this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2025
451 points (97.5% liked)

Political Memes

9390 readers
2691 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Edit: Replaced PayPal with Starlink

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] zarathustra0@lemmy.world 53 points 3 days ago (1 children)

TBF the Nazis were pretty instrumental in the development of rockets.

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 16 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Yes, we know. At least I hope. Doesnt mean we have to continue

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 35 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I don't know why it's so hard to get people to care about things. It's not like twitter is some vital service. But people are just like, "meh, it's funny." What tepid slop do these people have where their soul should be?

[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I went to a gay camp earlier this year and a couple of the RVs had starlinks. They don't care and they don't think their dollars matter.

In fact I had a whole chat with my boss today about Chick Filet, he asked if I was boycotting (and said his gay daughter is too). He then launched into this spiel about how you're always supporting evil somehow so it doesn't matter.

I'm like, yeah but not one penny of my money goes to them, and that's all I can care about.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

When this comes up, which isn't that often, I typically ask them where the line is. Like, presumably there's something a company could do that's so evil that they wouldn't support it. What is it, for them? Crushing babies live on TV? That's probably too far, right? So then we can sort of do a binary search between that line and where we are, and try to find what is too much for them. I suspect for many people it's "am I personally, immediately, harmed by this, in a way I can't rationalize?"

[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Oh I like this, thank you.

[–] RisingSwell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Boycotting everything evil is hard because there's so much.

Like, I avoid nestle, musk and Zuckerberg, and mostly avoid Amazon, but I'm still definitely paying evil billionaires for a bunch of my other shit.

[–] BigBenis@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

The difference is that you make the conscious decision to define your values and be intentional about them rather than to abandon them entirely to mindless complicity.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Have you watched "The Good Place"? It does a pretty good job diving into the ethical minefield that is modern life (specifically even mentioning Chick Fil A)

[–] ILoveUnions@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

The good place is quite reductive towards the actual issue, encouraging consumerism without regards to consequences, no?

[–] BigBenis@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

It's inconvenient to voluntarily abstain from things and many people aren't prepared to face that so they make excuses to justify their indiscipline.

[–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Human brains are sadly very predisposed to convenience over spending extra effort, especially when that convenience is the established norm; we tend to resist change unless that extra effort will bring a noticeable and immediate personal benefit. Degrees of separation from the act and the harm is also a big factor, most people stop thinking beyond a certain point and just go "it's not that deep".

It takes a lot of education and introspection about complex topics to understand how the "harder way" is actually cumulatively easier and brings more benefits but that also brings with it accepting certain truths one used to believe about the fundamental workings of the world they based all of their actions and even their identity on are actually falsehoods but the brain really, really hates that.

This is a key concept in writing enforceable legislation to get people to change habits. Had to learn about it in a class for my degree for wildlife conservation. The way is somehow exploiting how the way our brains work to trick them into believing that the decision to change is not only the best and easiest option but also that it was their idea to do so in order to allow their brain to handwave any inconsistency in their internal logic instead of fighting against their cognitive dissonance trying to change it by force.

Generally, people aren't bad people, they are just dumb primates who are trying their damnedest to live as easily as possible with the least amount of conflict while still feeling that they and their loved ones are protected from perceived harm. They "care" but they don't really think about what that means beyond a very, very limited scope of their immediate existence. After a certain point, arbitrary to each individual that will change at any given moment, they begin to wonder what it all has to do with the price of tea in China.

So don't convince them to care about the price of tea but instead how the price of tea will affect something they do care about in their lives.

[–] Angelusz@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago
[–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It doesn't personally affect them and or they have more pressing shit happening in the day-to-day

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago

It's not like twitter is some vital service.

Well, unless you're an indie artist.

[–] tyler@programming.dev 23 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Musk doesn’t own PayPal, nor any shares of it. It’s owned by eBay.

[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 26 points 3 days ago (1 children)

And yet. Peter Thiel is also a Nazi, so using PayPal still benefits Nazis.

[–] tyler@programming.dev 13 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Thiel ~~was kicked out of~~ sold PayPal. Where are yall getting this PayPal connection with nazis? Sheesh.

