jimmydoreisalefty

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
 

SponsorBlock, Timestamps, and Generated Summary below:


SponsorBlock Timestamp:

  1. 0:00.000 - 0:08.200 Intermission
  2. 0:08.200 - 2:08.700 Ukraine President Honors Nazi Brigades, Western Media Whitewashing
  3. 2:08.700 - 2:13.500 Hook/Greetings
  4. 2:13.500 - 2:35.500 Overview of Topics: Zohran Mamdani Election and Nick Fuentes
  5. 2:35.500 - 15:19.000 Analysis of Zohran Mamdani's Election and the DSA Left
  6. 15:19.000 - 15:30.200 Haz Al-Din Joins, Chairman of ACP
  7. 15:30.200 - 1:11:10.000 Interview with Haz Al-Din: Critique of DSA and the Two-Party System
  8. 1:11:10.000 - 1:26:35.000 The Psyop of Nick Fuentes and Controlled Opposition
  9. 1:26:35.000 - 1:27:18.000 Concluding Thoughts and Rejecting the Managerial Class
  10. 1:27:18.000 - 1:28:41.441 Unpaid/Self Promotion

Video Description:

Timestamps:

  1. 0:00 Intro
  2. 2:37 Zohran Mamdani’s Milqtoast Communism | Zohran Upholds the Welfare State
  3. 17:19 The Problem With SocDems
  4. 1:11:02 The Psyop of Nick Fuentes

Tags:

#usnews #uspolitics #ZOHRANMAMDANI #RevolutionaryBlackoutNetwork #ACP #nickcruse #hazaldin #Trump #workingclass #chinanews


Generated Summary:

Compact Overview

This is a summary of a political commentary stream by Nick Cruse, featuring a later interview with Haz Al-Din of the American Communist Party (ACP). The discussion is highly critical of "DSA" or "Democratic Socialist" politicians like Zohran Mamdani, framing them as controlled opposition for the Democratic Party that ultimately serves capitalist and imperialist interests. A parallel critique is leveled at right-wing figure Nick Fuentes, who is presented as a controlled opposition figure for the Republican establishment.

Summary with Timestamps and Segments

0:08 - 2:08 | Intro: Western Media Whitewashes Nazism in Ukraine

  • Nick Cruse opens by arguing that Western media denies the significant presence of neo-Nazis in the Ukrainian military, which he states is a primary driver of the conflict with Russia.
  • He claims the media has reversed its previous acknowledgment of this issue to support a proxy war against Russia, accusing them of "gaslighting" the public despite visible Nazi insignias on Ukrainian soldiers.

2:08 - 15:30 | Analysis of Zohran Mamdani's Election & The "DSA Left"

  • Nick transitions to analyzing the election of Zohran Mamdani as Mayor of New York.
  • He argues Mamdani's victory was a "rhetorical victory against Zionism" but is deeply critical of his politics.
  • A key clip (2:38 - 3:34) is played where Mamdani, during a debate, states his first foreign visit would be to stay in New York City, not Israel. Nick claims this moment won him the election by contrasting him with opponents focused on Israel.
  • Nick criticizes Mamdani as a "welfare capitalist" and "social democrat," not a true socialist. He accuses him of conceding to landlords and legitimizing Zionist talking points.
  • A central clip (17:23 - 18:16) is played where Mamdani defines "democratic socialism" by quoting Martin Luther King Jr. on wealth distribution. Both Nick and Haz Al-Din later condemn this as a misrepresentation of socialism, which they define as a change in ownership and class power, not just redistribution.

15:30 - 1:11:04 | Interview with Haz Al-Din: Critique of the "Managerial Class" & The Two-Party System

  • 15:30: Haz Al-Din joins the stream.
  • 15:34 - 16:35: Brief discussion on Haz's recent trip to China, hosted by the Chinese Communist Party.
  • 16:35 - 29:02: Nick and Haz analyze the Mamdani clip. Haz expresses strong disdain, stating Mamdani's definition of socialism is about "redistribution of wealth" from an imperialist system, not challenging ownership or imperialism itself.
  • They argue that figures like Mamdani, Hassan Piker, and Sam Seder are "political prostitutes" whose real function is to channel left-wing energy back into the Democratic Party and prevent the rise of an independent, anti-imperialist workers' movement.
  • This strategy is labeled as "political nihilism" because it has a history of failure (e.g., not stopping the Gaza conflict, not achieving Medicare for All) and no leverage against the capitalist class.
  • They contend that social democratic reforms in history were only won due to the threat posed by the Soviet Union, and today's "DSA left" has no such power.

29:02 - 45:11 | The Case for a Third Party and Against "Political Nihilism"

  • Nick and Haz challenge the notion that working within the two-party system is the only "realistic" option.
  • They argue that the unaccountable "regime" of the two-party system is a "dictatorship" of the capitalist class.
  • Haz asserts that real change requires building a threat to the entire system from outside, leading to an overhaul.

45:11 - 1:01:48 | Mamdani's Early Actions & The "Anti-Semitism" Hoax

  • Nick plays clips of commentators like Sam Seder and Hassan Piker defending the strategy of working within the Democratic Party, which he and Haz mock as smug and unsuccessful.
  • Nick shows that Mamdani has already distanced himself from some of his online supporters.
  • The segment culminates with Nick showing Mamdani's first tweet as Mayor-elect, which condemned an alleged act of anti-Semitism.
  • Nick frames this as the predictable next step: a "Muslim Zionist" being used to legitimize a crackdown on pro-Palestinian speech under the guise of fighting anti-Semitism. He and Haz suggest such incidents are often hoaxes perpetrated by Zionists themselves.

1:01:48 - 1:11:04 | Concluding Thoughts on the "DSA Left"

  • Both express frustration that the working class continues to fall for what they see as a repeat of the Obama/AOC/Bernie "scam."
  • Haz calls for self-criticism from the anti-establishment left, wondering how to better communicate that this is a "dead end" and break the cycle.

1:11:04 - 1:28:31 | The Psyop of Nick Fuentes

  • Nick shifts to the right, arguing the establishment also uses controlled opposition like Nick Fuentes.
  • He plays a clip of Lindsey Graham bragging about "killing all the right people" and Mark Levin threatening the "anti-Israel" crowd to show the establishment Republican position.
  • Nick argues that Fuentes is then elevated by this establishment (through mentions and media profiles) to capture dissident right-wing energy.
  • A key clip (1:22:25 - 1:23:04) is played where Nick Fuentes endorses regime change in Venezuela, exposing him, in Nick Cruse's view, as a neocon who ultimately serves imperialist interests, not the American working class.
  • They conclude that Fuentes, who was at the January 6 riot and wasn't arrested, is a clear example of controlled opposition, unlike leftist dissidents who face state persecution.

1:26:35 - 1:28:31 | Stream Conclusion

  • The stream ends with a final call to reject the "professional liberal managerial class" and to support anti-imperialist, working-class organizing outside the two-party system.

About:

Nick Cruse:

Citizen journalist Co-Founder #TenDemands Board Member: National RCV [https://www.breaktheduopoly.com/] KC Tenants KC Sunrise [https://allmylinks.com/socialistmma]^[[1] https://substack.com/@socialistmma]

Revolutionary Blackout Network (RBN):

Blacking Out Corporate Propaganda and Educating for a Revolution.

“You can jail a Revolutionary, but you can’t jail the Revolution.” -- Fred Hampton (1948 - 1969)

We should focus our actions, time, and resources on Direct Action, Mutual Aid, and Community Outreach. If you do engage in Electoral Politics do not support the Duopoly (Red or Blue Team). No War but Class War!

 

Video Description:

On this stream: up-to-the-minute election results from the NYC mayor's race as well as key governor's races in VA and NJ - Trump approval rating falls below 40% in latest poll - Kash Patel called out for abusing private jet privileges during govt shutdown - and more.


About Channel:

the post-civilization left

Due Dissidence is a multimedia one-stop shop for left politics and gallows humor in written, audio, and video form.

 

Timestamps:

  1. 1:57:35.000 - [TBD] Election Night

Video Description:

#liveelectionnight #sabbysabs #dickcheney #benshapiro #magaattackstucker #israelassaultconfirmed #sudangenocide #electionnight


About Channel:

Leftist news commentary & interviews. Fighting for political and social change. Sabby Sabs podcast is a part of Revolutionary Blackout Network.

LIVESTREAM SCHEDULE:

  • Tuesdays @7pm ET
  • Thursdays & Fridays @8pm ET
  • Every Other Sunday @5pm ET

Website: https://sabbysabs.com/

 

SponsorBlock, Timestamps, and Generated Summary below:


SponsorBlock Timestamps:

  1. 0:00.000 - 1:35.000 Introduction and Global Recklessness
  2. 1:35.000 - 3:05.000 The Unhinged State and Constitutional Breakdown
  3. 3:05.000 - 5:25.000 The Authoritarian Blueprint and Liberal Complicity
  4. 5:25.000 - 8:57.000 Domestic Police State and Official Racism
  5. 8:57.000 - 11:52.000 Media Manipulation and Institutional Decay
  6. 11:52.000 - 19:28.000 Shifting Alliances and Military Adventurism

Video Description:

The United States has become completely unhinged, says Chris Hedges. There's only one way to stop Trump, by re-empowering the popular movements that were disembowled by him

Follow #MOATS 496 X: @ChrisLynnHedges #Trump #Democrats #Congress


Generated Summary:

Overall Summary: In this interview, Chris Hedges argues that the United States is rapidly descending into an authoritarian state under Donald Trump. He asserts that while liberal institutions like the Democratic Party and the New York Times correctly identify the threat, they are complicit because they refuse to endorse the only viable solution: mass popular mobilization. Hedges contends that these institutions fear a genuine popular movement would displace them along with Trump, preferring to protect their own privilege even as democratic norms collapse. The discussion outlines twelve key indications of this authoritarian shift, weaving them into an analysis of foreign policy recklessness and domestic repression.

Detailed Segment Outline

Segment 1: [00:00 - 01:35] Introduction: Global Recklessness and Impulsive Leadership

  • Key Points: Introduction of Chris Hedges. Discussion of Trump's impulsive and unfocused foreign policy, including potential invasions of Venezuela and Nigeria.
  • Arguments: Trump and his administration are "buffoonish" and lack the understanding or capacity to manage the global consequences of their actions. The so-called ceasefire in Gaza is a "slow-walk," with violence continuing and aid blocked.

Segment 2: [01:35 - 03:05] The Unhinged State and Constitutional Breakdown

  • Key Points: The proposal to resume nuclear weapons testing passes without major outcry, signaling a numbed political climate.
  • Arguments: Hedges states the U.S. has become "completely unhinged," with a subservient Congress and an imperial presidency violating constitutional norms.

