this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2025
876 points (94.0% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

35365 readers
4616 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ordnance_qf_17_pounder@reddthat.com 219 points 4 days ago (10 children)

Holy fuck even "nudes" is getting censored now

[–] KraeuterRoy@feddit.org 112 points 4 days ago (6 children)

Just wait awhile and it'll be be called una-dressed or something even more stupid.

[–] SoloCritical@lemmy.world 126 points 4 days ago (4 children)
[–] TheJesusaurus@piefed.ca 26 points 3 days ago

Ok but that's actually funny

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] arox@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 18 points 4 days ago

Unalive a dress

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 12 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

B*rthday su*t

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Starski@lemmy.zip 21 points 4 days ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Credibly_Human@lemmy.world 199 points 4 days ago (26 children)

You fucking wish.

In reality nudes from women look shit too.

People just generally give women a pass/see women as more attractive for the same equivalent level of attractiveness or effort for the photo. They also feel much more pressured by society to be all "WOW! I've never seen tits in my life!!! Magnifico! βœ¨βœ¨πŸ†*

Nudes suck.

Thats my hot take.

The fucking suck, the person sending them expects you to receive them like they're gods gift to green earth and they're (the photos, not the person) just mid, so you have to act like you're a pavloved chimpanzee in full caveman mode so excited by this barely lit could be big foot sighting.

At best nudes are an indication the person sending you them wants to fuck.

They're not jerk off material. They're barely semi chub material.

They're just.... mid.

Could be the hottest person imaginable and they'd still be mid.

Its ultimately just a poorly taken picture with poor lighting, with someone who (reasonably) won't be bending over backwards to send you page 34 of the Kama Sutra.

It would be so fucking nice if it was deemed socially appropriate to say "Look lady, I don't need to see a 15th picture of your gooch from the same fucking angle" (but you know, with tact), but instead if you ever were to do that, they'd misinterpret your message as "I'm not all that sexually interested in you" rather than "I'm not all that sexually interested in every piece of evidence there is for extraterrestrial UFOs existing, but in a vaguely human shape".

Just a bit of a rant I hope was humorous but like seriously, I thought a few years back... probably like 15-20 years back, we all kinda agreed that nudes were stupid for security and revenge porn reasons, but now it seems the world is back at it again, for seemingly no reason, because next to no one is actually masturbating to these, and its like, just some fun chatting would get across the same effect or more, because it could display more personal knowledge of the other persons preferences and your desire for them.

Bah.

[–] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 158 points 4 days ago

That's a spicy hot take. Upvoted for passion and expressiveness, but hard disagree.

[–] Colors@lemmy.world 81 points 4 days ago

Upvoted for bravery, but I have never disagreed so wholly with someone on any topic more than this.

[–] Droggelbecher@lemmy.world 70 points 4 days ago

Thanks for this reminder that I can ardently disagree with someone's opinion and still think absolutely nothing less of them.

[–] RaoulDuke85@fedia.io 53 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Nudes suck! Please women don’t send me any to change my mind!

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 54 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 31 points 3 days ago

Task succeeded failury

[–] Noodle07@lemmy.world 37 points 3 days ago

This guy is receiving way too many nudes

[–] SillyDude@lemmy.zip 35 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I'll be using this as copy pasta with nudes substituted for various topics

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 24 points 4 days ago (9 children)

I think a lot of men genuinely pick bad ways to take nudes. There's "mid pic", then there's "pic from a really bad angle with bad lighting", and especially dick pics tend to be the latter.

[–] Credibly_Human@lemmy.world 16 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Honestly, no doubt there's truth there, as I think a lot of guys focus on making their dicks look big because from a typical straight(... actually gay too) guys perspective on sex, like thinking about sex from a mans perspective as if you were a woman, its like, you gotta make the lightning rod spark. Like the weight of the dick is elevated much more than the types of shit women want to see more of, like a lot of veiny-ness (which I think I can speak for the average man in saying, we generally don't like on women (I think gay men differ from men here)), that brooding batman style of posing, the arms, forearms, and some chest hair, a confident and slightly domineering position, etc. Heck, I'm probably even somewhat wrong there.

I do think women tend to do this quite a bit as well, with all that weird duck lip, hand under chin, Victorian era poses, theatre kid coy, kinda "Sappho and her friend" leaning photos where to a lot of guys its like, Eyyy, show off all of that thing (where that thing is honestly a lot of things), or give me some "Ill be like this for you [sir/daddy/baby/pet/insert favourite pet name]".

I dunno. It just all feels like I think people find it hard to conceptualize what the other person is truly looking for out of a photo because despite being into each other, people don't really share their photo preferences in particular, and you can't even necessarily transfer what you know about the other person in bed to what they'll think looks good in a photo because the scenario is so different.

That being said, I really do think most pictures from both, dare I say all (to be more inclusive), tend to still ultimately, on average, be just mid.

Like no one is opening up their curtains, buying diffuse lighting, taking a hundred different shots, story boarding their angles, making sure all the money showpieces are hairless, or appropriately and perfectly haired or whatever it is for whoever it's intended for, dehydrating to lean up, etc.

