this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2025
93 points (97.0% liked)

politics

25872 readers
3257 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Seriously, wtf is wrong with him now???

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 64 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The party of no taxes really loves to tax people.

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 24 points 3 days ago

You didn't read the fine print. It's the party of no taxes*

*^for rich people^

[–] xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 53 points 3 days ago

"You know what will fix America's problems? Infinite new taxes on absolutely everything!"

-- Republicans, apparently

[–] plantsmakemehappy@lemmy.world 29 points 3 days ago (1 children)

imposing a 50 percent tariff on “all kitchen cabinets, bathroom vanities, and associated products,” as well as a 30 percent tariff on upholstered furniture beginning Oct. 1st.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 8 points 3 days ago

If associated products means anything that could go into making a cabinet, like fixtures or even the parts of a cabinet that might still have to be imported, then he's making domestic expensive too, nullifying anything. It's possible that he may end up eventually being the only person in the US who doesn't understand the effects of a tariff. Idiot.

[–] Blackfeathr@lemmy.world 26 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Ah yes, nothing says "National Security Threat" like Swedish cabinetry.

[–] chiocciola@lemmy.cafe 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Well, Norwegian Wood was a song about burning a house down.

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 2 points 3 days ago

Oh is that what it's about? I thought it was about a romantic encounter in Norway 😳

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 16 points 3 days ago

Once again I need to quote this unknown journalist from 2017:

“They voted for the elephant in the china shop. Little did they realize that they were the china.”

[–] HakFoo@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 3 days ago

So some domestic firm with a terrible, non competitive product fellated him. Did we see a pressboard trophy to go with Apple's glass one?

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

“The reason for this is the large scale ‘FLOODING’ of these products into the United States by other outside Countries,” he wrote. “It is a very unfair practice, but we must protect, for National Security and other reasons, our Manufacturing process.”

[–] Bwaz@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Something to do with being other than attention to the Epstein files.

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I’d join the discussion but the article is paywalled

[–] habitualTartare@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] Dionysus@leminal.space 1 points 3 days ago

Thank God the only person who can bypass a paywall showed up!

/s

This abject moron will had no fixing clue how tariffs work and how to use them not like an idiot.

IKEA is not going to give a flying fuck about this.