Segment 3: [03:05 - 05:25] The Authoritarian Blueprint and Liberal Complicity

  • Key Points: Reference to a New York Times article listing the "12 indications" of authoritarianism [https://web.archive.org/web/20251104022430/https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2025/10/31/opinion/trump-autocracy-democracy-report.html]. The failure of the Democratic Party and its "vapid, celebrity-driven campaign."
  • Arguments: The core argument is presented: the liberal elite recognizes the problem but refuses to support mass mobilization—the only true remedy—because it would end their own power and status, making them "full partners in our emerging police state."
    • Indication 1: An Obsequious and Complicit Legislature.
    • Indication 2: Consolidation of Executive Power (Imperial Presidency).
    • Indication 3: Neutralization of the Political Opposition.
    • Indication 4: Liberal Elite Complicity for Self-Preservation.

Segment 4: [05:25 - 08:57] Domestic Police State and Official Racism

  • Key Points: The militarization of police, the terrorizing of communities (e.g., Chicago raid), and explicitly white supremacist immigration policies.
  • Arguments: The tyranny the U.S. imposed abroad is now being imposed on its own population. The state apparatus is being used to enforce a nakedly racist and xenophobic agenda.
    • Indication 5: Militarization of Domestic Policing.
    • Indication 6: Official Embrace of White Supremacist Policies.
    • Indication 7: Purges of State Institutions.
    • Indication 8: Establishment of Concentration Camps.

Segment 5: [08:57 - 11:52] Media Manipulation, Institutional Decay, and a Third Term

  • Key Points: Discussion of media consolidation by figures like Musk and Murdoch, Trump's lawsuits against the press, gerrymandering, and Trump's desire for a third term.
  • Arguments: The architecture of democracy is being deliberately dismantled. The media is being consolidated to suppress dissent, elections are being structurally manipulated, and the norm of peaceful power transfer is under direct threat.
    • Indication 9: Corporate-State Media Consolidation to Suppress Dissent.
    • Indication 10: Weaponization of the Law Against Critics.
    • Indication 11: Gerrymandering to Permanently Entrench Power.
    • Indication 12: Open Abandonment of Democratic Norms (Third Term).

Segment 6: [11:52 - 19:28] Shifting Alliances and Military Adventurism as Late-Stage Symptoms

  • Key Points: The shift of some right-wing figures (Owens, Carlson) against Israel. The analysis of potential invasions of Venezuela and Nigeria as "disastrous forms of military adventurism."
  • Arguments: These foreign policy debacles are characteristic of a "late empire" accelerating its own decline. Hedges concludes by comparing Trump to a "crazy banana dictator" like Trujillo or Papa Doc Duvalier, underscoring the complete erosion of democratic leadership.

About channel:

Straight talking, straight forward. @WorkersPartyGB Seven time Parliamentarian

Delivering to you the towering and sterling efforts of Britain’s most outstanding political figure.


Edit:

  1. Generated Summary, Segment3, Added NYT Article link: https://web.archive.org/web/20251104022430/https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2025/10/31/opinion/trump-autocracy-democracy-report.html

The generated summary gives an easy-to-understand breakdown of the video, simple and direct.

It should make it easy for people to know if they are interested in the video or if they will ignore it and move on.

You can't please everyone's standards; we do what we can when we can.

All is well.

Peace.

 

SponsorBlock, Timestamps, and Generated Summary below:


SponsorBlock Timestamps:

  1. 0:00.000 - 3:00.000 Intermission
  2. 3:42.500 - 4:04.000 Hook/Greetings
  3. 4:29.500 - 7:50.500 Viewer Comments
  4. 7:50.500 - 8:47.500 Unpaid/Self Promotion
  5. 8:47.500 - 9:55.500 Biopic of Lisa Lisa & Cult Jam
  6. 9:55.500 - 11:10.500 Tangents
  7. 11:10.500 - 14:00.800 Thumbnail Segment Overview
  8. 14:00.800 - 14:15.500 Theme: Who's Driving The Bus?
  9. 14:15.500 - 14:26.000 Interaction Reminder
  10. 14:28.500 - 35:34.500 Trump Nigeria Threat
  11. 35:34.500 - 35:40.000 Theme: Who's Driving The Bus?
  12. 35:40.000 - 1:03:19.500 Cory Booker Confronted, Republican Jewish Coalition Leadership Summit, Rep. Randy Fine, Floyd Mayweather, Mark Levin
  13. 1:03:19.500 - 1:03:36.500 Tangents
  14. 1:03:36.500 - 1:25:16.500 Maduro Arms Up
  15. 1:25:16.500 - 1:25:24.500 Interaction Reminder
  16. 1:25:27.500 - 2:01:34.000 Elites Secret Plan
  17. 2:01:34.000 - 2:01:44.500 Tangents
  18. 2:01:44.500 - 2:06:03.500 Quick Announcement: Documentary 'Removed: Black Erasure In Boston,' Premiere in two weeks on the ground in Boston first then watch party
  19. 2:06:03.500 - 2:17:45.400 Good News Story: New Mexico first state to start Universal Childcare
  20. 2:17:45.400 - 2:17:54.500 Tangents
  21. 2:17:54.500 - 2:50:14.200 Tatum Wakes Up, Nick Fuentes, Tim Pool
  22. 2:50:14.200 - 2:50:57.000 Sabby will be Live on Tuesday, Nov. 4th, 2025, for election night madness: Guest to talk about genocide in Sudan, New Jersey is very close will it turn Red, NYC Mayor Race, and Virginia
  23. 2:50:57.000 - 2:51:38.321 Endcards/Credits

Video Description:

#billackman #sabbysabs #officertatum #trumpnigeria #corybooker #trumpvenezuela #geopoliticsinconflict


Generated Summary:

Overall Summary

The host, Sabrina Salvati ("Sabby"), uses the theme "Who's Driving The Bus?" to analyze current events, arguing that the working class are mere "passengers" while elites, billionaires, and special interests (particularly pro-Israel lobbies) are the "drivers" in control. The episode covers foreign policy, domestic politics, and the threat of AI to the workforce, consistently framing issues through a class and power dynamics lens.


Segment Breakdown & Major Takeaways

1. 0:00.000 - 3:00.000: Intermission

  • Content: Introductory music and host banter.

2. 3:42.500 - 4:04.000: Hook/Greetings

  • Content: Sabby welcomes the audience, acknowledges Daylight Saving Time, and introduces the show's topics.

3. 4:29.500 - 7:50.500: Viewer Comments

  • Content: The host reads and responds to super chats and comments from the live audience.

4. 7:50.500 - 8:47.500: Unpaid/Self Promotion

  • Content: Shout-outs to patrons and new subscribers.

5. 8:47.500 - 9:55.500: Biopic of Lisa Lisa & Cult Jam

  • Content: A brief, light-hearted tangent where Sabby shares her thoughts on a Lisa Lisa biopic.

6. 9:55.500 - 11:10.500: Tangents

  • Content: A short, informal discussion about forgetfulness.

7. 11:10.500 - 14:00.800: Thumbnail Segment Overview

  • Content: Sabby presents the main stories for the night: Elites' AI plan, Corey Booker confrontation, US threats against Nigeria, Venezuela arming civilians, Officer Tatum's wake-up call, and a good news story from New Mexico.

8. 14:00.800 - 14:15.500: Theme: Who's Driving The Bus?

  • Content: The central theme of the episode is explicitly introduced. Sabby urges the audience to ask "Who is in control?" for each story.

9. 14:15.500 - 14:26.000: Interaction Reminder

  • Content: A call to action for viewers to like, subscribe, and share the show.

10. 14:28.500 - 35:34.500: Trump Nigeria Threat

  • Content: Analysis of Donald Trump's statement threatening Nigeria over claims of Christian killings.
  • Arguments & Takeaways:
    • Argument: Trump's focus on "radical Islam" in Nigeria is a deliberate tactic to redirect American fear and anger away from Israel and towards Muslims, mirroring the post-9/11 playbook to regain support for Israel.
    • Takeaway: The threat is not based on a genuine humanitarian concern, as Western media and politicians ignore the killings of Muslims in Nigeria. The real motivations are geopolitical and resource-based (oil, minerals).
    • "Who's Driving the Bus?": The US government, pro-Israel interests, and Western media are driving the bus, controlling the narrative while the Nigerian people are powerless passengers.

11. 35:34.500 - 35:40.000: Theme: Who's Driving The Bus?

  • Content: A brief re-statement of the core theme as a transition.

12. 35:40.000 - 1:03:19.500: Corey Booker Confronted & Republican Jewish Coalition

  • Content: Analysis of a Halloween protest where an activist dressed as Netanyahu confronted Senator Corey Booker, combined with footage from the Republican Jewish Coalition (RJC) leadership summit.
  • Arguments & Takeaways:
    • Argument: The Democratic Party is not a true opposition party to the Republicans on key issues like Israel and billionaire influence. Corey Booker, despite his progressive image, is heavily funded by pro-Israel lobbies (AIPAC) and aligns with them, similar to Republicans.
    • Takeaway: A small, powerful group (like the RJC) has more influence over both parties than the millions of voters. Politicians who defy this group (like Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens) are attacked and deplatformed.
    • "Who's Driving the Bus?": AIPAC, the Israeli lobby, and the donor class are driving the bus. Politicians like Corey Booker are willing passengers who choose not to "get off the bus" or "change lanes" for fear of losing support and funding.

13. 1:03:19.500 - 1:03:36.500: Tangents

  • Content: Brief, informal commentary.

14. 1:03:36.500 - 1:25:16.500: Maduro Arms Up

  • Content: Discussion of Venezuela's President Maduro arming civilian militias in response to reported US plans for military strikes.
  • Arguments & Takeaways:
    • Argument: The US threat against Venezuela is about seizing its vast oil reserves, not fighting drug cartels. The "drug cartel" justification is a pretext, similar to past wars for resources.
    • Takeaway: Maduro's move is a defensive preparation for a potential US invasion. The US action would lead to a devastating war and more refugees.
    • "Who's Driving the Bus?": The US government and its desire for resources are driving the bus towards another conflict, with the Venezuelan people and global stability as collateral damage.

15. 1:25:16.500 - 1:25:24.500: Interaction Reminder

  • Content: Another call to action for viewers to like the video.

16. 1:25:27.500 - 2:01:34.000: Elites Secret Plan (AI Deep Dive)

  • Content: A deep dive into Elon Musk's comments on AI and its connection to billionaire investor Bill Ackman.
  • Arguments & Takeaways:
    • Argument: Elites and billionaires are planning a future where AI eliminates most desk jobs, making work "optional" and forcing a government-funded "universal high income."
    • Takeaway: This will cause massive social trauma, increase dependence on the government, and require universal healthcare. The billionaires driving this (like Musk and Ackman) are the same ones opposing social programs and supporting Israel. AI will also allow them to control information and "rewrite history."
    • Connection to Israel: Bill Ackman is presented as a "double threat"—a powerful Zionist and a major AI investor. The genocide in Gaza and future conflicts are framed as part of a depopulation strategy to reduce the number of people reliant on the future universal income.
    • "Who's Driving the Bus?": The billionaire class is driving the bus, planning a future that benefits them at the expense of the working class, whom they see as expendable.

