Search any scientific paper site for "Certainly!" and hundreds pop up, where ChatGPT was clearly used. Not for translation, but for answering questions related to the paper itself.
this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2025
154 points (97.5% liked)
Technology
74901 readers
3006 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
154
We risk a deluge of AI-written ‘science’ pushing corporate interests – here’s what to do about it
(theconversation.com)
We need to pay scientists to do peer review and reproduction studies, it's negligent for any organization to fund novel research only and not also contribute to error correction and resilience when LLMs are now available. If you can't pay for it at least release the data for reproducing the analysis. To do neither should be seen as incomplete and suspicious.
Science is already well perverted by trade groups hiring organizations to commission studies to start backwards from it is safe to put out flawed conclusions lobbyists get policy makers to accept as valid and allow big money their practices.
Worse though it will become the system has been fundamentally broken since before most of us were born. Pfas, atrazine, roundup, a million other poisons are dumped and used systematically with the science of these cynical researchers to wave around.
It is all getting worse already. Watersheds are near all sullied to some degree at this point, many of which are on centuries long water cycles, there is no unpoisoning many, just as water is becoming scarcer and overused more by monied interests.
I only made it one paragraph deep.
You have got to find your missing words
What?
You are missing words in your post and it is hard to read because of it.
Rereading what I wrote, I can see that I probably came off like an asshole, not my intention.
You've got missing parts
Not words, punctuation and composition. Your comment is difficult to read.
2025 has clankers resmearching.