this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2025
370 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

75087 readers
3204 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] stardustsystem@lemmy.world 103 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

If there's someone prepared to argue in court about why the UK's Act is a terrible idea, holy crap is it NOT 4chan

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 26 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I wonder how discovery would go.

[–] omgboom@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

"Your honor here is 30 terabytes of beastiality porn, we think what you want is somewhere in there, have fun going through it"

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I am surprised they are asking for any legal action at all instead of just laughing at it and ignoring all messaging from Ofcom. Maybe responding with a few shitposts

[–] burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 3 weeks ago

Probably because the US has agreements with the UK about prosecution of folks for stuff like this, and the resulting handling of court ordered punishments like fines. We only ignore things like that if you're a spouse of a cia agent or something.

[–] brsrklf@jlai.lu 95 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I absolutely don't care what happens to 4chan, but UK starting to fine the internet for being available there and not complying with their bullshit is worrying.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 63 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Go 4chan!

Not often I get to say that, but this is one case.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 55 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

“4chan asks Donald Trump for help”

What a weird world.

[–] BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works 19 points 3 weeks ago

Indeed, feeling the need to check, I can tell you that we're not in the onion anymore...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nandeEbisu@lemmy.world 51 points 3 weeks ago (10 children)

Calling 4chan the most hateful site on the Internet ignores the fact that xitter is a thing.

The kind of hateful rhetoric and grooming are not unique to 4chan, they happen on Facebook, discord, and roblox. 4chan has just been a minimally filtered representation of underground online cultures for decades now meaning it's still just as much a font of creativity as it is a cesspool of internet refuse.

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

4chan has been mostly dead as a place of creativity for years. /b/ is mostly creepshots, AI generated porn, and a guy who has been spamming a picture inviting you to eat Andy Sixx’s shit for like 5 years now. /pol/ is basically Stormfront lite.

/lit/ and /mu/ were some of the best parts of 4chan but are shells of their former selves, some of the sfw boards sometimes have things of value but it’s time to move on.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] angstylittlecatboy@reddthat.com 6 points 3 weeks ago

4chan's creativity died when the first Soyjak was posted.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Pamasich@kbin.earth 40 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm a bit confused by comments on this topic. Do sovereign countries not have the right anymore to decide their own laws and issue punishment when they're not followed?

Like, they obviously can't enforce these fines. This article says as much. The fines can't be enforced, but if 4chan ignores them, that opens the door for other measures like delisting the site from search engines or blocking access to it from the UK (these two examples are taken from the article). Which are fair measures imo.

Like, to the people saying UK can't do laws which apply to services which are merely accessible in the UK and have no physical presence there, do you also apply this logic to the GDPR, which works the same way? The US has these laws too, like COPPA iirc. It's not really something the UK came up with, it's a bit of a standard with laws like this as far as I know.

[–] Hubi@feddit.org 20 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I’m a bit confused by comments on this topic. Do sovereign countries not have the right anymore to decide their own laws and issue punishment when they’re not followed?

Some laws are bullshit and I commend everyone who decides to ignore them.

but if 4chan ignores them, that opens the door for other measures like delisting the site from search engines or blocking access to it from the UK (these two examples are taken from the article)

This has already happened to a number of sites and services, with some voluntarily blocking access from the UK. 4chan's approach is just a bit different in the way that they are waiting to get blocked instead of doing the blocking themselves. It sucks for citizens from the UK, but they are the ones that put the people in power who created those laws.

Like, to the people saying UK can’t do laws which apply to services which are merely accessible in the UK and have no physical presence there, do you also apply this logic to the GDPR, which works the same way?

This has also been the case already. There are a number of American websites that will just straight up deny you access if you visit them from a EU country. Some even cite GDPR as the reason for being blocked. I don't think it's the best solution, but I accept it because I wouldn't want to visit a site that cannot comply with it anyways.

[–] hal_5700X@sh.itjust.works 40 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Can we just block the UK from the Internet. So they can have their own Internet, like China. That will solve a lot of problems.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dogs0n@sh.itjust.works 32 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I hope this encourages more companies/sites to fight back against stupid laws. If most keep complying, it'll only get worse for them in the future when they make even worse laws.

