this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2025
64 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

10601 readers
2172 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.ca 25 points 2 days ago (1 children)

A complete shutdown of the Albertan economy would be amazing. Fuck Smith and the UCP.

[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 day ago

I’m ready. Haven’t heard anything from my local yet though.

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"As the labour movement in this province, our leaders have made a commitment to rise to that challenge, defend the teachers and their rights, defend worker rights more broadly, and to defend our democracy. We have no choice."

[Gil McGowan, president of the Alberta Federation of Labour] stopped short of confirming whether that response would include a provincewide strike, but said, “it’s one of the things that's actively under consideration."

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Passing a law that is explicitly unconstitutional to end a labour dispute is pretty next level. Saying that this is a threat to democracy overall is not hyperbole. If governments think they have that kind of power with that low a bar, we are all in trouble.

[–] LoveCanada@lemmy.ca 4 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

According to the Alberta Institute, it isn't unconstitutional because:

the "notwithstanding clause" is Section 33 of The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, which itself makes up part of our Constitution.

It is a cornerstone of Canada’s constitutional framework, designed to protect the provinces and all Canadians from judicial overreach.

"Parliament or the legislature of a province may expressly declare in an Act of Parliament or of the legislature, as the case may be, that the Act or a provision thereof shall operate notwithstanding a provision included in section 2 or sections 7 to 15 of this Charter."

And provinces would not have signed the Constitution without that clause.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 3 points 21 hours ago

The particular of the constitution that says you don't have to follow the constitution is certainly part of the constitution. I wouldn't say it makes using it constitutional, bit it certainly makes it clear that you don't intend to follow the constitution. I honestly can't think of many valid reasons to use the notwithstanding clause that aren't to address existential threats to our nation or its people, or to trample their constitutiinal rights. I don't think kids having to stay home for a week fits the first category...

[–] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago

The rest of Canada has your back. At least the people do. I can't speak for our governments.

[–] grey_maniac@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Does anyone know who the actual brains and drivers are behind these UCP moves in Alberta? No way it's Marlaina.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Look at people behind separatists. They want to end single payer healthcare indigenous rights and a bunch of other stuff.

[–] grey_maniac@lemmy.ca 2 points 22 hours ago

Who are they, specifically? One cannot come up with strategies to deal with an enemy if only the stooges are known.

[–] excursion22@piefed.ca 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Brains? You think any of these people have the capacity for logical thought?

[–] grey_maniac@lemmy.ca 1 points 22 hours ago

That's my point. There is too much organization behind these to be something these intellectual powerhouses came up with. So who is really driving the bus, and where are they trying to go?

[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

General Strike.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

I'll be on the lookout for a CLC or AFL-endorsed provincial strike fund, I'd chip in. Solidarity means a slight against some workers is a slight against all of us.

[–] orioler25@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Reps shouldn't be able to shutdown strikes so confidently.