this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2025
127 points (97.7% liked)

World News

49786 readers
2564 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 73 points 18 hours ago (4 children)

Those canals are.... Disgusting. Hopefully the dysentery they contract was worth it.

[–] palordrolap@fedia.io 17 points 18 hours ago

I was going to suggest putting something in the water that would discourage swimming, but I guess it needs to be worse than whatever's already in there... and not kill the wildlife. That's a fine line if it exists at all.

[–] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 7 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I thought I read that the canals cleaned up quite a bit after COVID, due to no tourists being around. Are they back to being disgusting?

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Yeah during the first lockdown they were pretty clear. The thing is that they're incredibly shallow and muddy, and Venetians use boats as their main mode of transport (after walking) so it never settles usually

collapsed inline mediavenice canals in March 2020

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago

Lockdown cleaned up a lot of things, but only temporarily, because our species fucking sucks.

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 15 hours ago

They really really are. I don't know how anyone with more braincells than teeth could look at that water and want to swim in it

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 35 points 19 hours ago

Best to think of the canals like an open sewer.

[–] LedgeDrop@lemmy.zip 23 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

When I visited Venice, we had some whitewater kayaks with us in the car. We thought it would be a really memorable and unique experience to kayak around the canals of Venice.

Then we got there (in late summer) and took one look at the water and said "nope, I'm not dipping my toe in that toxic mess."

... and I do not regret that decision.

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

It would have been a terrible idea anyways, and illegal for a reason. Those canals are proper roads, they are narrow and have actual traffic like DHL/UPS boats, taxis, cranes, people commuting, police, ambulances, etc. No, the ambulance is not a quirky thing, regular ones and helicopters are not really an option.

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 7 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Why is swimming in the canal such a terrible thing, anyway?

[–] Confused_Emus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 12 hours ago

There’s poo in there.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 4 points 18 hours ago

No one tells me to put clothes on.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 2 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

My in-laws retired after a lifetime of union work - carpenter and nurse. It's given them a retirement that has let them, among other things, go to Venice 4 times.

But they're model Canadians and I think they'd be the least likely to block a through-way or make a spectacle of themselves. But they realize that just walking through the city has impact just from their mere presence.

It's too late for them but I get why they'd go back. Venezians (Venetians?) are cursed with a beautiful city and it makes their existence a struggle because tourists are dinks. I grew up in a tourist town and I hate tourists even when I am one, and even though to try to represent my polite country reputation as well as I can.

Can we consider going in the off-season? How can we preserve the city for future citizens and visitors?

Can we please drastically raise the price for everything and then award the residents a monthly stipend to completely offset it as well as using the rest for maintenance and restoration of the exteriors while we improve the infrastructure? I don't mean to sound posh, because it's more a value proposition: I'd pay extra to be able to go, if it means that extra revenue will allow that to happen. I'm willing to wait until I can foot the bigger bill, even if that means I never get to go.

Is there a better idea that allows the activity of selfish people like me who want to one day see it, preserve it for people like me; but most importantly for the residents who have to suffer my gawking and smiling for a week?

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

Throw them in prison for a year. It'll stop real quick