17. 2:01:34.000 - 2:01:44.500: Tangents

  • Content: Brief, informal commentary.

18. 2:01:44.500 - 2:06:03.500: Quick Announcement: Documentary

  • Content: Promotion for Sabby's upcoming documentary, "Removed: Black Erasure In Boston," about gentrification and displacement.

19. 2:06:03.500 - 2:17:45.400: Good News Story: Universal Childcare in New Mexico

  • Content: Celebration of New Mexico becoming the first state to offer universal, free childcare.
  • Arguments & Takeaways:
    • Argument: This proves that progressive policies can be won at the state level, even when they are blocked federally.
    • Takeaway: The fight for a better life for the working class should focus on state and local ballot measures, which are less influenced by party politics and big money.
    • "Who's Driving the Bus?": In this case, "the people" are driving the bus, demonstrating that change is possible from the ground up.

20. 2:17:45.400 - 2:17:54.500: Tangents

  • Content: Brief, informal commentary.

21. 2:17:54.500 - 2:50:14.200: Tatum Wakes Up (Officer Tatum vs. Nick Fuentes)

  • Content: Analysis of the feud between conservative commentator Officer Tatum and white nationalist Nick Fuentes.
  • Arguments & Takeaways:
    • Argument: Officer Tatum's complaint about Fuentes's racism is hypocritical because Tatum consistently supports Israel, which Sabby labels a "racist, genocidal state."
    • Takeaway: You cannot condemn racism against yourself while supporting what you frame as racism and genocide against others. Tatum is a "passenger" on the right-wing bus for profit and is now facing the consequences of aligning with that movement.
    • "Who's Driving the Bus?": Officer Tatum is not driving his own bus; he is a passenger who has chosen a lucrative but morally compromised seat. He is unwilling to "drive the bus" himself by condemning Israel.

22. 2:50:14.200 - 2:50:57.000: Upcoming Live Show Announcement

  • Content: Preview of the next live show covering election night results and the genocide in Sudan.

23. 2:50:57.000 - 2:51:38.321: Endcards/Credits

  • Content: Closing remarks and music.

About Channel:

Leftist news commentary & interviews. Fighting for political and social change. Sabby Sabs podcast is a part of Revolutionary Blackout Network.

LIVESTREAM SCHEDULE:

  • Tuesdays @7pm ET
  • Thursdays & Fridays @8pm ET
  • Every Other Sunday @5pm ET

Website: https://sabbysabs.com/

 

SponsorBlock, Timestamps, and Generated Summary below:


SponsorBlock Timestamp:

  1. 0:00.000 - 0:08.000 Intermission
  2. 0:08.000 - 2:50.000 Introduction & The Case of Venezuela
  3. 2:49.500 - 2:53.000 Intermission
  4. 2:53.000 - 6:57.000 The Pattern of Sellout Leaders & Historical Revisionism
  5. 2:53.000 - 3:01.000 Hook/Greetings
  6. 6:57.000 - 17:10.000 Japans Prime Minister as a US Puppet
  7. 17:10.000 - 23:15.000 Taiwan and the Sellout Model
  8. 23:15.000 - 1:17:27.000 Interview with Dr. Jill Stein - Organizing and Strategy
  9. 23:15.500 Highlight
  10. 1:17:27.500 - 1:18:52.633 Endcards/Credits

Video Description:

#usnews #uspolitics #JILLSTEIN #RevolutionaryBlackoutNetwork #nickcruse #twopartysystem #greenparty #usimperialism #Trump #workingclass


Generated Summary:

Overall Summary

The speaker, Nick, delivers a monologue critiquing US foreign policy and its allies, framing global conflicts as a struggle between a US-led imperialist "axis of evil" and anti-imperialist forces. He argues that the US ruling class uses false pretexts (like human rights) to justify aggression against nations like Venezuela and China, while supporting genuine human rights violators like Israel and Japan. The core theme is that the real motivation is resource control (oil, critical minerals) and global dominance. The latter part of the transcript is an interview with Dr. Jill Stein, focusing on organizing strategies to counter this imperialism, particularly by stopping the genocide in Gaza through labor action and international pressure.


Key Points & Segment Timestamps

Segment 1: Introduction & The Case of Venezuela (0:08 - 2:50)

  • Timestamp: 0:08 - 2:50
  • Key Points:
    • Open Admission of Imperialism: Neoconservatives are openly discussing plans to violate international law to destabilize and destroy Venezuela.
    • Real Motives: The hostility towards Nicolás Maduro is not due to human rights or drug trafficking, but because Venezuela has the world's largest oil reserves and critical minerals, and Maduro refuses to be a US puppet.
    • Hypocrisy of the Ruling Class: The same people supporting Israel's actions and sanctioning the International Criminal Court (ICC) are portraying Maduro as a "uniquely evil tyrant."
    • Public Opposition: The American people oppose war with Venezuela, which is why media like 60 Minutes runs "pro-war propaganda" to manufacture consent.

Segment 2: The Pattern of "Sellout" Leaders & Historical Revisionism (2:53 - 6:57)

  • Timestamp: 2:53 - 6:57
  • Key Points:
    • Critique of US Leadership: The US ruling class, including Trump, Obama, and Biden, are "gangsters" who engage in war crimes and protect pedophiles.
    • Rejection of Non-Violence: The working class is told to be non-violent while the ruling class's "first go-to" for solving problems is violence.
    • The "New Axis of Evil": Israel's actions in Gaza have shown that international law is meaningless, "opening the floodgates" for other nations to commit atrocities with impunity.
    • Imperial Japan's Resurgence:
      • Argues that Imperial Japan was "easily worse than the Nazis" and its crimes have been whitewashed by the West.
      • China bore the brunt of the fight against Japan for a decade before the US joined.
      • The current Japanese ruling party, a "US puppet for 75 years," refuses to apologize for its war crimes, mirroring rhetoric in the US.

Segment 3: Japan's Prime Minister as a US Puppet (6:57 - 17:10)

  • Timestamp: 6:57 - 17:10
  • Key Points:
    • Embarrassing Display: The new Prime Minister, Sane Takichi, is portrayed as a "happy little puppet" of the US, exemplified by a viral video of her jumping for joy at a US military base.
    • Ignoring Domestic Issues: Instead of addressing Japan's suicide crisis, poor work-life balance, and economic anxiety, her focus is on a "hawkish approach to China" and increasing military spending.
    • A Pattern of "Evil" Female Leaders: The speaker argues that female leaders approved by the West (e.g., Ursula von der Leyen, this Japanese PM) are "bloodthirsty tyrants," not figures to be celebrated by feminists.

Segment 4: Taiwan and the "Sellout" Model (17:10 - 23:35)

  • Timestamp: 17:10 - 23:35
  • Key Points:
    • Taiwan is Part of China: The speaker affirms the "One China" policy, calling Taiwan's president a "glorified governor."
    • Adopting the "Israeli Model": Taiwan is criticized for praising Israel and Netanyahu, suggesting it wants to adopt Israel's model of "defense" (which the speaker equates with using starvation as a weapon).
    • The Pattern Repeats: This aligns Taiwan with other "sellout" leaders (in Japan, Venezuela, Brazil) who sell out their people to US imperialism and Zionism.
    • Contrast with Maduro: Nicolás Maduro is praised for standing in solidarity with Palestinian resistance, while US-backed Venezuelan opposition figure Maria Corina Machado praises Netanyahu.

Segment 5: Interview with Dr. Jill Stein - Organizing and Strategy (23:15 - End)

  • Timestamp: 23:15 - 1:17:23
  • Key Points:
    • We Are Winning Public Opinion: Stein argues that public opinion has turned dramatically against Israel and Zionism since the start of the genocide, and the pro-genocide side is "scared shitless."
    • Reject Powerlessness: The ruling class's main goal is to make people feel powerless and hopeless. She urges people to reject this narrative.
    • The "Uniting for Peace" UN Initiative: This is a primary strategy to bypass the US veto in the Security Council. It would allow the General Assembly (where ~90% of nations support Palestine) to send a protection force at Palestine's request.
    • Action Item: Go to lifelineforpalestine.com to sign petitions and support this initiative.
    • Critique of the "Trump Plan": The so-called peace plan is an "ultimatum for surrender" and an "investment plan" for Trump's family, not a real solution. It has already been violated repeatedly.
    • The Power of Labor:
      • Praises Chris Smalls and the Amazon Labor Union for linking workers' rights with internationalism.
      • Highlights the Italian union U.S.B., which has successfully shut down ports to block weapons to Israel.
      • Five Demands for the AFL-CIO: A petition (bit.ly/DisarmGenocide | [https://secure.everyaction.com/FygyRgBN1EKc_S_Ab1kehg2]) demands that major US labor unions recognize the genocide, condemn the attack on Chris Smalls, and use their power to refuse shipping weapons to Israel.
    • Critique of the Democratic Party & "No Kings" Rally: Stein and the host dismiss figures like AOC and the "No Kings" rally as "Democratic Party astroturf" that silences true anti-imperialist voices and is beholden to Zionist and oligarchic funders.

About Channel, Revolutionary Blackout:

Blacking Out Corporate Propaganda and Educating for a Revolution.

“You can jail a Revolutionary, but you can’t jail the Revolution.” -- Fred Hampton (1948 - 1969)

We should focus our actions, time, and resources on Direct Action, Mutual Aid, and Community Outreach. If you do engage in Electoral Politics do not support the Duopoly (Red or Blue Team). No War but Class War!


Edit:

  1. Fixed and updated SponsorBlock timestamps and Generated Summary timestamps
  2. Fixed and updated SponsorBlock timestamp and Generated Summary timestamp
 

SponsorBlock, Timestamps, and Generated Summary below:


SponsorBlock Timestamp:

  1. 0:00.0 - 0:02.8 - Intermission
  2. 0:02 - 3:28 - Breadlines & Unpaid Federal Employees
  3. 3:28 - 5:30 - Food Bank Data & SNAP Scale
  4. 5:30 - 7:52 - Political Critique: Both Parties, Billionaires
  5. 7:52 - 10:29 - Food Bank Capacity Limitations
  6. 10:29 - 12:45 - Call for Community Mutual Aid
  7. 12:45 - 14:34 - SNAP User Testimony: Working Single Mother
  8. 14:34 - 18:51 - Massachusetts SNAP Lapse & Funding Critique
  9. 18:51 - 21:26 - Warning Against Large Charities
  10. 21:26 - 23:30 - Canceled Government Food Aid (94M lbs)
  11. 23:30 - 24:05 - Broader Economic Struggle
  12. 24:05 - 25:02 - Major Company Layoffs List
  13. 25:02 - 29:47 - AI & Automation Job Replacement
  14. 29:47 - 31:12 - Detroit Urban Farmer Mutual Aid Example
  15. 31:12 - 33:24 - Final Summary & Direct Call to Action
  16. 33:24.900 - 33:34.919 - Endcards/Credits

Video Description:

#breadlines #sabbysabs #governmentshutdown


Generated Summary:

The Looming SNAP Crisis & Systemic Failure**

This transcript outlines a multi-faceted crisis of food insecurity in the United States, driven by a government shutdown but rooted in long-standing systemic issues. The speaker uses data, expert interviews, and visual evidence to argue that the government has failed its people and that community-based mutual aid is the necessary response.


