this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2025
305 points (97.8% liked)

Science Memes

17268 readers
713 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago (3 children)

engineer here. π is whatever excel gives me for PI()

[–] ghost9@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago (1 children)

=COPILOT("What is the value of PI()?")

[–] ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

As a programmer, I define PI to be 3.05 just to piss off everyone equally

[–] notabot@piefed.social 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I bet you call all of your variables x,y,z and w, and your function 'run', 'doProcess' and 'calculate' too, don't you, you monster!

No, but seriously, even thinking of defining PI as 3.05 is evil.

[–] Test_Tickles@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Yes except swap the function and variable names.

Ugh one of my Devs insisted on using single letter variables all over the place and it annoyed me no end.

[–] monogram@feddit.nl 3 points 1 week ago

Floating point 👻 ooouuu

[–] QuantumTickle@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'll give you 3 guesses what n is

[–] owenfromcanada@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago
[–] j5906@feddit.org 12 points 1 week ago

π^2 = g = 10

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago
[–] DrWorm@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago

e^iπ^ = -3

[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world -4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It's not even a good joke because any engineer who was dumb enough to round pi to 3 would quickly find themselves out of a job. No engineer does this. They either use a pi function, or 3.14

[–] addie@feddit.uk 27 points 1 week ago

Speaking as someone with a chemical engineering degree and twenty years in industry:

  • we have some really complicated computer programs and simulations for all the important stuff, then we add ten percent for safety and round it up to the next standard size. We don't buy 292 mm pipe, we just use 300 mm, because that's what's on the shelves.

  • you need to be able to decide quickly whether results you're seeing are sensible, usually to order-of-magnitude, and whether eg. it will take an hour to fill a tank, or a week. We usually don't care whether it's 55 minutes or 56. You need to be able to do those sums in your head, though.

3 is more than accurate enough as an engineering approximation for pi. In fact, 5 is close enough, and much easier to work with.