this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

16715 readers
73 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] projektilski@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 weeks ago

The only problem is that VIVALDI could not implement feature of 5 minutes of work which was requested many years ago. Fuck'em.

[–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 0 points 2 weeks ago

Just want to chime in and say that Karl Marx was also an econ major.

Yet, being an economist, he also neglected to base his theories in any real science, only in "business science", which is why I'm a proponent of Kropotkin instead.

[–] Lembot_0004@discuss.online 0 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Arts/humanities majors are useless. Nobody needs them. Nobody wants them. Except for McDonald's, drug dealer and a crematorium.

[–] Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Another Lembot? Must be a cursed production line...

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They keep getting banned for horrendous opinions and make a new account every month or two. I just find it amusing that they figured they'd get banned around 10000 times so they preemptively used 4 digits in their username

[–] exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 weeks ago

10000 times so they preemptively used 4 digits in their username

Wait it hasn't been shown that this is a decimal system, it might be up to 65,536 in hexadecimal

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 weeks ago

^ business school level education.

[–] halvar@lemy.lol 0 points 2 weeks ago

you'd like that wouldn't you

[–] Blackout@fedia.io 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

MBAs have destroyed the world. We used to have good paying jobs and affordable rent.

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I'm sure there's probably a few good MBA's out there, using applied psychology to trick assholes into spending their money on the greater good.

collapsed inline media

I've never met one but, statistically, you know?

[–] jimrob4@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Hi, 'tis me, leftist with a business degree and minor in psychology that works in marketing. 🙃

[–] jimrob4@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

"You know, spending money on welfare and education is a lot less expensive than prisons and having your stuff stolen."

I’ve considered working in marketing, but I refuse to use my powers for evil.

[–] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The world is powered by a collective STEAM engine:

Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, Mathematics.

Arts is such a fundamental component for communicating advancements and inspiring the creativity that fuels further discoveries.

[–] porksnort@slrpnk.net 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

But, but KPI’s are how we know line go up.

Checkmate, artists!

[–] chellomere@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The artists can assist by drawing a line that goes more up. Problem solved!

[–] spankinspinach@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 weeks ago

Notably, an esthetically pleasing line!

[–] astronaut_sloth@mander.xyz 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Everyone should have a strong base in STEM and the humanities. It irks me to no end when STEM majors can't write, communicate, or understand a wider historical context just as it irks me when humanities majors claim to not understand basic algebra or scientific concepts. It's fine to have a preference, but an expert engineer should have a passing familiarity with philosophy and ethics, just as a historian should have a passing familiarity with scientific laws and mathematics.

Then there's business majors who have no familiarity with anything at all. If I had my druthers, "business school" wouldn't even be an option at a university.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Not to knock college undergrad core curriculum, but that strong base ought to be acquired before graduating high school.

[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 0 points 2 weeks ago

No can do, gotta teach students how to pass the tests that gives the school federal funding

[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

That’s what I’ve been saying since I was in high school. Going into college, the first year felt like High School 2.0. My English professor outright asked, “Why are you in this class? I have nothing I can teach you.” Funny how we can take a test after admission to show us which subjects we need remedial classes for, but no test for us to opt-out of subjects that we’ve already mastered. Still gotta take our money and waste our time because, you know, “requirements.”

Edit: I’ve heard some people say there are opt-out tests some places, but that clearly isn’t the default. Not at the community college I went to.

[–] toofpic@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

As a marketeer, I'm fine with that!

[–] lemjukes@sopuli.xyz 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] toofpic@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

Yes, yes, release your anger!

[–] lemjukes@sopuli.xyz 0 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Good, an MBA is just a degree in exploitation. I will fight you over this take like a goddamn racoon over the last piece of food in the dumpster.

[–] exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah but an MBA is also a post graduate degree. A huge chunk of MBAs have undergrad degrees in something like STEM or humanities.

[–] lemjukes@sopuli.xyz 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And with the power of that knowledge they decided to specialize and get a masters of exploitation.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 0 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Econ is for soothsayers, idiots, cultists and abusers, don't bother to change my mind.

[–] lemjukes@sopuli.xyz 0 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

the entrails say... "something, something, irrational exuberance"

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I find the field is only good when combined with humanities as a focal point, e.g. economic history or economic anthropology. It needs grounded otherwise it goes full American Psycho.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org 0 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

People are often young and naive when they choose what to study. There are some decent people and some assholes among business majors, just like with most other groups of people if you look closely.

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 0 points 2 weeks ago

There are certainly nice and polite people everywhere, but decency is a matter of ethics in this context, I would say. At least that's how I'm reading it.

Like I'm a nice guy, but I'm not going to pretend it's decent of me to replace data workers with software automation, even if it's just the natural outcome of me putting my education into practice.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

But what if you're right and I want to join?

[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Stem major checking in for an arts/humanities major to hold hands with

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The real problem is believing there's an objective difference between art, science, humanities, etc. It's an artificial division under capitalism between what's directly useful for profit, control, etc. and what's not.

Regardless, yeah fuck business school. That's got no value to anybody.

[–] plyth@feddit.org 0 points 2 weeks ago

Who is holding them up in the sky?

Astrology!

[–] Limonene@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

As a STEM graduate, I would much rather hold hands with an econ graduate than a business graduate. Economists can do real good for the world, while MBAs seem to be mostly harmful.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Economists can do real good for the world

If you put 10 economists in a room, you’ll get 11 opinions.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] EightBitBlood@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

As an econ major with a BS, please don't lump me in with the econ majors who went to business school for a MBA. I like cool math, not venture capitalism cancer.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] EightBitBlood@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The only thing funny about the Laffer curve is how little it now matters.

It was used to justify Reagnomics, which then immediately proved we weren't nearly as high on the Laffer curve as we assumed. Because of this, we have concrete evidence that lowering taxes on the rich doesn't increase government revenues.

Yet we're still doing that 50 years later. Despite the only vaguely scientific thing behind it proving it doesn't work decades ago.

Imagine being in a catholic family, reading the Bible, and always walking away thinking that Judas did the right thing (despite everything else the Bible says). That's US economic policy for the last 50 years.

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] EightBitBlood@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

My favorite paper published last year includes the following, now scientifically proven statements:

The preponderance of the evidence shows that rising income inequality slows economic growth [3], [4], [5], [6]. Recent analyses have shown that once one controls for wealth inequality the negative effect of income inequality on economic growth falls away as statistically insignificant, and that it has in fact been wealth inequality that has been detrimental to growth either in an inverse linear form or in the form of an inverse u-shape À la Kuznets [7], [8], [9], [10].

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S003801212400003X

So economically speaking, Econ math just proved that we need to eat the rich in order to improve anything.

From the same paper above:

From a policy perspective, the ongoing increase in the concentration of wealth is one of the main socio-economic failures of our time [1]. Not only is it likely to depress economic growth in some countries, as we measure here, it has fueled social unrest, political polarization, and populist nationalism.... redistributing wealth from the rich to the poor may well be growth-enhancing in most countries

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] callouscomic@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 weeks ago

When your econ program is in a business college, they push the MBA hardcore. So glad I never entertained that.

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 0 points 2 weeks ago

The ownership class and their mba lackeys have done a real bang up job not only separating the two cultures, but getting them both to think through the mental model of business and profit whenever they're pondering how to practice their profession.

[–] Hackworth@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 weeks ago

One may draw upon the dark arts with any degree. -BA in Film, make ads

[–] shaggyb@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

Fucking finally we're talking sense.

load more comments
view more: next ›