1. The Immediate Crisis: Government Shutdown & SNAP Lapse (Timestamps: 0:00 - 3:28, 14:34 - 18:51)

  • Main Point: A government shutdown is causing a direct and immediate threat to food security for millions.
  • Key Data & Details:
    • SNAP benefits for 42 million Americans are set to run out on November 1st.
    • Visual Evidence: Breadlines are shown in Landover, Maryland, populated by federal employees who are not receiving paychecks.
    • State Example: In Massachusetts, over a million "Bay Staters" are told SNAP benefits will not be issued. The state receives $240 million per month from the federal government for SNAP, which it cannot backfill.
  • Source: The USDA and state government announcements (via news reports).

2. The Pre-Existing & Worsening Problem (Timestamps: 3:28 - 5:30)

  • Main Point: Food insecurity was already at a crisis level before the shutdown.
  • Key Data & Details:
    • 70% Increase: The Atlanta Community Food Bank saw a 70% surge in demand over 3.5 years due to inflation.
    • DMV Area: A 2025 hunger report found 1.5 million households (36%) in the DC-Maryland-Virginia area were food insecure prior to the shutdown.
  • Source: Interview with Kyle Wade, President & CEO of the Atlanta Community Food Bank (on CNN).

3. Systemic Failure & Political Critique (Timestamps: 5:30 - 7:52, 21:26 - 23:30)

  • Main Point: Both Democratic and Republican parties are accused of prioritizing corporations and the wealthy over working-class citizens.
  • Key Data & Details:
    • Canceled Aid: A ProPublica investigation revealed the Trump administration canceled 94 million pounds of food (meat, dairy, produce) destined for food banks in 2024.
    • Misplaced Priorities: Contrasts the SNAP crisis with examples like Massachusetts sending $10 million in aid to Israel and the 2008 Wall Street bailout.
    • Available Funds: It is stated that a contingency fund exists, and the President has the power to use it to continue SNAP benefits but has chosen not to.

4. Compounding Economic Pressures (Timestamps: 24:05 - 29:47)

  • Main Point: Mass layoffs and automation are creating a perfect storm for economic despair.
  • Key Data & Details:
    • Major Layoffs: A list is provided, including UPS (48,000), Amazon (30,000), Intel (24,000), and Ford (11,000).
    • AI & Automation: The speaker links job losses to a corporate push for AI and automation, demonstrating new self-checkout shopping carts that eliminate cashier jobs.

5. The Advocated Solution: Community Mutual Aid (Timestamps: 12:45 - 13:40, 30:24 - End)

  • Main Point: The only reliable solution is for communities to organize and support each other.
  • Key Details:
    • Humanizing Testimony: A clip from "Lacy," a single, working mother of a medically complex child, defends SNAP recipients against stereotypes of laziness (Timestamp: 12:45).
    • Positive Example: Travis Peters, a Detroit urban farmer, is highlighted for offering free bags of produce to anyone affected by the SNAP lapse, embodying the mutual aid model.
    • Call to Action: The speaker repeatedly urges viewers to start local mutual aid groups, distrust large NGOs like United Way, and take direct action to help their neighbors.

In conclusion, the speaker frames the SNAP crisis not as an isolated event but as a symptom of a system that abandons its people, arguing that the only path forward is through community solidarity and self-reliance.


About Channel:

Leftist news commentary & interviews. Fighting for political and social change. Sabby Sabs podcast is a part of Revolutionary Blackout Network.

LIVESTREAM SCHEDULE:

  • Tuesdays @7pm ET
  • Thursdays & Fridays @8pm ET
  • Every Other Sunday @5pm ET

Website: https://sabbysabs.com/

Generated Summary:


Total Words: ~39,000 Total Pages: 101 (iii-xii, 1-101)

Summary: Stabilizing the U.S.-China Rivalry

This RAND Corporation report, authored by Michael J. Mazarr, Amanda Kerrigan, and Benjamin Lenain, analyzes the potential for stabilizing the intense geopolitical rivalry between the United States and China. It argues that while the competition is real and driven by conflicting interests, both sides have a critical interest in avoiding conflict and establishing a stable "modus vivendi." The report provides a framework for stabilization and offers specific recommendations for the overall relationship and three key flashpoints: Taiwan, the South China Sea, and the science and technology competition.

Main Points and Analysis

1. The Need and Possibility for Stabilization

  • The Rivalry is Dangerous but Can Be Managed: The U.S.-China rivalry poses significant risks of military conflict, economic warfare, and global instability, threatening consensus on issues like climate change and AI (p. 1-2, 4). The authors reject the argument that seeking stability is a sign of weakness or "appeasement," drawing a parallel to Cold War détente, which they argue ultimately hastened the Soviet Union's internal crisis rather than strengthening it (p. 2, 14-15).
  • A Limited, Not Transformative, Goal: The report's goal is not to end the rivalry or achieve a grand transformation of the relationship. Instead, it seeks a more limited "stable competition" or "modus vivendi"—a condition of continued rivalry managed by mechanisms that prevent crises, avoid war, and protect each side's most vital interests (p. 3, 18-19).

2. A Framework for a Stable Rivalry (Chapter 2) The report identifies six principles that define a stable strategic rivalry (p. 22-23): 1. Mutual acceptance that a modus vivendi is necessary. 2. Acceptance of the other's essential political legitimacy. 3. Development of shared rules and norms in specific issue areas. 4. Restraint in developing capabilities that undermine the other's existential deterrent. 5. Acceptance of a shared vision of basic organizing principles for world politics. 6. Establishment of mechanisms (e.g., communication links, crisis management) to maintain equilibrium.

Based on these principles, the authors propose six broad-based initiatives for general stabilization (p. 25-27): 1. Clarify U.S. objectives to reject absolute victory and accept the Chinese Communist Party's legitimacy. 2. Reestablish trusted lines of communication between senior officials. 3. Improve crisis-management practices and agreements. 4. Seek new agreements to limit cyber competition. 5. Declare mutual acceptance of strategic nuclear deterrence. 6. Seek modest cooperative ventures on shared interests (e.g., climate, pandemics).

3. Assessing Chinese Intentions: Is Coexistence Possible? (Chapter 3)

  • The chapter critiques recent analyses (by Doshi, Rolland, Rudd, Pottinger) that portray China as having immutable, aggressive goals that preclude coexistence.
  • Through re-examination and re-translation of Chinese-language sources, the report argues that Chinese strategic concepts are often more ambiguous and less aggressively expansionist than portrayed (p. 31-43). For example:
    • Taoguang yanghui (韬光养晦) is better understood as "keeping a low profile" for domestic development rather than a sinister "hide and bide" strategy (p. 31-32).
    • The concept of "strategic space" is often framed defensively, as a response to perceived U.S. containment, and is coupled with calls for a stable external environment (p. 44-46).
  • Conclusion: While China is assertive and a strategic competitor, its official rhetoric (e.g., Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence, Community of Common Destiny) and the nuance in its documents suggest there is potential flexibility and an "opening for coexistence," contradicting the most alarmist interpretations (p. 46-53).

4. Stabilizing Specific Flashpoints (Chapter 4) For each of the three critical issues, the report proposes recommendations in three categories: (A) Broad Political/Signaling, (B) Near-Term Steps, and (C) Bolder Initiatives for the future.

A. Taiwan (p. 74-77)

  • Theory of Success: Create maximum incentive for Beijing to pursue gradual approaches by combining robust deterrence with political reassurances to make a patient strategy comfortable.
  • Recommendations:
    • A1. Mutual Reassurances: Exchange statements; the U.S. reaffirming it does not support Taiwan independence, and China reaffirming a preference for peaceful reunification (p. 75).
    • A2. High-Level Dialogue: Establish a regular senior-level dialogue to communicate concerns and avoid surprises (e.g., on military moves, arms sales) (p. 75).
    • A3. Reinforce Deterrence: China should clarify its redlines; the U.S. should work with partners to signal that aggression would make China an international pariah (p. 75).
    • B1. Empowered Track 2 Dialogues: Create unofficial dialogues with strong connections to high-level officials to discuss strategic and operational issues and serve as crisis backchannels (p. 76).
    • B2. Strengthen Military Communications: Maintain and improve existing military-to-military and crisis communications links, which are often cut off during tensions (p. 77).
    • C1. U.S. Leverage with Taiwan: The U.S. should use its influence to ensure Taiwan's actions do not escalate tensions, as part of burden-sharing (p. 77).

B. South China Sea (p. 80-82)

  • Theory of Success: Combine deterrence of military escalation with intensified multilateral diplomacy to establish a peaceful resolution as the default process.
  • Recommendations:
    • A1. Clarify Treaty Obligations: The U.S. and Philippines should jointly clarify the actions that would invoke the Mutual Defense Treaty (p. 80).
    • A2. Chinese Red Lines: China should clarify its specific redlines regarding other claimants' actions (p. 80).
    • A3. Coordinated Statements: Issue mutual statements recognizing China's security interests and U.S. commitments to maritime freedom (p. 81).
    • B1. Mutual Restraint: Agree to forswear specific actions around flashpoints like the Second Thomas Shoal (p. 81).
    • B2. Bilateral Code of Conduct: Build on the July 2024 provisional agreement to develop a bilateral code for incident management (p. 81).
    • B3. Reduce Publicity of Operations: The U.S. could selectively reduce the publicity of FONOPs and ISR flights to test for reciprocal Chinese restraint (p. 81).
    • C1. Doctrinal Shifts: Both sides could shift military doctrine from "offense and control" to "defense and access" (p. 81-82).
    • C2. Negotiate U.S. Operations: The U.S. could privately signal a willingness to negotiate some ISR/FONOP activity conditional on China moderating its claims (p. 82).

