this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2025
386 points (99.5% liked)

Leopards Ate My Face

7769 readers
1174 users here now

Rules:

  1. The mods are fallible; if you've been banned or had a post/comment removed, please appeal.
  2. Off-topic posts will be removed. If you don't know what "Leopards ate my Face" is, try reading this post.
  3. If the reason your post meets Rule 1 isn't in the source, you must add a source in the post body (not the comments) to explain this.
  4. Posts should use high-quality sources, and posts about an article should have the same headline as that article. You may edit your post if the source changes the headline. For a rough idea, check out this list.
  5. For accessibility reasons, an image of text must either have alt text or a transcription in the post body.
  6. Reposts within 1 year or the Top 100 of all time are subject to removal.
  7. This is not exclusively a US politics community. You're encouraged to post stories about anyone from any place in the world at any point in history as long as you meet the other rules.
  8. All Lemmy.World Terms of Service apply.

Also feel free to check out !leopardsatemyface@lemm.ee (also active).

Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] P1nkman@lemmy.world 111 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] applebusch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 week ago

I mean yeah but I'm kind of getting sick of the leopards eating people's faces. It was kind of cathartic at first because of the irony but it's still leopards eating people's faces. Sooner or later it's going to be my face and I voted for no leopards eating anyone's face let alone mine.

[–] aramis87@fedia.io 99 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

many of the communities that rely most heavily on federal dollars are in Republican-led states, which tend to spend less on education and often have higher child poverty rates.

Sounds like socialism, which Republicans hate. Good on them for sticking by their principles! ... Oh, wait ...

“We don’t have a problem with the federal Department of Education being dissolved,” said Dr. Willingham, a Republican. “We have a problem with funding being taken from our children.”

So you want the money with no oversight? Didn't you guys just take a chainsaw to the federal government because of "waste and fraud"? How do you think money without oversight is going to work out?

[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 38 points 2 weeks ago

So you want the money with no oversight? Didn't you guys just take a chainsaw to the federal government because of "waste and fraud"? How do you think money without oversight is going to work out?

Think? No, they reacted. Thinking hard.

[–] brown567@sh.itjust.works 21 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If only there were a popular children's story that could have warned them against dismantling a resource-providing system in an attempt to acquire more resource

[–] Archer@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Perhaps if there were an allegorical story about how you shouldn’t trust politicians delivered the by the politician in question, maybe they would have understood then

[–] Banzai51@midwest.social 12 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Easier to steal the money that way and/or funnel it into bible study in a public school, of course that's what they want.

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 71 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Ah, a classic 😚👌

collapsed inline mediayou voted for this

Sorry for the children though. They didn't.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 39 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

And the children are the ones who will suffer the most

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 11 points 1 week ago

"Pro life until birth"

[–] pressedhams@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 2 weeks ago

Suffering is the point! And then they have more undereducated fodder for the capitalist machine!

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 34 points 2 weeks ago
[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 25 points 2 weeks ago

"I love the poorly educated"- Trump, 2016

[–] taco@piefed.social 22 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Maybe I'm still just waiting for the morning caffeine to hit, but I don't think that first sentence has any business using a comma.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

"Correct, you are."

  • Master Dave Yoda
[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

You, are correct.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The big problem/benefit of federal school funding is it tends to come with strings. Woke stuff like accessibility, special needs, girls sports, accreditation.

Most of us see this as a huge benefit, setting some minimum standards for public education. Magats may not, although I believe they like the money and just want to be free to oppress minorities

[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 9 points 2 weeks ago

An interesting fact about this particular issue is the lack of Republican support (as it stands): https://www.edweek.org/policy-politics/senators-including-republicans-reject-all-of-trumps-proposed-education-cuts/2025/07

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Can the US already just split?

Red states can be the United States of America, a third world shit hole country that can't even feed its own citizens, rampant poverty and all of it based on racism and extremist religion

Blue states can make a new Country, FFS call it something not too "braggy" as Americans tend to do. This country can become one of the wealthiest counties in the world with great education, great freehealthcare, everyone being taken care of through extensive social safety nets. Also it would have all the nukes because nobody wants a religious end time cult with nukes.

I seriously don't see how this sad excuse of a country can continue like this.

[–] Tedesche@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

It’s unfortunately not that simple. The bulk of America’s farmland is in red states, so blue states on their own wouldn’t be able to feed their populations. Plus, red states tend not to have the biggest trade cities in the country, so they’d be choked in trade on their own. Also, all states break down into blue and red counties. Basically, if you’re a rural county, you tend to be red, and if you’re an urban or sub-urban county, you tend to be blue. So, even red states have plenty of democrats in them and vice versa.

[–] Glytch@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

It worked out so well for the Balkans...

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I thought only like 8% of school funding most places was federal

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 2 weeks ago

As a nationwide average, yes. Rural schools tend to depend on it more than city schools. Students are more spread apart, and they don't have a large property tax base.

Plus, even an 8% cut would hurt a lot when they've already been squeezed the last few years.

[–] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Closer to like ~20%, most of the funding goes to programs that help students that don't have rich parents. Like reduced lunches, help with special staff to help students with learning issues, etc.

Federal funding for schools isn't this crazy shit MAGA talks about. It helps with paying teachers, staff, student programs, etc. It's not lining the pockets of anybody. Just assisting public education.