this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2025
395 points (96.9% liked)

You Should Know

41087 readers
20 users here now

YSK - for all the things that can make your life easier!

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with YSK.

All posts must begin with YSK. If you're a Mastodon user, then include YSK after @youshouldknow. This is a community to share tips and tricks that will help you improve your life.



Rule 2- Your post body text must include the reason "Why" YSK:

**In your post's text body, you must include the reason "Why" YSK: It’s helpful for readability, and informs readers about the importance of the content. **



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-YSK posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-YSK posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

If you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- The majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Rule 11- Posts must actually be true: Disiniformation, trolling, and being misleading will not be tolerated. Repeated or egregious attempts will earn you a ban. This also applies to filing reports: If you continually file false reports YOU WILL BE BANNED! We can see who reports what, and shenanigans will not be tolerated. We are not here to ban people who said something you don't like.

If you file a report, include what specific rule is being violated and how.



Partnered Communities:

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

Credits

Our icon(masterpiece) was made by @clen15!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 148 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (5 children)

You should know, that's unconstitutional.

Edit: what the fuck is this appeals court smoking? "Money is speech... no not like that." So I guess every political donation that is not known to the public is also not free speech?

You cannot dictate what a business or individual spends its money on or why. Burn this fucking state to the ground and start over.

[–] KindnessisPunk@piefed.ca 90 points 2 weeks ago

They basically just ruled that piracy is legal for meta in their case about scraping Anna's archieve for their AI.

The class divide is very literally getting baked into our legal framework. I know it's always been there, in an unspoken manner, but it's making strides in being letter of the law now.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 46 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

what the fuck is this appeals court smoking?

A big joint labeled "AIPAC" that got passed to them in a Federalist Society blunt rotation.

You cannot dictate what a business or individual spends its money on or why.

You absolutely can and we routinely do. Just look at the embargo of Cuba, for instance.

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago (24 children)

You can ban imports, you cannot dictate that I buy products from fucking Walmart.

load more comments (24 replies)
[–] hector@lemmy.today 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Well also keep in mind that the Israelis have our politicians compromised, not just on the Epstein stuff, probably a range of issues, and seemingly our CIA and FBI did nothing to stop it if not more likely helped them do it.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

seemingly our CIA and FBI did nothing to stop it

Why would they stop it? J. Edgar Hoover spent his entire career at the FBI trying to extort elected leaders into doing what he wanted. And don't even get me started on the Dulles Brothers.

Pretty much their entire job to curb the more popular impulses of a liberal democracy.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Allowing a foreign intelligence agency to get blackmail on our politicians is in open Defiance of the reason for being of the FBI and CIA.

They clearly have their priorities screwed up, and by All Rights should live the rest of their lives in a work camp on the North Slope of Alaska building public housing for the inuit.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Allowing a foreign intelligence agency to get blackmail on our politicians is in open Defiance of the reason for being of the FBI and CIA.

Not if the foreign intelligence agency is working in concert with the FBI and CIA.

by All Rights should live the rest of their lives in a work camp on the North Slope of Alaska building public housing for the inuit

I wouldn't hold my breath waiting.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AlexLost@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

*States

Fixed it for you. You are welcome.

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Minnesota is in the same appeals circuit and deserves better.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TragicNotCute@lemmy.world 47 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

The headline you’ve written is factually inaccurate. They prevent the state from doing business with contractors who boycott Israel. It’s a very different thing. The state of Texas also prohibits its state employees from doing the same.

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago

Texas takes it several steps further. Victims of Hurricane Harvey had to sign antiBDS statements. Flooding a few months ago added a disclaimer that you recognize the right for Israel to exist

And Kansas. I had to sign a document acknowledging it. I have no intention of honoring that contract.

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.world 32 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's not just Arkansas, most states have antiBDS laws in place. Many of them do not allow contracting with the state, state employment, or receiving state disaster assistance if you hold BDS ideology.

collapsed inline mediaStars in purple have active antiBDS laws in place

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] BaldManGoomba@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions

[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

I only refuse to buy, want to get rid of our stake in, and want to restrict it. So I'm in the clear whew

[–] Nemo@slrpnk.net 21 points 2 weeks ago

Whether or not a boycott is protected speech is one thing (though I would think it is) but forcing someone to sign a pledge is absolutely compelled speech and a violation of the First Amendment. And from the dissent opinion on this most recent decision, it sounds like the law is ill-formed and overbroad.

If the government of Arkansas wants to not do business with contractors who boycott Israel, perhaps that's their right. Forcing a pledge is not.

[–] Strider@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I'm not even American but how would you even prove that? (eg. Not buying certain products..?)

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The title is misleading. It bans state contractors from boycotting Israel, so there can be a certain amount of checking up.

[–] Strider@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago
[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I heard about this a few years ago when I first moved here. It's only for government contractors.

[–] Strider@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Ah, I see.

US headlines are often misleading internationally so that helps!

(of course one could read each article but thats hardly possible in total)

[–] GlendatheGayWitch@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Don't put words in the mouth of the law. We have something similar in TX. If you are a government employee you have to agree not to "boycott Israel". It doesn't say boycott Israeli products or companies. It says "boycott Israel" itself, so you just can't say that you'll never travel there.

[–] Strider@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why me? I reached to the (it seems wrongly worded) news.

Try to be a bit more open minded to foreigners' questions please.

[–] GlendatheGayWitch@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It wasn't meant as a slight to you. It was more a comment on how they worded the law.

Kind of like how the news will turn trumps ramblings into coherent thoughts. We shouldn't modify the language of poorly written laws to make sense of them. That hurts the people governed by them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

So if deliberately not buying Israeli stuff is illegal, does that imply everyone has to buy a minimum of Israeli stuff? Or can they continue to not buy Israeli stuff, as long as it's without mens rea?

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 3 points 1 week ago

Boycott and just be quiet about it

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 17 points 1 week ago

Considering that they have rigged consumer devices to explode, I think boycotting them is a very wise decision.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 16 points 2 weeks ago

How can it be illegal to boycott something? You're required by law to buy things from Israel?

[–] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago

Fuck Israel, genocidal scum!

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

So the state forces you to buy from Israel?

What a country.

[–] balder1991@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

It’s for State contracts apparently.

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Hardly surprising from people whose family tree looks more like a circle.

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago

California and New York have similar laws

collapsed inline mediaas do most states.
Those in purple have anti BDS laws in place

That's a really fucked up thing to say. I get it's a joke, but holy hell.

[–] Cyberflunk@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

America is starting to feel that yoke

[–] HurlingDurling@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Starting? Shit ain't funny any more... Not that its ever been honestly

[–] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

YSK, that's not what it says or means...

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 2 points 2 weeks ago

38 states to the best of my knowledge.

load more comments
view more: next ›