C. Science and Technology Competition (p. 83-85)

  • Theory of Success: Manage the worst risks of emerging technologies while stepping back from extreme efforts to undermine the other's progress.
  • Recommendations:
    • A1. Political Reassurances: Offer statements that the U.S. does not seek to retard China's general development and welcomes cooperation in non-threatening areas (p. 83).
    • A2. Track 1.5 Dialogues: Initiate government-nongovernment dialogues on emerging tech (especially AI and biotech) to build mutual understanding (p. 84).
    • B1. Deterrent Commitments: Clarify that attacks on critical S&T infrastructure (e.g., labs, data centers) will be met with proportional responses (p. 84).
    • B2. Reciprocal Restraint: Formalize agreements to limit gain-of-function research, AI-enabled cyberattacks in peacetime, and AI in nuclear command and control (p. 84).
    • B3. Deepen AI Dialogue: Build on existing intergovernmental AI dialogues to address risks more seriously (p. 84).
    • B4. Expand Basic Science Collaboration: Identify limited, non-sensitive areas for joint basic research under the U.S.-China Science and Technology Cooperation Agreement (p. 84-85).
    • C1. AI Loss-of-Control Cooperation: Undertake deeper cooperation with other nations to assess and mitigate potential AI misalignment dangers (p. 85).
    • C2. Return to Deep Collaboration: In a future thaw, identify areas for a significant return to deep collaboration between U.S. and Chinese universities and researchers (p. 85).

Overall Conclusion

The report concludes that while the proposed agenda is ambitious and faces significant political barriers, stabilizing the U.S.-China rivalry is an urgent and necessary goal. The path forward involves a combination of improved dialogue, targeted deterrent commitments, tangible mutual restraint, and formalized mechanisms to manage competition and avoid conflict. The authors stress that seeking stability is not an alternative to firmness but a complementary strategy to make intense competition sustainable and less risky (p. 85-86).

 

Fred Hampton Speech: "Why don't you die for the people" [02:27 | AUG 28 2010 | jerbo414 | https://youtu.be/_7F8RfnDhkA]

Transcript:

  1. If you ever think about me,
  2. and if you think about me [removed]s,
  3. and if you ain't gonna do
  4. no revolutionary act
  5. forget about me.
  6. I don't want myself on your mind
  7. If your not going to work for the people.
  8. Like we always said,
  9. If you're asked to make a commitment
  10. at the age of twenty,
  11. and you say,
  12. "I don't want to make a commitment",
  13. Only Because of the simple reason that,
  14. "I'm too young to die",
  15. "I want to live a little bit longer"...
  16. What you did is,... you're dead already.
  17. You have to understand,
  18. That people have to pay
  19. the price for peace.
  20. If you dare to struggle,
  21. you dare to win.
  22. If you dare not struggle, then
  23. god damn-it, you don't deserve to win.
  24. Let me say peace to you.
  25. If you're willing to fight for it.
  26. Let me say in the spirit of liberation...
  27. I've been gone for a little while.
  28. At least my body's been gone
  29. for a little while.
  30. But I'm back now.
  31. And I believe that I'm back to stay.
  32. I believe that I'm going to do my job.
  33. And I believe that I was born,
  34. not to die in a car wreck;
  35. I don't believe that I'm going to die
  36. in a car wreck.
  37. I don't believe I'm going to die
  38. slipping on a piece of ice;
  39. I don't believe I'm going to die
  40. because I got a bad heart;
  41. I don't believe I'm going to die
  42. because of lung cancer.
  43. I believe that I'm going to be able to
  44. die doing the things I was born for.
  45. I believe that I'm going to be able
  46. to die high off the people.
  47. I believe that I will be able to die
  48. as a revolutionary in the
  49. international revolutionary
  50. proletarian struggle
  51. and I hope that each one of you will
  52. be able to die in the international
  53. proletarian revolutionary struggle
  54. or you'll be able to live in it.
  55. And I think that struggle's
  56. going to come.
  57. Why don't you live for the people.
  58. Why don't you struggle for the people.
  59. Why don't you die for the people.
 

SponsorBlock, Timestamps, and Generated Summary below:


SponsorBlock Timestamps:

  1. 0:00.000 - 1:00.000 Preview/Recap
  2. 1:00.000 - 12:20.000 Introduction & Show Opening
  3. 12:20.000 - 31:30.000 Debating California's Affordability & Housing Crisis
  4. 35:06.000 - 44:00.000 The "Grow the Pie" Fallacy & Wealth Inequality
  5. 47:22.000 - 56:30.000 Healthcare, "Constraints," and Democratic Party Inaction
  6. 59:51.000 - 1:08:00.000 The Zohran Mamdani Case Study & Co-optation
  7. 1:18:00.000 - 1:33:00.000 The Future of the Left & Rising Class Consciousness
  8. 1:34:23.000 - 1:48:00.000 Newsom's AIPAC Meltdown & The Israel-Palestine Litmus Test
  9. 1:55:00.000 - 2:01:50.000 Final Thoughts & Calls to Action
  10. 2:01:54.300 - 2:02:07.200 Unpaid/Self Promotion
  11. 2:02:07.200 - 2:02:44.221 Endcards/Credits

Video Description:

Marxist economist Richard Wolff returns to Bad Faith along with historian, professor, and Green Party candidate for the governor of California Butch Ware, to forensically break down California governor Gavin Newsom's recent viral appearance on Higher Learning with Van Lathan & Rachel Lindsay. Wolff & Ware weigh in on Newsom evasions in response to questions about the inherent contradictions of capitalism, California's failure to implement Medicare for All, & the "interesting" AIPAC moment, but the Higher Learning interview serves as a jumping off point for a broader and deeper conversation about the future of left politics, Zohran Mamdani, and the limits of the Democratic Party. (It's spooky season, and there's something magical happening with this guest pairing.)


Generated Summary:

"The Most Effective Counter-Insurgency": How the Democratic Party Co-opts the Left (A Case Study of Gavin Newsom)

This episode features a deep dive into California Governor Gavin Newsom's recent interview on the "Higher Learning" podcast. Marxist economist Richard Wolff and Green Party gubernatorial candidate Butch Ware provide a critical analysis of Newsom's positions on housing, the economy, healthcare, and Israel/Palestine, using his interview as a springboard for a broader discussion about the limits of the Democratic Party and the future of left politics.


Major Segments & Timestamps

1. Segment: The California "Affordability Crisis" & The Failures of Capitalism

  • Starts: ~12:20 | Ends: ~31:30
  • Main Points:
    • Newsom's Argument: Newsom defends his record by pointing to job growth and a "vibrant" California economy, blaming the housing crisis on a "supply/demand imbalance" and local "NIMBY" (Not In My Backyard) opposition. He frames the solution as "Econ 101": building more housing and creating favorable conditions for private developers.
    • Richard Wolff's Rebuttal: Wolff dismantles this, stating that relying on the "profit motive" is the core of the problem. He explains that private developers will only build luxury housing, not affordable housing. He argues for massive public investment and non-profit, cooperative housing models, pointing out that treating housing as a human right, not a commodity, is the real solution.
    • Butch Ware's Rebuttal: Ware calls Newsom's narrative "neoliberal garbage," highlighting California's extreme wealth inequality, high poverty rates, and vast homelessness. He points out that there are already enough vacant units; the problem is corporate landlords like Blackstone hoarding them. His solution is to tax these entities heavily and create a massive public housing sector, like the model in Vienna.

2. Segment: Wealth Inequality & The "Growth vs. Distribution" Shell Game

  • Starts: ~35:06 | Ends: ~44:00
  • Main Points:
    • Newsom's Argument: When asked about capitalism's role in wealth inequality, Newsom acknowledges the problem but pivots to a "grow the pie" argument. He praises "entrepreneurialism" and says he doesn't "begrudge other people's success," framing the solution as "growth" with "inclusion."
    • Richard Wolff's Rebuttal: Wolff labels the "grow the pie" argument a centuries-old trick used by the rich to avoid addressing the real issue: how the pie is divided. He states that growth alone has never solved inequality and that Newsom's "inclusion" rhetoric is a empty pivot to avoid talking about redistributing wealth and power.
    • Butch Ware's Rebuttal: Ware connects this to Reagan-era "trickle-down economics," which he notes was originally called "horse and sparrow theory" (the idea that if you feed the horse enough oats, some will pass through for the sparrows). He argues Democrats are now to the right of Reagan on economics.

3. Segment: Healthcare & The "Constraints" of Power

  • Starts: ~47:22 | Ends: ~56:30
  • Main Points:
    • Newsom's Argument: Confronted on why Democrats don't support popular policies like Medicare for All, Newsom claims he believes single-payer is "inevitable" but blames "constraints," "pragmatism," and the need for "compromise." He points to expanding healthcare access under Obamacare as a pragmatic achievement.
    • Butch Ware's Rebuttal: Ware states the simple reason: the Democratic Party is a "wholly-owned subsidiary" of corporate donors, including the healthcare industry. He notes that Newsom ran on single-payer and then abandoned it once in office after industry pressure.
    • Richard Wolff's Rebuttal: Wolff eviscerates the "constraints" argument, stating that a real leader would mobilize public pressure to overcome those constraints. He uses the example of President Obama asking for a mass movement and then crushing the Occupy Wall Street movement when it emerged, proving the "constraints" excuse is a hollow justification for inaction.

4. Segment: The AIPAC Meltdown & The Democratic Party's Israel Problem

  • Starts: ~1:34:23 | Ends: ~1:48:00
  • Main Points:
    • The Newsom Clip: The panel reviews the viral moment where Newsom is asked about taking money from AIPAC. He has a visibly flustered meltdown, repeatedly calling it "interesting" and claiming, "I haven't thought about Apac in years."
    • Panel's Analysis:
      • Briahna & Butch: They see this as a revealing moment of panic. Ware suggests Newsom was caught off-guard by credible journalism from a Black podcast, expecting a softer interview. Both see it as proof of the illicit, unspoken relationship between establishment Democrats and pro-Israel lobbies.
      • Richard Wolff: Wolff expresses shock that a major politician would so blatantly lie in public and be unconcerned about the backlash, seeing it as a sign of impunity.

5. Segment: Zohran Mamdani, Co-optation, and the Future of the Left

  • Starts: ~1:18:00 | Ends: ~1:33:00
  • Main Points:
    • A Case Study in Co-optation: The discussion uses NY politician Zohran Mamdani as a case study for the pressures faced by leftists inside the Democratic Party. Briahna expresses concern that Mamdani is already moderating his stances on issues like policing and Palestine after winning his primary.
    • Butch Ware's Thesis: Ware powerfully argues that the Democratic Party is "the most effective counterinsurgency organization ever to emerge in modern history," designed to identify, co-opt, and neutralize any truly transformative movement. He quotes Malcolm X that the "white liberal is the most dangerous thing" because they are a "concealed enemy."
    • Richard Wolff's Optimism: Wolff is more optimistic, arguing that the mass support for figures like Mamdani and Bernie Sanders signals a rising "class consciousness" and a turning of the public against capitalism, even if they don't use the word. He believes this shift in mass awareness is a cause for hope.

6. Segment: Final Thoughts & Calls to Action

  • Starts: ~1:55:00 | Ends: ~2:01:50
  • Main Points:
    • Richard Wolff: Warns about the dangers of AI-generated fake videos and highlights the US's extrajudicial killings off the coast of Venezuela as a terrifying example of resurgent colonialism that is being ignored.
    • Butch Ware: Makes his pitch for his California gubernatorial campaign, emphasizing its grassroots, no-corporate-money model and its commitment to mutual aid and direct action. He positions himself as the only anti-Zionist candidate in the race.