Edit: sorry I had that backwards. Musk was kicked out, thiel sold. Back in 2002. Literally 23 years ago.

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Thank you. I've replaced PayPal with starlink

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Oh so this is a Photoshop? For a moment I thought Teslas were hacked and showing these messages to everyone. That would have been neat.

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

This is Lemmy. This content was GIMPed. I wouldn't even pirate Adobe products.

I tried to match a picture of a Tesla error as much as possible however.

collapsed inline media

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (4 children)

"Photoshop" is a verb. No need for the pedantry. You know what I meant.

[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 days ago

I’m with you. “This is shopped” will never leave usage for me

[–] Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Oh so this is a Photoshop?

Looks like a noun to me, dawg.

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Please refer to the last two sentences in my previous comment.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago

That's... Well, I don't like eBay, but it's better eLon.

[–] UrPartnerInCrime@sh.itjust.works 19 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Musk hasn't been involved with PayPal for over 20 years. He lost his job as ceo over 20 years ago. The last dealing he had with them was having to pay them like almost $200 mill or something to have the x domain again

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 11 points 3 days ago

Thank you, updated.

[–] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Don't give money to Nazis no matter what.

But it does help that each and everyone of those brand objectively suck in their respective field.

[–] traches@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago

Objectively not true for spacex. I wish like hell it was owned by someone else.

[–] dataprolet@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

There's Tesla stocks in my socially responsible ETF. What should I do?

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Divest. Invest in individual stocks you believe in which don't profit off of war, and literal Nazi shit.

[–] brianary@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Micromanaging individual stocks is super risky and basically a full-time job.

[–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 days ago

Yea that's kinda by design unfortunately.

[–] pigup@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

If you're trying to avoid evil companies, maybe stocks aren't the way to uh do that.

A bit day tradey, but short the stock, or sell covered calls? That way you don't profit from the stock, and you can even make some theoretically risk-free money from people investing in Tesla and/or dilute Musk's call options.

[–] evujumenuk@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

If only people would take this stuff to heart. Tesla prices haven't budged 🤷

[–] Angelusz@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Let us just be real here for a second. The solution has already been thought up and planned. Just like a bad marriage, some time apart will make one reconsider life choices.

So let all the nazi's go to space, have their happy mars, 'The Expanse' style.

Then after we'll see how we feel about each other. Breakup or no, no love lost.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

When you are buying from a local farm, you are supporting the trump-voting farmer... 👀

(Its The Good Place problem all over again, somewhere in the supply chain, there's a piece of shit, and you're still technically contributing to evil)

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 6 points 2 days ago

Local farmers don't donate dark money to SuperPACs

[–] ILoveUnions@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you know someone is directly a fascist, don't buy from them if you can get the product elsewhere or it's not needed. It's that simple.

Morals don't get freely handed to you. You have to work for them.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Its easy for me to avoid muskscum, but there are people living in remote areas where starlink is the only usabke internet option, or for people living in (non-us) authoritarian countries, or warzones, and they unfortunately would need to deal with the devil to gain internet access.

I wouldn't blame someone for using starlink if that's the only option. (Like for example, Ukraine had to use Starlink because russia destoryed all the communications infrastructure)

[–] ILoveUnions@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

if you can get the product elsewhere or it's not needed.

There's not yet viable star link alternatives. Yes, if someone points a gun at your head and tells you to buy something somewhat morally bad, buy it lmfao. But you bringing in extremes is quite frankly irrelevant to the average person's buying habits.

[–] Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org 5 points 2 days ago

While you bought a Tesla, I studied the blade.
While you posted on X, I studied the blade.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Seems normal.

[–] Dequei@piefed.social 3 points 2 days ago

Eutalsat please, we want OneWeb for residential use :D

[–] JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Difficult list to look at for a few reasons. Some of these ventures plowed the way forward in their respective field.

Even after the 'innovation plateau' of a few of these ventures, at least the engineers and other experts that actually did the innovating would be able to go work for the competition. At least in theory.

It must be stressful to be in a position doing work you are skilled at - and might even enjoy - while your company's leadership is publicly committed to causes that go against your belief systems.

Though I suppose that's not a problem unique to organisations beneath Musk.

load more comments
view more: next ›