this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2025
220 points (99.5% liked)

Europe

5107 readers
1618 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in !yurop@lemm.ee. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)

(This list may get expanded when necessary.)

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the mods: @federalreverse@feddit.org, @poVoq@slrpnk.net, or @anzo@programming.dev.

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
 

France's constitutional court on Friday ruled local politicians can be barred from office immediately if convicted of a crime, leaving the door open for far-right leader Marine Le Pen to potentially be barred from the 2027 presidential race in an embezzlement trial concluding on Monday.

all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Affidavit@lemm.ee 37 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The ruling means far-right leader Marine Le Pen could face a five-year political ban if her party is convicted in an ongoing embezzlement trial.

My dream is to one day read a news article about a court decision that actually has final concrete repercussions, and not something that will likely end up with 2-3 more appeals later down the track.

[–] rippersnapper@lemm.ee 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Why should a politician convicted of stealing money ever be allowed in a position of power? Why not just ban her for life?

[–] Noodle07@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Previous mayor of my city went to prison for corruption during his mandate. Dude gets second place on the last mayor election 😑

[–] petrescatraian@libranet.de 31 points 4 days ago

@zaxvenz One of the few moments I'm proud of my country. Probably the annulment of elections last autumn here made other European countries aware that not anyone can run for a public office if they act against democracy. We also had another candidate that was barred from entry two times, but that one was more prominent than Călin-Russian-wisdom-Georgescu.

collapsed inline media

[–] AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 27 points 4 days ago (3 children)

It's time Le Pen signed off.

[–] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 4 days ago

Bardella is not better.

[–] jimmy90@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

I see what you did there

[–] jenesaisquoi@feddit.org 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's time the NSFAP fucked off.

[–] Tomassci@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

National Socialist Fappers Allowing Pedophilia

[–] jenesaisquoi@feddit.org 2 points 2 days ago

Nationalsozialistische Französische Arbeiterpartei

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)

5 year politican ban... without instant removal of parliament...

instead of at least 5 years prison...

for fraud...

teh fuck

[–] troglodyte_mignon@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago

It’s not "instead of", it’s "in addition to". And it’s not "at least" 5 years of prison either, it could end up being less than what the prosecution asked for.

[–] Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I like this, I’m in favor of an aesthetically liberal state that is in fact not liberal because it is openly hostile to illiberal ideas. But before you agree with me, bear in mind that most illiberal ideas arise from religion, so the state needs to be hostile to religion, like France. Although not being French I do not know the extent of laicité. In my model I think that would mean that no one who openly practices any religion could hold any legislative office. And culturally I would wage soft war against Islam, sorry but it’s just not compatible. It was designed as a religion and a political and legal system, so it cannot be reformed unless a complete breakaway from the Quran happens and I don’t see that happening.

[–] troglodyte_mignon@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

How is your comment related to the article? This trial isn’t about the National Rally’s ideas (which are indeed illiberal, fundamentally racist and plainly disgusting). It’s about them embezzling millions of euros from the European Parliament, during more than a decade, by having many of their members be "fake" MEP assistants who got paid for a job that they didn’t actually do. WTF does this have to do with religion or illiberalism.

Although not being French I do not know the extent of laicité.

Indeed you do not. Laïcité, among other things, guarantees the right to believe in (or not believe in) and practice (or not practice) a religion. What you’re proposing is religious discrimination, not laïcité.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Good thing you're not in any kind of political office then, because that would be an authoritarian state masquerading as a democracy.

[–] Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Democracy has never, not once in the history of democracy, meant that every one gets to participate. That’s the idea of it, but it’s not the reality of it. The concept of citizens is there to explicitly denominate those who can and can’t participate in it.