Overall Key Takeaways

  • The Democratic Party's Core Problem: Both guests argue the party is fundamentally a capitalist party that serves corporate donors, making it incapable of delivering systemic change on housing, healthcare, or foreign policy (e.g., Israel/Palestine).
  • The "Fox vs. Wolf": Butch Ware's use of Malcolm X's analogy frames establishment Democrats (the "fox") as more dangerous than open conservatives (the "wolf") because they pretend to be allies while actively working against working-class interests.
  • A Shift in Consciousness: Despite the criticism, there is optimism that public consciousness is shifting, with growing anger over inequality and genocide creating new opportunities for left politics outside the two-party system.

About Channel:

based on the hit tv show

With Briahna Joy Gray

 

From Crisis to Care

We need a California where Health & Housing are not stock options, but Simple COMMON SENSE SOLUTIONS.


Our Core Principles

  • We bring the people's agenda to the Governor's desk. The California Democratic Party’s super-majority trifecta has blocked life-saving legislation on healthcare, housing, the economy, education, climate, and more.

    • WE END THE ROADBLOCKS.
  • We Californians should own our government, not the billionaires. Decades of crooked politics have turned our state into a money and land grab for multinational corporations and their bought politicians.

    • WE STOP THEIR GRIFT.
  • We reject the divisive use of identities and ideologies that have been weaponized to isolate us from each other by the current system's institutions.

    • WE FIGHT IN SOLIDARITY AND COMMUNITY.
  • We build movements to empower communities with electoral power, putting the Green Party in the hands of working people to use in our fight FOR the working class.

    • WE WIN TOGETHER.

Platform: Housing & Homelessness

The Problem:

  • Homelessness has risen by 50% in 5 years while most spending has gone to real estate developers & NGOs.
  • We cannot solve homelessness with sweeps, vagrancy laws, and the criminalization of poverty.
  • A $100 increase in median rent is estimated to raise homelessness by 9%.

Our Solutions: We will extend housing and care, building a system of universal security. This can dramatically reduce homelessness at a far lower cost than the $25 billion spent by Newsom’s Administration.

  • Reclaiming Public Goods: Use eminent domain for egregious, corrupt private appropriation of public goods.
  • Progressive Taxation of Vacant Properties: Target corporate and private equity companies that own large numbers of empty properties.
  • Homes Not Profits: Acquired properties become state-managed, mixed-income, social housing operated at cost, not for profit.
  • Fair Rents Now: Immediate rent freeze, aggressive rent control, and enforcement.
  • Path to Home Ownership: Mortgage forgiveness and state first-time homeowner programs to bring homeownership back within reach.

Platform: Healthcare for All

Healthcare should be accessible to all residents of California without regard to income or zip code. With the world's third-highest GDP, California has the resources.

We will cut out the parasitic middleman of private health insurance and redirect those funds from shareholder profits and CEO salaries to actual healthcare.

The Butch Ware campaign unequivocally supports a state-based single-payer healthcare system through the CalCare program.

CalCare Principles:

  • Universal Coverage
  • A Single Public Program
  • Fully Comprehensive Benefits
  • Freedom to Choose Your Care Provider
  • Free at the Point of Service
  • Just Transition for industry workers
  • Patient Care Based on Patient Need

How We Do It: We will declare a healthcare emergency and implement CalCare by executive order. It will be paid for by:

  • Taxing the wealthy and large corporations' profits.
  • Reaping the benefits of preventive care.
  • No insurance premiums, copays, deductibles, or coinsurance.

We will also encourage more healthcare professionals by making state college tuition-free and reinvest funds to build more hospitals and clinics in underserved areas.


Platform: Divestment from Genocide & War Crimes

It will be a top priority to ensure California is divested from all genocides and other war crimes globally.

We will create an executive task force to investigate state-based financial and political ties to foreign regimes and corporations engaged in or aiding genocide, ethnic cleansing, and war crimes.

A Butch Ware Administration will:

  • Veto any spending legislation that is not divested.
  • Direct the State Treasurer and other agencies to divest.
  • Appoint board members who prioritize divestment.
  • By executive order, adjust or freeze any non-divested spending.
  • Reinvest those funds to support the immediate needs of Californians.

We will also direct that existing anti-BDS laws not be enforced and encourage the legislature to repeal them.


Every dollar helps move California from crisis to care.

Invest in a future where housing, healthcare & education are rights.

 

Why I’m running for U.S. Congress

And building the strongest antiwar, anti-genocide election campaign in the nation
by Kshama Sawant

Most of the time, working people have no political representation under capitalism. Both the Democrats and Republicans serve the interests of the billionaires, and both are warmongering parties down to their bones.

My decade as a socialist on the Seattle City Council was fundamentally different. My fellow socialists and I completely flipped the script on how to use elected office. We rejected any idea that my job was to help administer the capitalist state through behind-the-scenes negotiations with Democrats and the Chamber of Commerce.

Instead, my socialist city council office went to war for working people to defeat the strenuous opposition from both big business and the Democratic Party. And again and again, we won.

Winning Historic Victories as a Socialist Councilmember

When I first ran for the Seattle City Council in 2013, I campaigned on a $15 an hour minimum wage (dismissed as “utopian” at the time), on taxing the rich, and on rent control. Unlike the “Squad” and other “progressives,” I kept my promises.

Less than six months after my first election, we won the nation’s first major-city $15 an hour minimum wage, a wage that is now the highest in the country at $20.76 an hour because we also won inflation increases. It was after our victory here that the “Fight for 15” spread around the country.

As Mother Jones noted, “Who thought one lonely Trotskyist could so upend, in so little time, the American consensus on a fair wage? ‘Nobody reckoned with Kshama Sawant,’ the New York Times wrote in 2013.”

In 2020 we won the Amazon Tax, which raises hundreds of millions of dollars annually from the city’s wealthiest businesses to fund affordable housing. So yes, it is possible to defeat Amazon, even on their home turf.

We won a slew of renters’ rights victories, including limits on previously exorbitant move-in fees, a $10 cap on late rent fees, a requirement of six months’ notice for rent increases, economic evictions assistance forcing landlords to pay three months’ rent to tenants forced to leave due to rent increases of 10 percent or more, a ban on evictions in winter months, and a ban on school-year evictions of children and public school workers.

These victories sent corporate landlords into an uproar. One of the city’s real estate lobbyists, brother of recent mayor Jenny Durkan, complained that “every dollar” spent on lobbying the Seattle City Council was being wasted because of “Sawant’s army.” Sometimes your enemies give the best compliments.

We won because we didn’t put faith in the utterly failed strategy of trying to reform the Democratic (or Republican) Party or winning over these politicians through moral persuasion. The problem is that, with rare exceptions, they have no morals. Even if a given politician started out with good intentions, the leadership of their party ensures they don’t last long — either the morals go or the politician does.

After I left the City Council undefeated in four elections to launch Workers Strike Back, Seattle’s Democrats have dedicated themselves to trying to undermine or overturn our working-class victories in Seattle.

Workers Strike Back has been able to defeat both their efforts so far — last year when they attacked our historic minimum wage victory, and just last week, when we forced them to back off on their attempt to attack renters’ rights by first undermining the city’s ethics laws.

Our fighting strategy is urgently needed nationally, including in the U.S. Congress. Progressive Democrats like AOC and Bernie Sanders have long since capitulated to the corporate and warmongering agenda of their party. Working people need elected representatives willing to use their positions to help build mass movements in order to end the genocide and all U.S. military funding to the Israeli state, defeat the attacks on public funds for our basic needs, and win offensive demands like Medicare for All and a $25 an hour federal minimum wage.

This is why I launched Workers Strike Back. That is also why I am running for Congress against Democrat Adam Smith. Just as I used my City Council election campaigns to build momentum for the $15 minimum wage and the Amazon Tax, I will use my Congressional election campaign to help build the antiwar movement and to launch a historic fight for Medicare for All.

And just as I did in my decade as a representative of working people in Seattle, if I’m elected to Congress, I will accept only the average worker’s wage and donate the rest of my six-figure salary to workers’ and social justice movements.

Democrats, Republicans, and the Genocide

Contrary to the shocking and systematic under-reporting in mainstream media, estimates from The Lancet indicate the Gaza death toll was likely over 335,000 by September last year, and has likely since surpassed 400,000. At least a hundred Gazan children are being injured or killed daily since Israel resumed its genocidal offensive in March. Gaza has been reduced to rubble.

Neither the Democratic nor the Republican Party has a shred of moral credibility after having backed the Israeli state to the hilt. Both are fully responsible for what is in reality a new holocaust, because it would not have been possible without the billions of dollars they approved in funding from the U.S. state.

But we should not be surprised. Both Democrats and Republicans have been purveyors of endless brutal wars throughout their history.

According to a Brown University study, the Democrats and Republicans in the U.S. Congress spent more than $14 trillion on war since 9/11. A third to one half of this money is pocketed by military contractors, who in turn fund the campaigns of their favorite Democrats and Republicans.

Adam Smith Has Blood On His Hands

One such weapons industry treasure is my opponent in Washington’s 9th Congressional District, Democrat Adam Smith, who has held this office since 1997 and who has blood all over his hands.

Smith has never met a war that he didn’t like. He has fully backed the genocide in Gaza. He has demonized anti-genocide activists as “extremists” and “left-wing fascists,” called for them to be arrested, and likening their actions to the far-right attack on the U.S. Capitol. He holds the shameful distinction of being one of only five sitting Democratic Congressmembers who voted for the Iraq War in 2002. He supported the wars in Kosovo, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Yemen, and the current bloody inter-imperialist proxy war in Ukraine.

For nearly three decades, Smith has been bankrolled by weapons industry profiteers such as Lockheed Martin, Boeing, General Dynamics, Raytheon, Northrop Grumman, Palantir, General Atomics, and Kymeta.

In 2016, he was one of only 16 Democrats who voted against an amendment to block the transfer of cluster bombs (horrific weapons used for mass indiscriminate killing) to Saudi Arabia for use against the people of Yemen, something for which he has been handsomely rewarded by Textron, the leading manufacturer of cluster bombs.

In 2021, as Chair of the House Armed Services Committee, Smith proudly championed a grotesque $768-billion budget for the Pentagon, making it the largest military budget in U.S. history at the time, and $25 billion over even what President Biden was calling for.

Far from being a foot soldier, Smith is a general among the war hawks. He has helped lead the financing of the ongoing genocide in Gaza as one of the most influential members of the House Armed Services Committee.

Smith is a darling of AIPAC and the Zionist lobby, the weapons industry, and the billionaire class. AIPAC was his biggest funder last year and he has received nearly half a million dollars from the Zionist lobby to date.

