this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2025
771 points (99.6% liked)

politics

25558 readers
2674 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world 176 points 2 days ago (3 children)

That came after the United States Tennis Association sent a memo to media partners requesting that they censor “disruptions or reactions” in response to Trump. “We ask all broadcasters to refrain from showcasing any disruptions or reactions in response to the President’s attendance in any capacity,” the USTA said in the memo.

[–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 118 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's funny to read yesterday's headline, aka this quote, and then read today's headline. Everyone is going to boo him tomorrow, please don't talk about it. He was in fact boo'ed, let's talk about it.

I guess funny is the wrong word. Insanity?

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

boo'ed

It's just "booed". Really-really.

[–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's good to know. It just looked so weird. I knew what I wrote was also weird, but it felt less weird.

[–] MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

Basically apostrophes are never used to separate a word from a normal suffix in this kind of novel or unusual construction. Pretty much just use apostrophes for contractions and (most) possessives. Example: 90s, not 90's.

--

Edit: In English, for English words. Some languages, either those normally rendered in Latin script* or transliterated into it**, make use of apostrophes either to modify an adjacent phoneme or to indicate particular sounds or a glottal stop.

* English-like letters and punctuation

** Like Japanese written as if it were English, for example "Ohayo gozaimasu" which is written in hiragana as おはようございま.

Source: Amateur with the dangerous amount of a little knowledge

--

Edit2: Others point out (correctly) that referencing the 1990s as a decade would be properly written as '90s, which is still a use of an apostrophe for a contraction.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (4 children)

And, actually, I believe it’s ‘90s! So there is one, it’s right in front.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] brown567@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

In this case, '90s would be more appropriate because you're removing the first half of the year

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

This is what happens when you involve yourself in someone's war against reality and rational thinking

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 43 points 1 day ago

Nice to see the US Tennis Association bending over preemptively.

[–] burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de 72 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Booing is pretty tame and lame, honestly.

[–] Theoriginalthon@lemmy.world 113 points 2 days ago (16 children)

Tame but effective, imagine if everywhere you went and everything you did there was a crowd booing you.

[–] burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de 60 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I'd much rather it be a giant crowding shouting "child rapist" while throwing anything they could get their hands on at him.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 38 points 2 days ago (1 children)

while more impactful, that takes more prep time and work. there is a magic to booing. it is uncontrollable, unstoppable, and requires no thought. it gives everyone a free space in which to enter into a grand vocalization of "we stand for what you do not." there is no real way to boo performatively. there is too little room for interpretation within the reverberations of the crowd.

if you do not like booing the 47th president of the united states, i recommend digging into what the problem with the act is, and consider that there's many routes to resistance. for me, i don't like booing the president because the president is meant to be a spectacle. it doesn't matter if you love or hate him. it matters that you feel strongly. the argument i can hear is that you want to increase another kind of spectacle to give the people something to engage in. me, i want to remove him from all spectacle he engages in from my life and focus on community engagement. there is likely valor to both.

but please. consider that better than throwing things at him, giving him the spectacle he thrives in, might be when he appears at an event you are at, that means you don't care about the org that let him in in the first place anymore. get up out of your seat, and make your way to the exit, never to return again.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SARGE@startrek.website 5 points 1 day ago

I mean, I personally wouldn't ask people to throw guns at him.

What's in the gun, however...

[–] akilou@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 day ago

And now imagine you have narcissistic personality disorder and it hits so much harder

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Can't be as bad as MAGA actively destroying everything I've ever held dear about this country

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Imagine if you're the dictator of the wealthiest and most powerful nation in human history.

A few boos from folks in the cheap seats seems like a small price to pay when you can feast on the townsfolk every night with abandon.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 32 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yet basically all dictators have been harsh on even the lightest of protests, since if you allow it, the protests will grow until you can't deal with it.

Public protests like these are highly useful to fight against Mr. Trump.

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Just look how effective calling them weird was.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Oh yeah, keep attacking their masculinity, that is one of their biggest weakpoints.

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I don't think the 'weird' thing was really about masculinity. Conservatives value conformity, which is why they mock expressiveness like dyed hair; they think they are the default, and so being called weird and the insult sticking because they are fucking weird really hits them where it hurts

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't think anyone is arguing that this is changing anything. Just that it's funny.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago

You have heard that Donnie has the most fragile ego possible, right? Mass dissent he can directly witness is far more effective than you think.

[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What else are you gonna do at a tennis match?

[–] simplejack@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Aim a ball machine at his inflamed cankles

It’s tame but not lame. Every little bit helps. If it bruised his ego even a little bit, it’s a win.

[–] trager_bombs@lemmy.world 70 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Hope the next guy doesn't miss. Boos don't accomplish shit.

[–] regedit@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Every act of resistance, no matter how small, advances our cause and diminishes their control.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Th3D3k0y@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Ohhh Jack Black is going to cancel your tour

[–] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Still waiting to find out that the first incident was a setup. Wouldn't be surprised to learn they found an individual desiring suicide by cop to do it and sacrificed a random magat for the cause.

That is, if it's ever actually investigated.

[–] Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Funny how they don't talk about it anymore eh?

I'm thinking blatant setup

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pedz@lemmy.ca 51 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Those responsible for the booing will be found and deported to El Salvador.

Thank you for your attention to this matter!

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 day ago

Smithers...have the Rolling Stones killed.

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 42 points 1 day ago

The Sinner-Alcaraz match

OH COME ON. YOU CAN NOT MAKE THIS SHIT UP.

[–] Bebopalouie@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 day ago
[–] gribzy_uk@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

I was saying boo-urns.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Whatever happened to the free speech maximalists?

[–] MangioneDontMiss@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

need to start doing more than just booing.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Did anyone actually watch the clip? Am I going crazy? It's like 20% boos and 80% applause. Very misleading title IMO.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Could've been a bit more excitement to an otherwise boring sport if they had allowed them to be seen

load more comments
view more: next ›