Here's a better article, from the same source, with actual details. I'm not sure why they bothered posting this other version that doesn't say what sort of threats or actions the man allegedly did, when they already posted a version of the story yesterday with those details.
this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2025
1 points (66.7% liked)
News
32964 readers
6520 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I guess my article was to show how cops sprung into action and stopped him. Like normal though, it is usually family members or friends that stop it.
Clap clap, now do schools
Catching the person before the act is hard.
Bullshit. Most of these shooters cried for attention and everyone was like, “yeah I could see that coming”
You are absolutely right. The family or friends just don't act. The signs are there but the disconnect allows it to happen, that's why it is hard to stop.
A tricky point . You have the right to bear arms except when and where the authorities don’t want you to.
...you must have missed the part where he is a felon, which isn't allowed to carry after their conviction, and the part where the family knew of his plans to attack others.
I’ve heard felons aren’t allowed arms and have wondered why the constitution explicitly denies them the right. Surely there aren’t laws to prohibit them.
I mean, you don’t have a right to shoot up an airport though.
That’s kind of the important detail here.
People are so passionate about the right to bear arms as protected by the constitution but seem just as happy stop others using laws that appear to conflict with that right.