In the summer of 2014, I used my City Council office not only to attend protests against Israel’s indiscriminate bombardment on Gaza at the time, but also to draft a public letter calling for an end to all U.S. military aid for Israel, the illegal settlements in the Palestinian territories, and Israel’s occupation of Palestinian lands. During the same time, Smith was enthusiastically backing Israel’s Iron Dome system, a key component enabling the Israeli state’s slaughter apparatus against the Palestinian people.

I used the final days of my decade in City Hall in October and November of 2023 to win the second and the strongest City Council resolution at the time calling for a ceasefire in Gaza and an end to all military aid to Israel. At that moment, Smith was part of Biden’s cabal that was monstrously insisting on over $100 billion military funding for not just Israel, but also the inter-imperialist proxy war in Ukraine, instead of funding the needs of working people struggling with the severe cost-of-living crisis.

Adam Smith and the Corporate Status Quo

Adam Smith stands out as one of the most thoroughly pro-corporate politicians out of all the Democrats in the U.S. Congress and Senate. This is no easy task.

Smith has shown longstanding and unwavering loyalty to Wall Street. He was part of the aggressively pro-corporate, neoliberal offensive of the Democratic Party in the 1990s. The Democratic Party was never a party of the working class, but under Bill Clinton, the party began to more overtly and viciously attack the working class and the labor movement. The initial shift toward neoliberalism and the assault on unions and working people’s living standards actually began even earlier, under Jimmy Carter, as a response by the U.S. ruling class to the end of the postwar boom.

During the George W. Bush presidency, Smith worked to push the Democratic Party further rightward. He expressed concerns that “Too many Democrats want to say, Vote for me because Exxon is screwing you, Chase Manhattan’s screwing you.” His advice to Democrats was to reduce the contrast of Democrats from Bush and the Republicans. He thought the Democratic Party should consider privatizing Medicare, and was anxious that some Democrats would be “reflexively hostile” to attempts by Bush and the Republicans to do so.

Today, with Medicare for All having widespread support, Smith sometimes claims to support it. But this is straight from the Democratic Party’s playbook of performatively expressing support for popular progressive demands that they have no intention of allowing to see the light of day.

Smith has certainly inspired the confidence of the health insurance CEOs. Notorious health insurance corporations like Humana and Cigna, who ferociously oppose Medicare for All, have donated to Smith’s campaigns. Also among his donors is the America’s Health Insurance Plans PAC, which gave over $100 million to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce for a 2009-2010 lobbying campaign to try and derail even meager improvements in healthcare under Obama.

Smith voted in favor of the shameful bailout of big banks in October 2008 while ordinary people were left to rot. He then supported continuing the funding for Wall Street under Obama, again at the expense of working people.

Smith’s position that the Democratic Party needs to move further rightward and become more friendly to big business has only hardened over time. In November of last year, after the Democratic Party’s embarrassing defeat to Trump, he said on Fox News, “If you want to stand up to Trump, I suggest you don’t ever mention him.” In December, appearing with a Seattle-based Trump-supporting podcast host, he railed against what he called “extreme left policies” of the Democratic Party, claiming that’s what handed the election to Trump. This was at a time when, in fact, Biden and Harris were trying to out-Trump Trump. “He sounds more like a Republican than a lot of Republicans,” one right-wing commenter remarked. Smith has even received campaign donations from Elon Musk’s SpaceX PAC, not once or twice, but in every election cycle since 2010.

It is exactly this lurch to the right by the Democratic Party that has allowed Republicans to increasingly attack workers, immigrants, the antiwar movement, trans people, the poor, and other oppressed people.

We aren’t going to stop right-wing attacks and defeat Trump by staying silent and allowing Democrats like Adam Smith to remain in power. We need to use every tool available to us: mass protests, strike action, civil disobedience, and independent election campaigns like the one I’m announcing to defeat warmongers and corporate politicians like Adam Smith.

Importantly, the labor movement also needs to break from the billionaire-backed parties. Most of the labor leadership has spent over three decades giving no-strings-attached endorsements and campaign funds to Democrats (and sometimes even Republicans). In return, most of these Democrats have stabbed workers in the back. Smith is no exception. Having received well over half a million dollars from labor unions since he first went to the U.S. Congress, Smith has sold out workers again and again, including by voting to break the strike of railroad workers in 2022. Labor leaders have allowed Smith to engage in occasional performative gestures while being one of the key Democratic Party enforcers against any substantive progressive gains for working people.

Free Healthcare Now — Tax the Rich!

Support for Medicare for All is at historic highs. “Progressive” Democrats have been talking about “single-payer healthcare” or “Medicare for All” for decades, but every time there is potential to win it, they pull the plug.

This is no accident. It’s a cheap and easy talking point for “progressive” politicians like Pramila Jayapal to raise the flag for Medicare for All when the Republicans are in power, as right now — precisely because they know it won’t go anywhere. In reality, this kind of empty lip service is a mechanism to deceive working people and try to keep them inside the party.

My campaign for Congress will not only be committing to fight all-out for Medicare for All in Washington DC, but I will also simultaneously build momentum for free healthcare through a Seattle ballot initiative.

Workers Strike Back, has just launched a national campaign called Free Healthcare Now, with the model of bypassing both political parties and fighting for free public healthcare, paid for by taxing the rich, through local ballot initiatives.

In Seattle, we are preparing to file a ballot initiative in 2026 which would tax the city’s wealthiest businesses approximately $5 billion a year to fund free healthcare for everyone in the city. This would expand the Amazon Tax that my City Council office won in 2020 alongside working people and the Black Lives Matter movement.

This is a fighting strategy to break through the current impasse. If we can win in one or more cities and states, it can act as a battering ram to win Medicare for All nationally. This is similar to the way Canada won its healthcare system, by starting in a single province, Saskatchewan, before winning nationally. That fight also went hand-in-hand with the struggle for a new party of working people, called the Co-operative Commonwealth Federation.

There is huge support for Medicare for All — as there is for most progressive policies — but year after year it goes nowhere. Why? Because as everyone knows, the Democrats (like Smith) and Republicans are both owned lock, stock and barrel by the health insurance industry, Big Pharma, and the billionaire class.

To win, we need to turn the tables on the parties of the billionaires. We need to build a militant, independent, all-out fight as we prepare the ground for a new party for working people. Working people are fed up with both parties of the billionaires. A plurality of Americans believe neither major party represents them. Going into last year’s election, two-thirds of people believed the country was “moving in the wrong direction,” and now Trump’s “honeymoon” has been the shortest on record. The approval ratings of both Trump in the White House and Democrats in the U.S. Congress are in the gutter, and appropriately so.

Fight the Rich

We need to build an organized, unified movement of working people to systematically take on the ultra rich who run society. Our goal must be to both fight for radical change in the present and to bring down the billionaires and their system.

There is no other path to avoid total disaster for human civilization and the planet. The alternative under capitalism is a hellscape on earth, including the looming threats of both climate disaster and World War III.

We need to fight for Medicare for All, a $25 an hour minimum wage, an end to mass deportations, good union jobs for all, strong national rent control, and a massive expansion of high quality social housing, paid for by taxing the rich. We need to take big energy corporations into democratic public ownership and carry out a lighting-fast transition to renewable energy.

If we’re going to change anything, working people need to be clear about who our enemies are. They are the billionaires and the bosses, the capitalist class, their institutions, their political parties, and also their more deceptive spokespeople, who sometimes appear and sound like they support workers, but really act as pressure release valves and gatekeepers.

We also need to be clear about who our enemies are not. They are not other working-class or middle-class or poor people. They are not immigrants, trans people, ordinary Republican or Democratic voters, nor independent voters or nonvoters.

We Need Militant Fighting Movements

Under capitalism, it should be no surprise that those who own the vast majority of the planet’s wealth also own the politicians.

That’s why I’m a socialist. Because we need a fundamentally different kind of society, run by and for working people, not the billionaires.

There is no reason, in the wealthiest country on earth, that everyone cannot have free healthcare. There is no reason that college should not be free. There is no reason that high quality affordable housing should not be available to all.

But working people won’t win free healthcare, a seat in the U.S. Congress, or anything else without organizing in the millions. Our experience in Seattle shows that we can defeat the rich and their political servants. As we said throughout our decade-long fight with Amazon and Seattle’s corporate elite, “when we fight, we can win.“

I hope you’ll join us.

 

SponsorBlock, Timestamps, and Generated Summary below:


SponsorBlock Timestamps:

  1. 0:00 - 0:44 Introduction: Platner's Rise & The Establishment's Response
  2. 0:44 - 6:10 The First Attack: Problematic Reddit Posts Unveiled
  3. 6:10 - 9:21 The Second Scandal: The Nazi Tattoo Revelation
  4. 9:21 - 16:02 Satire: The "Apology Video" Campaign Cycle
  5. 16:02 - 20:50 Damage Control: Platner's Formal Media Response
  6. 20:50 - 30:23 Analysis: Why The Attacks Failed & The Populist Appeal
  7. 30:23 - 34:32 Broader Context: Hypocrisy and Shifting Party Loyalties
  8. 34:32 - 39:41 Conclusion: Platner's Defiance and a New Political Moment

Generated Summary:

Overview: The Political Attack on Graham Platner

The central narrative is that Graham Platner, a populist-left, ex-military candidate, was leading in the polls against Republican Susan Collins. The Democratic establishment, fearing his insurgent campaign, recruited Governor Janet Mills to run against him and launched a coordinated opposition research ("oppo") dump to derail his candidacy. Despite these attacks, a poll showed Platner's support remained overwhelmingly strong.


Major Points and Segments

1. The Setup: Platner's Rise and the Establishment's Response (0:00 - 0:44)

  • Platner's Initial Success: Platner was portrayed as a strong, populist candidate who was leading Susan Collins by 14 points in general election polls and building significant momentum.
  • The Establishment Intervenes: At the request of Senator Chuck Schumer, the incumbent, pro-Israel Governor Janet Mills entered the race, immediately making the primary highly contested.

2. The Coordinated Attacks: Reddit Posts and Nazi Tattoo (0:44 - 9:21)

The transcript describes a series of scandals broken by mainstream media shortly after Mills entered the race, framed as a clear establishment effort to destroy Platner.

  • The Reddit Posts (2013): The Washington Post reported on old Reddit posts where Platner:
    • Dismissively downplayed the challenges of reporting sexual assault in the military.
    • Made comments about sexual assault that placed responsibility on victims for consuming alcohol and putting themselves in "dangerous situations."
    • His political director resigned over these comments.
  • The Nazi Tattoo Allegation: A video surfaced showing a chest tattoo that resembled the "Totenkopf" (death's head) symbol used by Nazi SS units.
    • Platner's Explanation: He claimed he got the tattoo drunk as a young Marine in Croatia, believing it was just a "cool" skull and crossbones. He stated he was screened for hate symbols multiple times during his subsequent Army and State Department service and no one ever flagged it. He has since covered it up.

