this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2025
81 points (97.6% liked)

politics

22497 readers
3158 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A senior White House official has hinted at the possibility of the U.S. utilizing its gold reserves to acquire more Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC).

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NimdaQA@lemmy.world 61 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

Replacing the gold reserve with a bitcoin reserve? It is a pump and dump scheme the size of a nation.

[–] Goun@lemmy.ml 8 points 6 days ago

And not an average nation

[–] cerement@slrpnk.net 8 points 6 days ago

Caritas – “taking up 1/3 of all currency in circulation in Romania at its peak”

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 24 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

All part of the plan.

But, who possesses the gold if the transaction goes through?

The btc holders or the exchange or a bank or russia?

How does that transaction happen?

(PS: trump will finally know there is no gold in fort Knox when he steals it all)

[–] iceonfire1@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

It goes to whoever can provide Bitcoin. So, likely an exchange. Which ultimately gives the money to people selling Bitcoin. Many of whom are in North Korea and Russia.

Crypto investment is very risky. Too volatile. Too virtual. No protection against theft/fraud. Also a govt should really invest in companies in its own jurisdiction.

[–] NimdaQA@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (3 children)

or russia

Checking Sberbank rn

More seriously though, I am honestly not sure where the gold would end up at.

Probably the oligarchs who have a lot of crypto but want to exchange it for more tangible gold. Oh and people hoarding gold is a sign of a potential incoming economic collapse so.. not very good for America.

[–] curious_dolphin@slrpnk.net 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] NimdaQA@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago
[–] Goun@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 days ago

I'd suspect it's gonna be people close to T*ump

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 2 points 6 days ago

Gold has been going up for years, the wealthy everywhere are buying up gold because there's barely anything else left to buy.

[–] chase_what_matters@lemmy.world 17 points 6 days ago

Kleptocracy.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

I thought they were going to go and check Fort Knox and make sure all the gold was still there because they heard Biden stole it? 🤡

[–] NimdaQA@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago

They wanted to check how much gold was in there to steal.

[–] wildcardology@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

The last audit of fort knox was in the 70s. The US dollar is not backed by gold anymore. So I doubt the gold is still there.

[–] toy_boat_toy_boat@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

"paging mike judge.. paging mike judge.."

[–] Bernar_moustach@jlai.lu 2 points 6 days ago

That's some kind of reverse alchemy right there!