Like, to get nice photos, you basically have to become a NSFW content creator without the monetary incentive, and that's a lot of work when the other person probably appreciate that time a lot more in person.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 20 points 4 days ago

As someone who both loves to see nude dudes, and who gets... not 'pestered' for them, but 'requested, often' for them, either you are getting sent shit-tier pics or you think the mona lisa of tits is a boner-killer.

All I need is a guy, visually or audibly (woof~) enjoying themselves. That's it, that's the core request. I prefer that the camera is focused, that I can see that cock in full-frame for the entire duration, that he's washed his hands and doesn't have crumbs under his fingernails, stuff like that. But if it's hot, at the end of the day I don't give a fuck. And if I can sense that it's got real passion - maybe there's a ton of pictures and I can follow the story, it's building narrative (and need, and leaking precum), the agonizing peak, and the messy finish, fuck yeah. If it has needy, desperate moans, gasps, begging... I might finish before they do.

My own stuff is awful, I know it's awful, I warn others that it is awful. I get told that it's not. I warn people that I'm not attractive, that I'm awkward (I'm chubby and disabled). Again, I get told that it's hot, and am encouraged to keep making new stuff. And the people that I follow, I try to encourage too. Putting yourself out there, in any capacity, is a huge leap of trust. People are awful, and for many exposing themselves like this is scary. I follow people who, like myself, post to the internet where if anyone knows the service you're posting on, or find the link, they can view it. And I also get sent stuff just for me directly, and those I view as even more special. I could be a huge piece of shit and share them with others, but I'm both not a huge piece of shit, and the understanding that someone made content for me because I want them, I crave them, I want to ravage their body until they faint and then keep going (consentually), for example, and they understand and are signaling they want that, too - huff!

You need better stuff to look at, and/or a personal connection to someone who wants to [TV bleep] you until your [bleep] is so exhausted and ruined that that then they are going to [bleep] you until you scream and beg, then get harder and harder until you [bleep] over and over until you are totally dry, and they they are going to focus the attention on themselves for part 2. And they want to document these plans in photographic form, maybe with a captivating video ending. Those are the people you want to find.

Someone's never received good nudes

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 66 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Nodes? Nades? I don't get it.

[–] bampop@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago

Here's me getting all excited thinking a new Blender tutorial just dropped

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago

'Nades. This is the pose each gender makes after lobbing a grenade into an opposing military position.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] yumyumsmuncher@feddit.uk 36 points 3 days ago

Guys please don't omit balls

[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 35 points 3 days ago (4 children)

I’ve been told my nudes are very tasteful. They want a sexy picture of you with your junk showing, (preferably full nudes, or pants fully down, nobody looks appealing with a frank and beans spilling out of their zipper) and not just a picture of your schlong.

[–] HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world 34 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I just put a little top hat on my dick and call it good

C'mon, at least draw on a smile, stick on some googly eyes, trim off a bit of your pubes and paste them on styled as muttonchops…

[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Can you show us an example for reference?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] HerrNetzwwerk@feddit.org 34 points 4 days ago (14 children)

Real question how du I make it classy

[–] tanisnikana@lemmy.world 25 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Put effort in. Poses, lighting, some measure of a narrative. Use a decent camera instead of your phone’s front-facing camera with the flash on.

[–] pmk@lemmy.sdf.org 42 points 4 days ago (3 children)

A narrative? Like, "Not only am I naked, I'm on my way to... water the plants. They are thirsty, and so am I... In the background, dimly lit, you can see an ESP32 microcontroller... yup, that's the kind of guy I am... oh my, I can do pulse width modulation with my bare hands..."

[–] Credibly_Human@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago (1 children)

This probably bangs with autistic chicks

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago (12 children)

Hi I am an autistic chick and yes, please, this would without a word of a lie 100% absolutely work on me.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] yakko@feddit.uk 19 points 4 days ago

You'll just have to look at sexy dudes to copy

[–] Tracaine@lemmy.world 16 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Step 1: Be attractive. Step 2: Don't be unattractive Step 3: Return to step 1

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DScratch@sh.itjust.works 14 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Sprinkle some flower petals around your zipper

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] miraclerandy@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Get a fancy defused light, pose like the woman on the left, and get a tiara or some shit

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] solomonschuler@lemmy.zip 29 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Why did I read this as nodes. Am I seriously that married to CS that I read Nudes as nodes (as in nodes from linked lists).

I guess it doesn't help that the they've used the character 'β€’' in place of the 'u' to solicite the word "Nudes."

[–] python@lemmy.world 23 points 3 days ago

Tfw you ask her for nudes but she sends her node_modules folder

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] percent@infosec.pub 24 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Thanks for censoring the word "nβ€’des" so it's family friendly

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 21 points 3 days ago

It's still hot when women do it, for some reason.

[–] markovs_gun@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I love that I can literally see the lady on the left's nipples through her shirt but God forbid I see the word "Nudes"

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)

Send nudes*

*nudibranches

collapsed inline media

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Why in fuck's name would the algo care about "nudes"? Clout-chasing morons…

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Send me nudes of your souls, not your bodies!

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Send unsolicited cat pictures. Trust me, works way better.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next β€Ί