Pull out all UK servers and ignore uk fines (assuming thats legal wherever u reside... idk how that works) or just pull out of uk.

I hope a country like switzerland or something lets companies host servers there for europe without enforcing dumb laws from uk/european union.

[–] Pamasich@kbin.earth 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I hope a country like switzerland or something lets companies host servers there for europe without enforcing dumb laws from uk/european union.

Not going to happen with Switzerland and EU laws. Being completely surrounded by the EU, we're really bad with leverage and are already struggling to not have worse and worse deals forced on us. Plus, we have our own Chat Control type law coming up (which is why Proton is leaving). There's no way we'll take a stance against EU law.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 30 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I'm pulled back and forth with this one. On the one hand, 4chan is a shithole that should be taken care of. On the other side, UK laws that try to govern the internet are so overly deranged shit.

[–] sleen@lemmy.zip 10 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

"Taken care of", so how does this kind of perspective differ from the protection law?

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] chunes@lemmy.world 23 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Why would an American website pay fines because of the laws of a random country?

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

If you offer a service in a country you are subject to their laws.

[–] deathbird@mander.xyz 19 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I'm not sure I like the idea that you're "offering a service" in a country simply by being a data service that can accessed from it.

Someone from Australia can call me and we can chat. It doesn't mean I or my phone carrier are offering a service in Australia.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

My website is my website. You visit my website, my website does not visit you. My website is public, you choose to enter it. You visit my website through your infrastructure to get to my infrastructure. My infrastructure is publicly available to you, should you be able to access it.

The governing body of your (second person, not you specifically) infrastructure (the UK government) chooses to impose rules on my actions. Their threat is "we'll stop letting people in our infrastructure from being able to reach your infrastructure."

That is extortion, not working in the public's favor. The UK government is saying they'll block all roads from your house that lead to my website outside of the UK. My website is overseas, brother. The UK is blocking all the ports so you can't sail here. I don't "offer services" to you in the UK, I just don't prevent people from the UK from trying to reach my island. Nothing about my services requires the UK infrastructure. My services keep operating whether the UK government exists or not. How do they have any right over my infrastructure in this scenario?

If this is about ads, the UK has all the right to remove my ads from their country. That is within their right. Anything about blocking people from the UK is within their right, sure, but that's not my problem lol. Sorry you have a shit government lol

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CoffeeTails@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

What does that mean? Arent most sites available everywhere by default?

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] CriticalMiss@lemmy.world 19 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I don’t really understand how this works. If I’m a company whose entire infrastructure is in the US (for example, I don’t know if 4chan is like that) how can I get in trouble with the UK? I don’t have a legal entity there, I’m not doing any business on their soil whatsoever, how can they enforce their laws against me?

[–] dogs0n@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 weeks ago

I think it only works if the country you are in allows it to happen, as in they have an understanding with the UK (in this case) to follow through with legal stuff. If they were in russia (for example), the UK probably couldn't enforce anything.

Think it is down to the government of your country.

They're "doing business" there by serving ads to their citizens, that's the legal basis for suing them. Whether that goes anywhere depends on the laws governing the business and any leverage UK has (say, going after advertising who do business with the company and in the UK).

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago

Trump admin: "We literally want the same exact thing."

[–] LaunchesKayaks@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)
[–] ebolapie@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

4chan is a very stubborn website

[–] bss03@infosec.pub 10 points 2 weeks ago

The hacker known as 4 Chan is BACK, baby!

[–] Schwim@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Not dead. Just irrelevant.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

OK so Trump is going to have to choose whether or not to side with fucking 4chan, you know, the site with regular pedophilia threads.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 15 points 3 weeks ago

And how would Trump siding with nonces be a surprise?

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

It’s been a long time since I’ve browsed that cesspool, but I remember all the pedos getting banned and going over to the other image boards like 8chan. Been more than a decade though and that was when moot still ran things

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Man, either they strike a blow for online censorship or the UK laws do one decent thing and take out 4chan. Hilarious they're trying to invoke trump tho like, when has that ever worked, he doesnt care about his bootlicking supporters....

[–] Drewmeister@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

It wouldn't be the first time that he's done something because Barron says all of his supporters want him to.

load more comments
view more: next ›