this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2025
260 points (90.9% liked)

memes

16018 readers
2474 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 25 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Analyzing the image, the color depth, the level of detail, the overall quality, I'm pretty sure this meme is CIA funded. Don't know how else you could finance it.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 19 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Obviously those are military grade pixels.

[–] droans@midwest.social 7 points 3 months ago

There are only two places in the world that can make that specific shade of red: Kodak Labs and the CIA.

[–] terusgormand8465@lemmings.world 8 points 3 months ago

Yeah, no way else one could fund a meme like this. There totally aren't Free image editors out there that let you put text on a stock image.

[–] LoveSausage@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 months ago

Yea I mean don't you guys get the nice CIA , comrade XI pays us handsomely. Or at least so I've heard

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

I’m pretty sure this meme is CIA funded.

I mean, you joke. But the number of "If you criticize the American Police State, you're a violent bully" posts on every corner of the internet from accounts with those procedurally generated 4-digit suffixes is a wee bit sus.

You see the same shit from anti-Luigi memes, anti-piracy memes, and anti-Linux memes. They just aren't well received.

[–] Rooty@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago (2 children)

If you're going to be a radical leftist, be the "liberalism has betrayed the working class" instead of "daddy Stalin's cum tastes nice 🥵".

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The concept of Liberalism is literally the same as supporting human rights.

[–] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 months ago

The two of you swapped your L's

"Liberalism" is the right-wing one the OP meant, "liberalism" is the overarching concept that is more commonly called "leftism" these days because of the whole "a party called the Liberals existed and were right wing" thing

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

I gotta ask, what exactly is the difference between the Obama "Dronestrikes On Arabs Is Never Wrong" Dickrider Liberal and the Stalinist "driving over Hungarian fascists with your tank is cool af, aktuly" Leftist?

Because I hear a lot about these Far-Left Tankies. But then I see Western so-called Progressives flood their shorts every time we sodomize leadership in Libya with a rusty knife or carpet bomb hospitals in Gaza or unleash another wave of hack mercenaries on Venezuela. Hell, even MacArthur's saturation bombing of the Korean Peninsula gets love. Does anyone actually oppose foreign military interventionism? Or is it just taboo when a leftist military leader does it?

[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The first group actually doesn’t really exist AND the group that gets assigned to that category tends to agree that extrajudicial air strikes are bad.

If the first group actually existed in the way they get categorized and imagined they’d be equally as bad, if not worse for being that dumb in a society where they are “allowed” to know better and think differently, vocally.

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Does anyone actually oppose foreign military interventionism?

...Why would you? That's the right thing to do sometimes. We could have totally stayed on the sidelines in WWII in Europe, and only gone to war in the Pacific, because that shit was absolutely not our problem, right?

We should, for instance, be intervening in Myanmar, and in Rojava. We should be protecting the Kurds--esp. since we said we would--from Syria and Turkiye. We should be helping the rebels in Myanmar, since they're just trying to get basic human rights from a dictatorial military regime.

Does that mean that the US is perfect? Absofuckinglutely no. Not even close. Is capitalism great? Nope. Is authoritarian communism better? LOL, no.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Does that mean that the US is perfect?

This appears to be the root of it. America gets some sort of ideological benefit-of-the-doubt, such that My Lai Massacres and engineered famines in Cuba and Korea and blacksite prisons that use genital mutilation to extract confessions are degrees shy of perfection rather than war crimes, atrocities, and holocausts.

Is authoritarian communism better? LOL, no.

Is your problem with the authoritarianism or the communism?

“The very concept of "revolutionary violence" is somewhat falsely cast, since most of the violence comes from those who attempt to prevent reform, not from those struggling for reform. By focusing on the violent rebellions of the downtrodden, we overlook the much greater repressive force and violence utilized by the ruling oligarchs to maintain the status quo, including armed attacks against peaceful demonstrations, mass arrests, torture, destruction of opposition organizations, suppression of dissident publications, death squad assassinations, the extermination of whole villages, and the like.”

― Michael Parenti, Blackshirts and Reds: Rational Fascism and the Overthrow of Communism

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Lol, LMAO even, I'm getting my popcorn! 🍿🍿

[–] terusgormand8465@lemmings.world 23 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Waiting for the ML trolls to come out of the woodwork complaining about how I'm evil or whatever

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

Lol it's already happening, yay for fresh tags xD

[–] OmegaLemmy@discuss.online 7 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Wish the tankies were less coping about human right failures but instead learning to improve from studying them, but I guess the global world order against communism is causing everyone to be their enemy so it's only normal

[–] HakFoo@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

There are two issues with human rights.

One is selective enforcement. There are a long list of countries with abysmal human rights records, but it's too strategically convenient or economically essential to look the other way. Whrn was the last time they made a fuss about Jamal Khashoggi? Human rights only gets invoked when sabre-rattling is useful, not as a solid and consistent moral framework.

The other is that it's a "luxury product". Can every country support a modern human-rights model, or does it require a certain level of economic and political stability? It's hard to maintain rule of law amid active insurgency, or if you can't even deploy the bureaucratic state. Once you've gotten past that threshold, will both leaders and the broader population be eager to switch from the system that got them where they are? You've got to convince people that being able to write an anti-government op-ed is more important than security, or the price of eggs. This is a long term soft sell: berating countries for not measuring up to Western standards isn't going to get them to make that choice any faster.

[–] OmegaLemmy@discuss.online 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You have a point, i wonder if Russia could have industrialised as fast if it didn't make use of every labor and resources present

Not to mention that communist societies have been scrutinized, down to every atom, especially because it contrasts fully with capitalism

My personal belief is better reform than revolution, but with an imperialist power like USA and maybe even Russia and China if you count them it is essentially impossible.

[–] spooky2092@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

but with an imperialist power like USA and maybe even Russia and China if you count them

It would be silly to discount Russia and China's imperialism. They're both on the level of the US, they just lack the power projection to be as bad as the US. But the actions they've taken with the level of power projection they have show that fact.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

The anticommunism crowd is weaker than its ever been, the problem is Tankies don't support any real communism just dictatorship.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Tankies fr just the worst, they're the number one downside to Lemmy.

[–] terusgormand8465@lemmings.world 2 points 3 months ago

Yeah I agree, tankies are the worst. Fuck tankies!

[–] Vopyr@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago
[–] Irelephant@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Ok, nobody from ml or grad yet.

[–] terusgormand8465@lemmings.world 7 points 3 months ago (2 children)

world defederates grad. I did see one on the ml version of this post though.

[–] Irelephant@lemm.ee 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I remember .ml once unbanned someone, and then rebanned them, so that a post they made would federate to them.

[–] terusgormand8465@lemmings.world 5 points 3 months ago

That seems weird and also slightly on the abusive side, literally unbanning and rebanning just to make a post come through.

[–] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

If my instance is not federated with ml, then I don't see them at all anywhere?

I tried blocking their instances, but I still have to suffer them (even here). I an open to move instances if I can stop seeing those genocidals

[–] Siethron@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Speaking of CIA, I sometimes wonder if MKULTRA V2 was ever done and more successfully. Possibly used on people like Fetterman to help serve billionaire backer interests.