this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2025
166 points (96.6% liked)

politics

22497 readers
2637 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rikudou@lemmings.world 68 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Which idiot created the title?

For anyone interested: there wasn't any Signal security failure, someone sent stuff via Signal to people they shouldn't have.

[–] jhymesba@lemmy.world 37 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The Guardian, reporting Trump's own words. So I guess ultimately the idiot that created the title is the idiot currently in charge.

Massive fucking OpSec failure. All on the nupties that Trump has hired to run his admin. And of course, the buck stops anywhere but at Mango Mussolini's desk.

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 30 points 5 days ago

Number of "glitches" during the Trump Administration: 1

Number of "glitches" during all other administrations combined: 0

This isn't exactly the stellar defense Trump thinks it is. It's like saying "The doctor isn't a quack. This is the only time he replaced a patient's heart with a baked potato in two months!"

[–] Vertelleus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 5 days ago

Lock him up!
Lock him up!
Lock him---oh it doesn't matter when you do it.

[–] NotLemming@lemm.ee 22 points 5 days ago

I'm going to set fire to some electric cars and then in court my defense will be that it was my only glitch in decades /s

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 17 points 5 days ago
  1. no it's not

  2. that's still a big fucking glitch

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 17 points 5 days ago

He is not wrong. Because anything else that happened in the last two was a string of catastrophies.

[–] JoShmoe@ani.social 15 points 5 days ago

You had one job, and still you managed to leak data through the most secure software on the planet. When’s he gonna start shouting out Hilary Clinton again?

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 14 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The first glitch was him winning.

No, that was called cheating

[–] Late2TheParty@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago

I absolutely despise this timeline.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago

If he said it, then there have definitely been many more "glitches" prior; this is just the first one that became widely publicized.

[–] tonytins@pawb.social 5 points 5 days ago

This is up there with his "well-oiled machine" statement.