this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2025
496 points (98.8% liked)

Not The Onion

18068 readers
1858 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 85 points 1 week ago

If I had to guess what kind of shot we would make sure schoolchildren got, I would have guessed wrong.

Solid gold, right there.

[–] Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz 39 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I guess this is how they solve their food shortage after getting so much blowback from trying to force children to replace migrants working in the fields.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Yeah, the only logical way I see to evaluate this, assuming these people are not 100% comprised of totally incompetent, koolaid drinking morons...

Is that they are more or less deciding to formally enact and massively ramp up 'economic sacrifice zones'.

Its Bob Page from the intro to Deus Ex:

"Why contain it?"

.........

The insurance companies are already abadoning much of the US Deep Red South.

There is no real solution to that other than massively tax the wealthy and corporations, do massive government directed work and projects and funding schemes... which they obviously will not do, because that is ideologically antithetical to them.

So, instead:

Criminalize poverty, go back to mass slave labor, and just generally encourage and enable everyone to kill themselves and each other in a kind of laissez faire eugenecist free for all... as you squeeze the last drops out of areas that are basically guaranteed to be Mad Max in decade or two.

Shoring things up would require a lot of investment and not the greatest short term ROI, therefore, by C Suite Capitalist logic, uh, just let that branch of the company wither on the vine... maybe the smarter ones will manage to gather enough resources to escape and go be more productive as some other employee elsewhere.

Capitalism is a death cult.

EDIT:

Further evidence of this kind of mindset:

https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2025-04-20/lancaster-mayor-calls-for-homeless-to-get-free-fentanyl

The mayor of Lancaster, Rex Parris, has ignited a controversy after musing during a council meeting that one approach to homelessness would be to “give them free fentanyl … all the fentanyl they want.”

...

He said that he didn’t think anyone had taken his comments literally, but that he did not regret them. In the interview, he said he wished for “a purge” of homeless people.

{"Give them all fentanyl so they will just kill themselves."}

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I really despise how accurate this take seems.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago

So do I, friend, so do I.

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

how they solve their food shortage

Oh hey, they could actually solve an additional problem at the same time! Just send all their extra kids to hunt all their invasive species. Lionfish are tasty and I'll bet bermese python taste like chicken. Sure, not every kid is going to survive the hunt, but now there's more food for everyone! And remember, killing two birds with one stone (so to speak).

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago

Match of the century:

Unwanted children vs hordes of feral boars / superpigs.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 week ago

but it makes sense when you understand that they don’t like the children we currently have. They want us to make other ones instead.

Which will die soon too, but who's counting

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 week ago

Who am I as a government or anyone else, who am I as a man standing here now, to tell you what you should put in your body?

Fair point, that means you're decriminalizing all drugs, right?

[–] MissJinx@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Well that's true natural selection. At least evangelicals will be extinct in a couple of generations lol

collapsed inline media

[–] BlackVenom@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Plot twist: this is the only way to get rid of The Villages

[–] JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

I wonder at what point does a massive series of rocket engines power up and fly the magic kingdom to a market with a viable customer base.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Social security is going bankrupt. Many retirees in FL. If we allow 5-10 year olds to exist, then 60 years from now they are just going to make my share of SS smaller.

main joke explained: Young working people already pay more in SS taxes than they can expect to receive back in retirement. They support older workers in the pyramid scheme, and many who might view the squid game economics have less than 60 years additional life expectancy. Thanks for coming to my podcast.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

A fat lot of good that money will do, when there are no young hands able to wipe the bottoms of the elderly after an accident.

[–] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 week ago

Japanese AI enabled robots! Who needs young people.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Problem could be resolved if, I don't know, tax the rich.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

but, but... I'm rich. Eating children much easier solution. They can't even vote or buy politicians. You're just being political.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 4 points 1 week ago

Squid game moment

[–] Nastybutler@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Just waiting a few years for the news to ask incredulously "Why is Florida's infant mortality rate so much ~~lower~~ higher than the national average?"

[–] GroundedGator@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Florida already seems to have a bit of a problem with child population. Public School enrollment has been declining in my ~~country~~ county and the surrounding ~~countries~~ counties for the last few years.

[–] the_mighty_kracken@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] GroundedGator@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You are welcome. I asked for the sake of clarity, not to be a grammer nazi, which is why I won't point out the other typo.

[–] UncleGrandPa@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

The administration is culling the population....

Prove me wrong

[–] drhodl@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Surely this can't be policy for the kiddy diddler party? Who will they molest and rape, if there's not enough children?

I can't believe that this is policy, unless they figured a way to only not vaccinate the ugly kids.

[–] stinky@redlemmy.com 2 points 1 week ago

well

i mean

[–] Estiar@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

They want to get rid of the kids, but they have to be ripe first. That's why they're banning abortions too. Make Child Mortality great again