this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2025
149 points (99.3% liked)

Europe

7078 readers
799 users here now

News and information from Europe πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media. Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CAVOK@lemmy.world 53 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

IMHO every contract from any level in government should stipulate that data can't leave the EU without explicit consent. That would build up EU cloud providers since the big 3 would all be excluded.

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The US PATRIOT Act makes data storage location irrelevant. If the USA sanctions your country, the cloud gets turned off whether the data centre is local or not.

The USA is able to exercise soft power around the world because of and through its control of finance and now data.

[–] zaphod@sopuli.xyz 25 points 5 days ago

I think you missed OPs point. They shouldn't use data centres of US american companies even if they're located in the EU because they already can't guarantee that data isn't leaving the EU. CLOUD Act is more relevant here than the USA PATRIOT Act.

[–] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 9 points 5 days ago

data can’t leave the EU without explicit consent

This is already more or less the norm for many services, because of the GDPR and the ePrivacy directive, especially if you're handling special personal data categories, and/or the service is for a government entity. There's some caveats to this, but on a general level that's already how things are.

But as was pointed out, the problem isn't getting folks to host things in the EU since it's not like only European companies have data centers in the EU, but to use European cloud providers. Vendor lock-in is a real issue, however; no European provider can give you what AWS or GCP can, and migrating to something else might require a lot of work depending on which services you've been using.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 4 points 5 days ago (2 children)

microsoft alone has like 25 datacenters in the EU.

[–] Gloria@sh.itjust.works 22 points 5 days ago (1 children)

They do not mean anything if they are not GDPR Business compliant. They can not guarantee the inaccessability by us gov branches. The EU needs solutions independent off the haircolor of the next US President.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 1 points 5 days ago

i mean they're not allowed to do business here if they aren't. i'm not saying they are, but they put up a good enough faΓ§ade that governments trust them, and they haven't been caught yet.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

But they are a US company and US law can subpoena EU data without EU gov authorisation, so the fact their DC's are in the EU is basically irrelevant.

Should the EU use Russian or Chinese DC's based in the EU?

[–] lime@feddit.nu 1 points 5 days ago

it's required by law that they disclose that in their SLA, which means that when governments question it they at least say that they're making exceptions. apparently that's good enough, but it probably doesn't stand up to an independent audit.

[–] SpeedRunner@europe.pub 23 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] kubica@fedia.io 12 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Should Europe be prepared for the US not being as friendly as it was though?

[–] eee@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 5 days ago (1 children)

US already isn't friendly, or do you consider tariffs and bullying a friendly gesture?

[–] kubica@fedia.io 4 points 5 days ago

Maybe I was being gentle, but I also mean that it can still get worse.

In my country, both sides of the political aisle are banking HARD on the shift in US politics being a minor and temporary aberration and that it’s better to just keep things moving as smoothly as possible while Trump is pope/kaiser/button-haver. No way, will we see any moves towards less reliance on the US here.

A rare case of betteridge not applying

[–] Anonymaus@feddit.org 8 points 5 days ago

Its rhetorical question, right?

[–] hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 2 points 5 days ago

I certainly hope we go further than that and also cut down on Chinese solar inverters, dubious smarthome/cloud appliances... And I wish we don't buy too many US weapon systems now that we invest in war/defense, so Trump can't just blackmail us with the ammunitions supply.

[–] tal@lemmy.today -3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Should Europe wean itself off US tech?

Robin Berjon, a digital governance specialist, says Europe should take the risk of a US "kill switch" seriously

collapsed inline media

[–] BenchpressMuyDebil@szmer.info 8 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

we should improve society somewhat

It's likely a Dell 2725QE, I have the exact same one because it's (or "was" if something new came out) the only choice with the new generation of the IPS Black panel (that has 120FPS) and a USB hub. Samsung (that owns the technology) hasn't released anything yet when I was buying mine.