this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2025
532 points (97.2% liked)

Technology

75756 readers
1975 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I just don’t feel comfortable building a robot army here, and then being ousted because of some asinine recommendations from ISS and Glass Lewis, who have no f**king clue. I mean those guys are corporate terrorists. Lemme explain the core problem here, so many of the passive funds vote along the lines of what ISS and Glass Lewis recommend. Now, they have made many terrible recommendations in the past that if those recommendations had been followed would have been extremely destructive to the future of the company. Now, If you’ve got passive funds that essentially defer responsibility for the vote to Glass Lewis and ISS, then you can have extremely disastrous consequences for a publicly traded company if too much of the publicly traded company is controlled by index funds. It’s de facto controlled by Glass Lewis and ISS. This is a fundamental problem for corporate governance, because they’re not voting along the lines that are actually good for shareholders. That’s the big issue, I mean, that’s what it comes down to. ISS Glass Lewis corporate terrorism. -Elon Musk, Tesla Q3 shareholder conference call, October 22, 2025

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Fucking egomaniac.

[–] SugarCatDestroyer@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

collapsed inline media

This picture describes it pretty well.

Or these fascists are distracting people from something important with these performances...

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

but this person with a net worth of $479,200,000,000 (according to Forbes as of today) is crying for $1,000,000,000,000 more for a large group of toy robots.

Because without that contract, TSLA is worthless.

"WHAT YOU'RE LOOKING AT HERE IS ADVANCED WARFARE"

[–] Teal@piefed.zip 7 points 1 week ago

Take a lot more drugs Elon. Be sure it's enough to permenently quiet that scrambled brain of yours.

In a time when the entire world seems to be suffering from unstable leadership, rising costs of everything because of the decisions of people like him, oppressive and invasive actions directed at some of the most vulnerable people.

All that and much more, but this person with a net worth of $479,200,000,000 (according to Forbes as of today) is crying for $1,000,000,000,000 more for a large group of toy robots.

Some people have nothing and go on to accomplish great things. He has everything and needs more handouts to do anything.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 5 points 1 week ago

He really needs $1 million, but he'll take the rest, just in case.

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 4 points 1 week ago

I'll do it for half of your offer. $250 Billion is plenty for me to pull off a robot army.

[–] utopiah@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Brooks (Roomba, Baxter, MIT, etc) says it's sill not enough https://rodneybrooks.com/why-todays-humanoids-wont-learn-dexterity/

If you skim through his piece, at least watch the 2x 30s videos, really drive the point IMHO.

[–] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 week ago

Is he revering to the self driving Teslas when he says 'robot army'?

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Another chuck e cheese token recipient in the making

[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

they look like shit kinda. do they do anything useful?

[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

They kill citizens who defy their fascist corporate overlords. So nothing to worry about.

[–] sirico@feddit.uk 1 points 1 week ago

Just one more leverage bro

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Well Musk’s quote there isn’t wrong.

Musk isn’t an engineer, but neither are those consultants. They should all be deferring to deeper within the company for technical decisions instead of conflating some sci fi literacy with practical decision making, and leave musk to making much coarser ones at most.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 6 days ago

So, is this a request for help, a threat, or just a grift?

Perhaps he really is concerned about rogue AI Slaughterbots, and wants to avoid that horrible Terminator-style future? Nah.

Perhaps it's a veiled threat - "I got these rogue Slaughterbots who are straining to get out there and fuck up the world, unless you give me a trillion bucks."

Or maybe, there are no robots, or even viable plans to build them, and he just wants a trillion bucks.

It's probably #3, and he'll use the money to build the Slaughterbots, and then do #2.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›