this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2025
256 points (96.7% liked)

memes

17872 readers
5172 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Bennyboybumberchums@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago

Rich cunts then:

collapsed inline media

Rich cunts now:

collapsed inline media

Poor cunts then:

collapsed inline media

Poor cunts now:

collapsed inline media

Or to put it another way, nothing has changed. The upper classes still dress like wankers who sniff their own farts, and the lower classes still dress with whatever they can afford that works for them.

[–] blimthepixie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 1 week ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] MyDarkestTimeline01@ani.social 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Pretty sure only aristocrats dressed like that.

[–] fartsparkles@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (3 children)

And wasn’t the makeup to hide chlamydia / syphilis etc?

[–] yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think it's also for the opposite? I mean, the white face, rosy cheeks and red lips were popularized due to the romantization of tuberculosis. The guy on the left could literally have tuberculosis looking at his face.

One of the many sources: https://historycollection.com/tuberculosis-became-the-victorian-standard-of-beauty/

[–] heyWhatsay@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 week ago

Thanks for the lovely rabbit hole to fall into

[–] hanrahan@piefed.social 6 points 1 week ago

Sure and perume was becase you didn't bathe ... And yet we still use both

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (9 children)
[–] yakko@feddit.uk 7 points 6 days ago

Ladies, What's stopping you from dressing like this

collapsed inline media

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

I'm more of a summer/spring in my color scheme

[–] Donaldist@feddit.org 4 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I am an 1,87m tall, somewhat broad shouldered dude over 40 with a bit of a beer belly and a beard (imagine a stereotypical lumberjack but working in IT)... what is stopping me dressing like that? Well... i don't want to see people around me clawing out their eyes.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago (5 children)

My penis would dangle out the bottom of the skirt.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] madjo@feddit.nl 3 points 6 days ago

I don’t have breasts like that

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I'm a bear built, and even though I just bought a skirt. I'll never look cute like that,

[–] alternategait@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Don't under estimate the power of the combo of tiny skirt thicc thighs.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And you know what!

I'm a cis male, and I'm not even thinking this is any form of gender bending. I'm wearing them because when I wear them, they are manly.

I'm not against blurring gender lines, it just not my style. I just hate that make fashion is basically funeralwear.

When I die I want everyone to attend in the most colorful and creative outfits, need to make a will to ask people wearing a traditional suit to fuck off.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] HailSeitan@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (4 children)
[–] MangioneDontMiss@feddit.nl 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Fashion??? In this economy?!

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 week ago (3 children)

wasn't the make up meant to hide the lesions and wigs to hide the peeling scalp and hair loss?

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

hair loss

... maybe we should bring back pompous wigs.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago

Those lesions and hair loss were usually caused by syphilis which was considered wildly scandalous at the time.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dumbass@aussie.zone 11 points 1 week ago (4 children)

There is absofukinglutely nothing stopping you from dressing like that, only yourself.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Who's got boring socks? Not me, sir. 😤

collapsed inline media

Socks with sandals

Oh no

[–] BC_viper@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Don't you ever insinuate i have boring socks ever again.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Spaniard@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Noble vs peasant.

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Mark Zuckerberg, who dresses pretty much like the guy on the right, then adds a watch worth $100k to indicate his status.

[–] axexrx@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The pants shirts an hoodies the ultra wealthy wear are also often obscenely overpriced versions of the normal clothes. Like Luis Vuitton's plain tshirt, with a same color embossed logo on the front, for 700$. Or this one by Prada for 2500$ (its casmere)

[–] dingus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I legitimately do not understand

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Rich guys wearing really dour clothes is actually a relatively recent phenomenon in history. Up to the French Revolution the aristocrats were peacocked up to the max; maybe it was fear of the guillotine that saw their successors going around in North Face jackets.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Maybe we have grown out as a society of that childish one-upping each other with made up rules?

[–] Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Have you met society? Society is a petty bitch!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Bluewing@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think they dropped a word there. I think "rich" was the word they dropped......

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

that's a part of it, however during the Victorian time. it became fashionable for men to be stoic and boring. that's why a guy can wear the same outfit for a meeting, a wedding, and a funeral.

although wealth is a big factor. it isn't the whole story. a good suit can cost a lot and still be fashionably bankrupt.

And if you try to put some flare, they will question your sexuality and distupt the corporate dynamics.

[–] undergroundoverground@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Tbf, that (dress dark and be boring) was probably due to all the opium/morphine they were on.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

we have better drugs now, why are we still dressing like we are opium addicts??

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AmericanEconomicThinkTank@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

See good buddy that's why you buy yourself thrift.

I wear suits that cost me 20 bucks that look better than what the president wears. Not that that's a high bar, but a worthy comparison.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] beejboytyson@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Remember, the Roman's thought pants were for the effeminate easterners.

[–] AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I do find it weird there's been this resurgence of fixation on superficial motifs being associated with masculinity, but the guys who parrot these views all have an appearance that screams, "I want to blend in and be invisible!"

Nothing masculine about tepid conformity.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] reactionality@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 6 days ago

Casually forgetting that they didn't shower back then.

This is a man vs bear scenario, repainted to make the modern man look like what feminazis view us as. Simple as.

[–] madjo@feddit.nl 3 points 6 days ago

I’m wearing awesome socks. Those are anything but boring!

[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 days ago

Ugh, and this indoor plumbing and daily hygiene is such a chore.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That there is a dandy

load more comments
view more: next ›