this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2025
513 points (100.0% liked)

Uplifting News

16697 readers
665 users here now

Welcome to /c/UpliftingNews (rules), a dedicated space where optimism and positivity converge to bring you the most heartening and inspiring stories from around the world. We strive to curate and share content that lights up your day, invigorates your spirit, and inspires you to spread positivity in your own way. This is a sanctuary for those seeking a break from the incessant negativity and rage (e.g. schadenfreude) often found in today's news cycle. From acts of everyday kindness to large-scale philanthropic efforts, from individual achievements to community triumphs, we bring you news—in text form or otherwise—that gives hope, fosters empathy, and strengthens the belief in humanity's capacity for good, from a quality outlet that does not publish bad copies of copies of copies.

Here in /c/UpliftingNews, we uphold the values of respect, empathy, and inclusivity, fostering a supportive and vibrant community. We encourage you to share your positive news, comment, engage in uplifting conversations, and find solace in the goodness that exists around us. We are more than a news-sharing platform; we are a community built on the power of positivity and the collective desire for a more hopeful world. Remember, your small acts of kindness can be someone else's big ray of hope. Be part of the positivity revolution; share, uplift, inspire!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bassomitron@lemmy.world 82 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

And anti vaxxers will make some bullshit claim, making idiots believe it, and it'll only halfway eliminate HIV.

[–] jumperalex@lemmy.world 55 points 15 hours ago

Not just them, but the religious fuckers who want everyone to suffer "consequences" for the sin of sex. Same ones that freak out about HPV vaccine.

I know there is a lot of overlap. But it isn't total.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 12 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

At least this way you can save most of the smart ones.

[–] Nomad@infosec.pub 2 points 3 hours ago

Religious people often have smart kids. They need protection.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 2 points 4 hours ago

You know what, if you have HIV and throw your lot in with them then you've only got yourself to blame. If they had their way they'd throw you down a well for having it.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 58 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

generic versions of a groundbreaking injectable drug to prevent HIV

The two organisations have entered into separate agreements with Indian pharmaceutical companies to produce cheaper generic versions of lenacapavir – a twice-yearly injection shown to reduce the risk of HIV transmission by more than 99.9 percent – for [more than 100] low- and middle-income countries.

Marketed under the brand name Yeztugo by California-based Gilead Sciences, lenacapavir currently costs around $28,000 a year in the United States.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Fuck...

Why can't we have nice things?

[–] BossDj@piefed.social 2 points 1 hour ago

You know why

[–] MangioneDontMiss@feddit.nl 45 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

40 dollars in low income countries. 28,000 dollars in the united states. The drug is made in the united states.

WTF.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 24 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Makes you wonder if Trump has a point.

But thanks to RFK and Trump, there will be no more drugs like this in the future. Gilead did the trials, but 95% of the effort behind this was NIH funded. We can't even guess how many game changing drugs have been cut in 2025.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 14 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

As always Trump completely misunderstands the situation. Yes there’s a point in how exepnsive drugs are in the us, especially relative to other countries. But whether it’s manufactured in the us has almost nothing to do with it.

The problem is recovering all the development costs from American patients, and more recently just charging what they think the market will bear. We have to fix the complex maze of healthcare and all the levels of profiteering, we have to fix how development costs can be recovered and most of all we need to fix charging what the market will bear. Has everyone already forgotten the outcry over insulin a few years ago. A ceo who should be in jail decided to start charging ten or twenty times the cost, because he could, because us patients are a captive market. Then got away with saying “some of you can use these coupons….”. There’s definitely a point where exploitive business practices have crossed the line and should be considered criminal acts

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 hours ago

The problem is recovering all the development costs

Yeeeaaahhh, but no.

There is also a huge amount of plain greed in there, drug companies aren't exactly known for being very generous to put it mildly. Cost of healthcare in the US is beyond insanely expensive and that isn't just because Americans are rich, the vast majority aren't and for many, getting sick is not only a death sentence, it's also a death sentence to the family as they'll be stuck with the medical bills that will bankrupt them.

The US healthcare system is beyond fucked up with corruption and just plain extortion. Wanna live? Say, that's a nice first born you have there!

[–] LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world -4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I figured this would come up but you've gotta remember that drugs are expensive as hell to develop. And it just received US approval in June so it's not like they have been sitting on this making money for years.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 15 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (3 children)

The cost of drug development is vastly overstated as an excuse. The reality is $100-200M, but pharma expects $14B++ in returns. Little of that goes back into basic research.

The front end of costs was spent by the NIH, and after that was ended, Pharma is not taking up the slack. It's not sustainable and pharma will die in a decade.

[–] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 9 points 6 hours ago

Yeah, a lot of these drug companies have ad budgets larger than the R&D budget, but any overhead is used to jack up the prices. I swear ads are sold at inflated prices for the sake of being able to sell high.

[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Just because development of a single drug costs not that much does not mean you don't need to pay for failed drugs too. If many drugs die during trials someone gotta pay for that. Profitability is a better indicator for greed.

[–] Confused_Emus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Gilead’s own words show they aren’t hurting in the least for profits. It’s definitely greed.

[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 1 points 3 hours ago

You must look at the whole sector as failures sink companies but yes.

[–] LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

I'd like to see some sources on those numbers, I couldn't find any of that when I searched.

[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 22 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Oh no! Quick! Cut their Funding!

-The USA!

[–] chiocciola@lemmy.cafe 6 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

No no, keep their funding but make a Pharmaceutical company around it and only release pills with enough potency to treat instead of cure

[–] NickwithaC@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago

"Hey Jimmy, you weren't at work yesterday"

"oh, my AIDS was acting up but I took some Rubitussin, I'm fine now."

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 21 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

"We can end HIV":

...as long as we can convince everyone to take it. So, yeah. Good luck with that.

[–] CXORA@aussie.zone 2 points 5 hours ago

You don't need to convince everyone, just enough people.

Were already seeing really good progress with pills and condoms, so an option which doesn't need to be taken on a strict daily schedule will be a huge boon.

[–] Confused_Emus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 4 hours ago

Generic versions of a groundbreaking injectable HIV-prevention drug should be available for $40 a year in more than 100 countries from 2027, Unitaid and the Gates Foundation said Wednesday.

Marketed under the brand name Yeztugo by California-based Gilead Sciences, lenacapavir currently costs around $28,000 a year in the United States.

FUCK GILEAD

[–] titanicx@lemmy.zip 6 points 5 hours ago

But what about the Tylenol?

[–] altkey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

The Gates Foundation also announced Wednesday that it had entered into a similar partnership with Indian pharmaceutical company Hetero.

That's for bigots to not being ashamed of taking pills against sexually transmited diseases? See, Hetero is in it's very name, so it's fine!

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

That’s ok, I’m sure it won’t be allowed to sell in the us. Profits will be intact

[–] rapchee@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 10 points 3 hours ago

Yeah I hate to say it, but I worked in HIV prevention in the late 2000s, and we really thought prep was going to be the end of HIV, along with rigorous testing and linkage to care.

Since then, HIV rates have exploded in many areas, silently, because we've gone fully regressive on sex ed.

I have friends that became HIV positive before they even knew about prep.

WTF happened.

[–] Link@feddit.nl 5 points 3 hours ago

We can :) But, we probably won't :(

[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 4 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

$40.

What, are you crazy?

I don't have that kind of money!

[–] palordrolap@fedia.io 1 points 1 hour ago

Then you should have sex with as many rich people as possible then die as quickly and quietly as possible, there's a good chap.

Best regards, Your corporate overlords