Generated Summary:

DNC Fraud Lawsuit Lawyers Discuss Marianne Williamson, RFK Jr., and the Rigged Political System

This video features an interview with Jared and Elizabeth Beck, the attorneys who handled the DNC fraud lawsuit after the 2016 Bernie Sanders campaign. They discuss the lawsuit's origins, the evidence of DNC rigging, and their perspective on the current political landscape, including candidates like Marianne Williamson and RFK Jr.

Key Points:

• Origins of the DNC Fraud Lawsuit: The lawsuit was spurred by evidence of the DNC's rigging of the primary process in favor of Hillary Clinton, which was further substantiated by information provided by Nico House, who had been involved in the Bernie Sanders campaign.
• Purpose of the Lawsuit: The aim was to recover donations for individuals who contributed to the Bernie Sanders campaign, based on the argument that the DNC engaged in monetary fraud.
• DNC's Legal Defense: DNC attorneys argued that the DNC is a private association with no obligation to run a fair primary and that donors have no right to expect their money to be used to support a particular candidate's victory.
• The Role of Media: The media is now a propaganda apparatus for the duopoly party system and has no journalistic interest whatsoever.
• Suspicious Deaths: Sean Lucas, the process server for the lawsuit, and Seth Rich, who was in charge of voter data at the DNC, both died under suspicious circumstances.
• Infiltration: Bernie Sanders' campaign was infiltrated and he had no intention of winning.
• RFK Jr. and Marianne Williamson: The attorneys express skepticism about the candidacies of RFK Jr. and Marianne Williamson, suggesting they may be part of the established political game.
• The Political Process as Entertainment: The attorneys suggest viewing the American elections as entertainment, similar to professional wrestling, rather than believing they genuinely determine the nature of the government.
• Loss of Faith in the System: The attorneys express a loss of faith in the American political system, viewing it as rigged and not genuinely representative of the citizenry's will.
• Advice: Don't donate to political campaigns. Instead, use the money to pay off debt.

Highlighted Information:

• DNC Attorney's Statement: A DNC attorney stated that the DNC is a private association with the right to select a candidate and that donors have no right to expect a fair election.
• The attorneys argue that the political process is "100% fake" and comparable to professional wrestling.
• The deaths of Sean Lucas and Seth Rich, who were connected to the DNC lawsuit and the DNC's voter data, respectively, are presented as suspicious and potentially linked to the case.
• The attorneys suggest that political assassinations are routine in the U.S.
• The attorneys believe that the media is a propaganda apparatus for the duopoly party system.
• The attorneys state that any political candidate that actually holds office for any length of time is rotten to the core.
• The attorneys state that if you have a lot of support and you are actually a threat but you don't play ball, if they can't squash you, they will take you out.

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/9771769

title edit2: replaced symbol with 'and', rephrased summary between () edit3: added quote summary Edit4: updated title []

Short Summary

1. Host introduces guests Jared and Elizabeth Beck, attorneys in the DNC fraud lawsuit, discussing their involvement and the lawsuit's origins.
2. Elizabeth was motivated by the 2007 real estate crash and political interest; both were involved in Bernie Sanders' campaign and noticed election rigging for Hillary Clinton.
3. Nico House provided crucial on-the-ground information about systemic rigging, emphasizing the importance of credible sources in their case.
4. Before the Philadelphia convention, they filed a lawsuit aiming to reimburse Bernie Sanders' campaign donors, viewing the fund allocation to the Democratic party as monetary fraud.
5. The speakers discuss the DNC operating as a private entity with no obligation to follow its charter or be transparent, referencing historical rigging cases and media criticism.
6. They express skepticism towards the political process, discuss assassinations of significant figures, and suggest connections between these deaths and efforts to prove DNC primary rigging.
7. The discussion includes plans to pursue individuals responsible for recording and managing voting data, mentioning deaths under suspicious circumstances and expressing disillusionment with the political system.
8. The speakers criticize reliance on campaign financing from individuals, express disappointment with the political system, and suggest supporting independent or third-party candidates.
9. They discuss the inefficacy of lawsuits in changing election results, criticize the political system's corruption, and advocate for political literacy and self-preservation over participation.
10. The video concludes with a critique of participating in fake elections, the comparison to economic instability, and a recommendation to share the discussed story and read "What Happened to Bernie Sanders" for more details.