The administration:
this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2025
376 points (99.7% liked)
politics
25634 readers
3434 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Trump's angry, calling it a hoax. It's nice that he likes to confirm the crazy/sleezy shit like that.
Watching his Spokes-Barbie trying to clarify what the explanation was to call that a "hoax" was high comedy.
Regardless of the content, that’s a really shitty birthday book.
I can't even read half the shit in there
Why aren't they showing the entire thing? It's missing the 8 or 9ish y.o. girl and a toddler. It's also missing some incriminating writings. See for yourself.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rR1BzSxbCkV6LGWTUJuIoze_xSvzOfUD/view
I am always about seeing the proof, but this is one link I won't click.
They've covered the faces, but it it's not great. I'm going to put a trigger warning on the young girl and toddler, but the rest is okay, you won't see anything unless you read it or really look at it. This is just what I've gone through so far, I could only take so much.
In section called children and he isn't known to have any children
underage maybe?
It's quite heavily redacted.
use proton drive or something
I think we should also point out the Google drive link.
I'm on enough lists
Is there any info on what page 218 (the fully redacted page) is?
given the pictures on 216 and 217, i'm going to guess a full page nude
Shit, even redacted is fucking disturbing.
Wasn't planning to see a zebra creampie today
I was, just not on the guardian
I am also going to the zoo...dressed as a sultry lady zebra!!
Is it just me, or have a lot of these posts been taken down today? Let's hope this one survives.
It fell off the front page pretty quickly, but this is still up.
Is it? It might take down the guy who murdered him.
That's not a bad birthday gift. Except for the whole getting murdered part, but that's already done.
I know one I commented in just a few hours ago has since mysteriously disappeared...
"Mysteriously" why not check the mod log? News@lemmy.world has rules that they have to be actual news sources, not the MeidasTouch post on Meta's Threads app.
I posted on that same one, but I looked at the modlog and the mod who removed it asked to use an actual news source or just post that source in a more appropriate community.
This kind of conspiratorial thinking doesn't help us.
News rule in question:
From the modlog:
In my defense, I didn't know I was able to check the mod log, nor am I aware of how to do so, so my bad... I just remembered seeing the post and being disgusted, I couldn't even tell you what sub it was in.
And yea, maybe I was a little hasty in labeling it 'mysterious' but considering we currently have a senile pedophile in the white house who seems determined to be the next Kim Jung Il and is only too happy to rewrite history while siccing his clown shoes gestapo on people indiscriminately, I'd say if there's a time to be paranoid, this is fucking it.
Remember: he didn't kill himself
Why am I hearing so much about this fucking guy's birthday card? Just release the papers already
Because it's relevant. There's some damning stuff in here. Read the PDFs.
This is part of the papers you want to see released.
sex fanatics are fucking weird