this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2025
799 points (98.1% liked)

Science Memes

17229 readers
6764 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

PLEASE CHECK THIS OUT. Our own Aeronmelon is going through some shit at the moment and could use some help. Check it out here and consider an upvote or a comment to push it into activity. Sorry, not something I do often or will be spamming. But I care about my friend and if I can get a couple more eyes on his situation then I'm going to try to do what I can.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Dampyr@piefed.social 80 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 68 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I found this to help me imagine the shape:

collapsed inline media

[–] PaintedSnail@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Wouldn't that make the face on the right non-planar?

[–] scratchee@feddit.uk 6 points 4 days ago

If you’re free to put the center vertex anywhere, then I’d think you could position it to avoid that…

[–] Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That scutoid (possibly all of them, I don't know) is just a pentagonal prism with a corner cut off.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 55 points 4 days ago (4 children)

STOP MAKING NEW SHAPES.

WE HAVE ENOUGH SHAPES.

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 46 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I'm not sure.

My doctor always says that I'm out of shape, so I'm sure I should get a new one

[–] krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 13 points 4 days ago (2 children)

We already have all the shapes we need. Square. Circle. Octagon. Tetrahedron. Tesseract. Penis.

That's enough shapes.

[–] noodly_appendage@lemmy.myserv.one 14 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Did you just skip Hexagons?! Hexagons are the Bestagons!

[–] krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Octagons and hexagons are the same thing. It's right there in the name. Gon. It's okay, many people think they're different shapes, it's a very very common misconception.

[–] noodly_appendage@lemmy.myserv.one 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Oh, I actually didn't know that. Thats a really interesting fact, thanks!

[–] krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Nonagon infinity opens the door.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 days ago

SEE?

END THE MADNESS.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 39 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Finally, they made Polygon 2

[–] Maultasche@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

When will we get Polygon Z?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kanda@reddthat.com 29 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Ah just make it a 3d rectangle and slap a +/-10% on it

[–] AlchemicalAgent@mander.xyz 6 points 4 days ago

Ah, a fellow engineer!

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 20 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] LanguageIsCool@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago

Polygottem lmao

[–] stupidcasey@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Looks like a bunch of triangles to me

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 8 points 4 days ago

Reticulating Splines

[–] Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You may ignore curvature for this assignment

[–] stupidcasey@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

Ma'am before you said that I had already started to convert to a flat earther our education system thanks you.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] salacious_coaster@infosec.pub 11 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

Any teachers here wanna weigh in on the ability of current kids' ability to write complete sentences, let alone calculate the area of this shape?

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago (1 children)

on the ability of current kids’ ability

XD

[–] salacious_coaster@infosec.pub 5 points 4 days ago

-50 persuasion

[–] Droggelbecher@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

Given enough time and known lengths, most of my students should be able to calculate the surface area of this by the time they graduate. They'd just split everything into triangles and quadrangles, use the formula for each, then add everything together. It's not that useful of an exercise though, didactically speaking, because once you grasp that process, it's just repetitive and lengthy. There'd have to be a LOT of given values to make this solvable, too.

On a more subjective note, they can also form sentences. They just don't want to when colloquial speech brings the point across just as well and it's an informal setting. The same is true for most people of all ages in my experience.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 6 points 4 days ago

collapsed inline mediaIncredible

Why would they change shapes!? SHAPES IS SHAPES!

[–] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 days ago

Wasn't this discovered years ago?

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 5 points 4 days ago

Wake up everyone, a new shape just dropped!

[–] butterycroissant@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

honestly not even sure how i remember doing complex math in hs

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (6 children)
[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 days ago

Better than rheumatoid stuff.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

Looks like a pentagon on one side and hexagon on the other, aka soccerball pattern. I would be very surprised if the volumes don't work out close enough just approximating them with [average area of ends] x [length]

[–] Juice@midwest.social 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

So how would you calculate this?

[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

You need the length of each edge. Probably some angles too. Make triangles. Double each triangle into a parallelogram. bh/2 for each one. Sum. Mostly just tedious because there are so many.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›