3. Satirical Portrayal of a Campaign in Crisis (9:21 - 16:02)

The host provides a satirical commentary, imagining Platner having to make daily apology videos for a never-ending stream of scandals. This segment humorously underscores the perceived absurdity and intensity of the political attacks.

4. Platner's Serious Response and Media Interview (16:02 - 20:50)

  • Formal Apology Video: In a more serious tone, Platner addresses the Reddit posts, framing them as the product of a difficult transition to civilian life after war, suffering from PTSD, and using the internet as an outlet for his "rage" and "isolation." He states he has grown and changed.
  • TV Interview Highlights:
    • He awkwardly handles a question about another Reddit post asking "why black people don't tip," claiming it was part of a thread about asking "uncomfortable questions."
    • He reiterates his ignorance regarding the Nazi affiliation of his tattoo and his anti-fascist beliefs.
    • He dismissively comments on his former political director who resigned, calling her a "stupid [ __ ]" (later played for satire as another thing he'd have to apologize for).
    • He is unconcerned about Republicans using the scandals against him, arguing they would call any Democrat a "communist" regardless.

5. Analysis: Why the Attacks Failed and the Deeper Political Lesson (20:50 - 30:23)

This is the core analytical segment of the transcript.

  • The Poll That Defied Expectations: A University of New Hampshire poll, conducted largely after the scandals broke, showed Platner leading Mills 58% to 24%—a 34-point lead.
  • The Key Insight: Populism Appeals to Moderates: The host argues this proves a lesson the Democratic establishment "refuses to learn":
    • While liberals preferred Mills (44% to 40%), moderates broke heavily for the left-wing populist Platner (29-point margin).
    • This mirrors the 2016 Bernie Sanders phenomenon, where his working-class signaling resonated with moderates and voters in conservative states more than the "platitudinous PMC gobbledegook" of establishment candidates.
  • The Democratic Party's Real Purpose: The host contends the party is not a political organization with political aims, but a "professional organization" focused on the careers and financial grift of its members. A true populist like Platner threatens the donor base and the revolving door of lucrative post-government jobs.

6. Broader Political Context and Reactions (21:25 - 27:09)

  • Contrast with Other Scandals: Comments contrast Bernie Sanders' continued support for Platner with the White House dropping an appointee over racist texts, and a commentator's failed attempt to deny Donald Trump's history of racism.
  • Hypocrisy and Tone-Deafness: The host and commentators see hypocrisy in the "woke" establishment trying to cancel a left-wing candidate for not being "woke" enough in his past. They also find the attack on a veteran for being "messed up" after war to be particularly galling.

7. Conclusion: Platner's Resilience and the Shifting Base (34:32 - 39:41)

  • Platner's Defiant Town Hall: The segment ends with a clip from a well-attended town hall where Platner gives a powerful speech. He admits shame for his past words but proudly stands by who he is today, defiantly stating the establishment's attacks have only strengthened his resolve.
  • A "Tea Party Moment" for the Left: The host concludes that the Democratic base is showing newfound "autonomy," no longer blindly following party leadership. This is attributed to the "broken" trust after the Biden debate meltdown and the recognition that the party's interests (grifting) are not aligned with the voters' interests (winning and having a candidate who represents them). The successes of figures like Platner and "Mamdani" signal a potential fundamental shift in the political landscape.

About Channel:

the post-civilization left

Due Dissidence is a multimedia one-stop shop for left politics and gallows humor in written, audio, and video form.

[–] jimmydoreisalefty@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I think this is a normal reaction, to be defensive, when being called out from the left, labeling the messenger the boogeyman so as to dismiss any thinking and move on.

We should have standards.

A genocide should have raised the standards for choosing politicians while increasing our demands.

The duopoly is a broken system.

We must stop our celebrity worshipping and hold politicians to our demands.

We should continue to build up our communities and unite the poor and working class.

"We should focus our actions, time, and resources on direct action, mutual aid, and community outreach. If you do engage in electoral politics, do not support the duopoly (red or blue team). No War but Class War!"

Thank you for your reply!

My communication needs improvement, but being direct seems to fit in this chat.

Shortened Version:


Zohran Mamdani, the Democratic front-runner for mayor of New York City, said he intends to ask Jessica Tisch to stay on as police commissioner if he is elected. The decision is likely to placate powerful New Yorkers and caps a months-long lobbying campaign.

For Mamdani, a democratic socialist with a history of criticizing the police, the choice is significant. He confirmed the decision in a debate, stating, “I’ve said time and again that my litmus test for that position will be excellence.”

The move is a strategic one, aiming to counter attacks from rivals who portray him as hostile to law enforcement. The ideological differences between the two are stark: Mamdani once called the department “racist” and “anti-queer” (positions he has since disavowed), while Tisch is a billionaire heiress who has pushed for stricter criminal justice laws.

Campaign aides believe Mamdani can work with Tisch to implement key promises, including creating the community safety department to shift responsibility for mental health episodes away from the police. This plan, along with proposals to cut the police overtime budget and disband the unit that handles protests, is likely to face internal opposition.

The decision has drawn praise from establishment figures but skepticism from others. Former Commissioner William Bratton said he would advise Tisch to decline, stating, “I think she would have an extraordinarily difficult time working with him.”^[[1] https://web.archive.org/web/20251024065716/https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/22/nyregion/jessica-tisch-nypd-mamdani.html]

[–] jimmydoreisalefty@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago

All is well.

2:18:53.800 - 2:56:43.500 Tucker Carlson Faces Young MAGA

Looking back at the Tucker segment, did you agree with Sabby's commentary, or did you have a different view? Or was it a bit of both?

[–] jimmydoreisalefty@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Did you watch the video...

It seems you replied after just reading the title...

I thought the video was simple and direct.

All is well.

Peace.

[–] jimmydoreisalefty@lemmy.world -5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The Fourth Branch^[[1] The 4th Branch - Immortal Technique | Lyrics (05:18 | Rap, New York Rap, Perú, East Coast Rap, Conscious Hip-Hop, Politics) | https://youtube.com/watch?v=2ffxUT7Puf0 | https://lemmy.world/post/36943977].

I think it has to do with propaganda and the continued political tribalism and divide-and-conquer of the working class and poor.

The only difference is some believe they are immune or above its influence, while some try to take account of it and continue to learn from not only government and establishment sources but dissident views and independent journalists as well.

We never stopped calling out the duopoly, and we never will join the establishment and celebrity worship talking points.

[–] jimmydoreisalefty@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago

The unrelated cases, identified in Long Beach and Los Angeles county, involve patients who had not recently traveled abroad. All three were hospitalized and are now recovering, according to the California department of public health.

Mpox is a viral infection that often begins with flu-like symptoms such as fever, chills and muscle aches. These are usually followed by a rash that starts as small raised spots, then develop into fluid-filled blisters before forming scabs.

Dr Rita Nguyen, assistant state public health officer, said in Friday’s statement that “clade I mpox cases can be severe” and the “risk of severe disease and hospitalization are highest for people with weakened immune systems.”

Anyone can contract mpox through close physical contact, including sex. Past outbreaks of clade II primarily affected gay and bisexual men and transgender or non-binary people who have sex with men. California’s public health department now believes person-to-person spread of clade I is occurring in California, mainly affecting these communities.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has reported six prior US clade I cases, all linked to travel abroad. The first was detected in San Mateo county in 2024. Officials said the overall risk to the public remains low, and casual contact in settings like offices or public transit is unlikely to spread the virus.

The Jynneos vaccine protects against both clade I and II mpox. It is a two-dose series given a month apart, with full immunity reached two weeks after the second dose. No booster is currently recommended.

The CDC said it is not known how long vaccine protection might last, or if protection might decrease over time, according to its website. The public health agency is analyzing the current data and conducting studies to better understand how the Jynneos vaccine works amid the current mpox outbreak, as well as how long protection might last.^[[1] https://web.archive.org/web/20251022082910/https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/oct/20/three-cases-severe-mpox-california]

[–] jimmydoreisalefty@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

FYI:

Sign in to confirm your age

This video may be inappropriate for some users.


Edit:

  1. Added generated summary
  2. Replaced and redid the generated summary, more details and timestamps

Generated Summary:

Hong Kong Under Chinese Control: A Critical Examination

This video challenges the Western media narrative surrounding the Hong Kong protests and the subsequent imposition of the National Security Law. It argues that the situation is more complex than a simple fight for freedom and democracy, suggesting that Western interference and a separatist movement with racist undertones played significant roles. The video further posits that Hong Kong enjoys more freedom under Chinese control than it did under British rule, highlighting the lack of democracy prior to the handover and the economic instability caused by the protests. It also delves into the cultural and linguistic aspects of Hong Kong's identity.

  • 01:43 Historical Context: British Colonialism: The video begins by questioning the legitimacy of British rule in Hong Kong, setting the stage for its argument that Chinese control is not inherently oppressive.
  • 03:54 Lack of Democracy Under British Rule: A key argument is that Hong Kong did not have democracy before the Chinese takeover, thus challenging the notion that China is solely responsible for suppressing freedom.
  • 06:20 "One Country, Two Systems": The video explains the framework under which Hong Kong operates, highlighting the intended autonomy granted to the region.
  • 09:04 Western Interference: The video alleges that Western powers have interfered in Hong Kong's affairs, exacerbating tensions and fueling the protest movement.
  • 13:35 Racist Undertones of Separatism: A controversial claim is made that the separatist movement in Hong Kong is largely driven by racism.
  • 16:18 Right-Wing Ideology: The video further characterizes the separatist movement as right-wing, adding another layer of complexity to its analysis.
  • 18:08 Emigration of Hong Kongers: The video acknowledges that some Hong Kongers have left the region, but frames this within the context of broader political and economic factors.
  • 21:54 Protests Re-examined: The video questions the motives and actions of the protesters, suggesting they were not solely driven by a desire for democracy.
  • 26:32 Characterizing Protests as Riots: The video explicitly labels the protests as "riots," emphasizing the violence and disruption they caused.
  • 32:33 National Security Law: The implementation of the National Security Law is presented as a response to the riots and a measure to restore stability.
  • 35:52 Root Causes of Hong Kong's Problems: The video identifies factors beyond Chinese control as contributing to Hong Kong's issues.
  • 41:09 Cultural Shifts: The video touches upon the evolving cultural landscape of Hong Kong.
  • 42:43 Language Debate: The Cantonese language debate is presented as a central element of Hong Kong's identity and its relationship with China.
  • 43:51 Importance of the Narrative: The video concludes by emphasizing the significance of understanding the Hong Kong narrative from multiple perspectives.
[–] jimmydoreisalefty@lemmy.world -1 points 3 weeks ago

pulled headlines from the same sources for the left and the right columns.

I agree; it would have made it more apparent and noticeable.

[–] jimmydoreisalefty@lemmy.world -1 points 3 weeks ago

You are welcome.

Weird.

Peace.

view more: next ›