this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2025
245 points (99.6% liked)

politics

26226 readers
6617 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

President Donald Trump schemed to keep his violent destruction of the White House’s East Wing hidden from the American public, according to author Michael Wolff.

Rather than weigh the consequences of erasing the 123-year-old building’s history, the president’s first concern was reportedly how to keep its potential destruction hidden from the public.

By the time White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed that Trump had changed his mind about preserving the East Wing, the building had already been reduced to twisted metal and rubble.

top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 72 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Can DC not yank the business license of the company doing the demolition without permits?

[–] tonytins@pawb.social 50 points 1 day ago

The White House invented a loophole out of thin air to avoid going through proper channels.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 18 points 1 day ago

Doubtful. They could try but DC has basically zero political autonomy. They’re essentially an internal colony of the US.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 36 points 1 day ago (1 children)

it’s “been official that this will be called the Trump Ballroom.”

While it will always be the Epstein Ballroom to me, when the Trump name becomes a humiliating stain on US history, wonder what they'll rename it?

[–] GuyFawkes@midwest.social 30 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Fuck renaming it; raze it.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

Yes. If Democrats get into the WH, they should start on day one. Incorporate the destruction of the Epstein ballroom as part of the inauguration.

Fuck norms, fuck the Tone Police, and fuck being doormats for the asshole Confederates.

[–] Jack_Burton@lemmy.ca 4 points 15 hours ago

They'd have to anyway. There's no way of knowing if there is or isn't listening devices or spyware built in. National security would dictate a full tear down I'd imagine.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 hours ago

That's a necessary part of damnatio memoriae, along with removal of every occurrence of Trump's name and image.

[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Imagine the incredible feeling of raw power the excavator operators must have experienced while destroying the White House though.

[–] LordMayor@piefed.social 26 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Would be funny if they were Canadian.

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 20 points 1 day ago

Or a Mexican immigrant

[–] Brown5500@sh.itjust.works 3 points 21 hours ago

They used European equipment at least

Raw $ falling into his pocket, kickbacks from the bribes paid by the company as trump donations.

But we have eyes, and memory recall? Is he missing one or both of these things?

[–] tonytins@pawb.social 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Idiot. There are cameras all over the White House! Of course everyone was going to see your evil scheme.

[–] the_q@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 day ago

I certainly hope there weren't any bodies or documents of note in the East Wing prior to the demo...

[–] 51dusty@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

I hope, one day, we can turn it into low income housing or a dog shelter... one can dream.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 hours ago

Even without any of Epstein disclosures trump is insane, old, bitter and tired and should be removed. It almost seems to me that the democrats are complicit in keeping the trump flame alive. What does this tell us? The obvious answer is that kid diddling is non-partisan.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Assuming true:

I... weirdly am at least really happy that it was intentional destruction and not just complete and utter incompetence with tearing down a single exterior wall?

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It was still complete and utter incompetence. Guaranteed they failed to properly preserve some historical artifacts. Because they didn't have time, there was no visible presence of proper handling by experts. They probably strewed a bunch of asbestos all over the place.

So fear not, there was no sudden burst of competence here.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago

Oh yeah. They 100% destroyed a very countable number of historic arguments and important documents. And likely lost even more to the construction crew and whoever else was around taking souvenirs.

And yeah. Asbestos is 100% a concern and a LOT of people are likely going to have respiratory issues from the clean-up and just being in the area.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 hours ago
[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He should go ahead and tear the whole thing down, since the US government's cooked anyway.

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Tearing down the White House won't change a damn thing about government corruption. But it sure is evidence of government corruption.