this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2025
1369 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

75756 readers
7254 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

National Science Foundation (NSF) had offered $1.5 million to address structural vulnerabilities in Python and the Python Package Index (PyPI), but the Foundation quickly became dispirited with the terms of the grant it would have to follow.

"These terms included affirming the statement that we 'do not, and will not during the term of this financial assistance award, operate any programs that advance or promote DEI [diversity, equity, and inclusion], or discriminatory equity ideology in violation of Federal anti-discrimination laws,'" Crary noted. "This restriction would apply not only to the security work directly funded by the grant, but to any and all activity of the PSF as a whole."

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (13 children)

Who is the person downvoting the two comments in here???

load more comments (13 replies)

Political commissars will be present at all meetings.

[–] bluesocks@lemmings.world 0 points 1 day ago

Good.

I'm glad that the people offering this money did not compromise on their ideals.

[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works -5 points 3 days ago (5 children)

The PSF is (presumably) already required to comply with Federal anti-discrimination laws. Am I misreading the text or does it not actually create any new obligations for the PSF if they were to accept the grant?

[–] deathbird@mander.xyz 2 points 1 day ago

If the article is to be believed there's also a provision there saying that they cannot engage in any programs that advance or promote DEI (diversity, equity, and inclusion). That part's new, and it's honestly not well defined. What is DEI? Racial quotas and discrimination? Cultural acknowledgements? Anti-discrimination? All these things have been called DEI. Some of these things have been called the other. Without clarity, the likeliest definition is "whatever annoys the administration".

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›