business. I want them to go bankrupt and make way for locally owned grocers.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 9 points 1 day ago (3 children)

How do you know that the "supermarkets" referenced in OP were not locally owned? This is 1973 in Italy, we're not talking about Wal-Mart.

What exactly would prevent these nutjobs from doing the same thing to locally owned stores? Do you think they were being particularly selective in their grandstanding tactics?

[–] xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 24 points 1 day ago

That's the thing. Right now, I believe we are talking about Walmart.

[–] thespcicifcocean@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

It was in milan though, so it definitely could have been large chains

[–] Zombie@feddit.uk 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

That's an awful lot of assumptions from someone who clearly hasn't read anything about the events...

Edit: and because I got curious, here's some reading on the topic. I've not found much on the internet about it, but I found this: https://libcom.org/article/take-over-city-community-struggle-italy-lotta-continua

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub -3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You're right, the person I responded to did make a lot of assumptions.

[–] edible_funk@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

You think you're cute or clever, rest assured you're the only one that does.

[–] MummysLittleBloodSlut@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't think the point of this comic is to judge the past. I think it's to plan for the future. I want to go proletariat shopping at Walmart.

I would grab so many PS5's with which to feed my hungry children

[–] king_comrade@lemmy.world 9 points 23 hours ago

Peter Kropotkin comes to mind, my favourite quote of his (from the Conquest of Bread) is: "the available food ought to be shared by all without exception... ‘But provisions will run short in a month!’ our critics at once exclaim. ‘So much the better,’ say we. It will prove that for the first time on record the people have had enough to eat."

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago

It's too early in the morning for this "no apostrophe" shit....

Took me far too long wondering who the hell thought supermarkets existed in 73 AD.

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Anybody have a source for this? I don't doubt it happened, but I'm struggling to find more information.

[–] lavander@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

Yeah, used to be a thing. Source: I am Italian and everyone knows 🙂

Edit: ok here a source but in Italian (Wikipedia)

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net 1 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Nice. Should continue to be a thing.