this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2025
300 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

74359 readers
2591 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 125 points 6 days ago (2 children)

It's my network. I control what does or does not go through it.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 40 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Hmm, I was fully expecting Ron Swanson there.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

LOL That is also appropriate but I meant the one where he chucks his computer in the garbage.

[–] Anti_Iridium@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Just because you didn't actually share it:

collapsed inline media

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 2 points 5 days ago

You are a better person than I.

[–] Fuck_u_spez_@sh.itjust.works 15 points 5 days ago

It has never even occurred to me that it might not be okay to block ads on connections or devices that I own -- or even those that I don't, for that matter.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 59 points 6 days ago

Still true a decade later.

[–] svcg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 53 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Isn’t ad blocking, as the industry magazine AdAge has called it, “robbery, plain and simple”?

Robbing corporations is based, though, actually.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 13 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Isn’t ad blocking, as the industry magazine AdAge has called it, “robbery, plain and simple”?

No. Find a way to make money that doesn't require showing ads online if you have a problem with it.

[–] smiletolerantly@awful.systems 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Yeah. I don't have a contract with the site, agreeing to pay them in any way, shape or form. They voluntarily show me their content, but that does not obligate me to also accept their ads.

[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 45 points 6 days ago

It's not like these ads have any respect.

[–] Glitch@lemmy.dbzer0.com 42 points 5 days ago

I think all ads should be blocked. If billions in funding is going to be put to use it should go towards offsetting environmental impact and developing products that are actually better, instead of just convincing people to settle for a cute jingle

[–] Lembot_0004@discuss.online 36 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The same reason why it is ok to not eat shit.

[–] smiletolerantly@awful.systems 1 points 4 days ago

Right? These companies act like they are selling food and we are stealing it.

In reality, they put a big "free beer" sign up, we go and happily accept the beer, and then they act outraged that we refuse when they try to piss in the mug after handing it to us.

[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Here's why it's okay to block ads in pretty simple terms:

Ads can contain ransomware; that is to say, a seemingly innocent ad can deliver a payload which will run on your computer, lock your files, and demand you pay hundreds or even thousands of dollars anonymously.

Now if you go to the website that served the ad and tell them, "I allowed ads on your site because I support your right to monetise your content, and now I have to pay hundreds or thousands of dollars, will you help me pay that" or "will you pay that for me since your site served the ransomware," you know what they will tell you, every single time, without fail? Whether they actually answer you, or more likely, just delete your email. They're telling you that it's your problem. That you should have secured your computer better.

So secure your computer better now. Block all the ads.

Getting a little more technical, use Firefox or a fork of it. Use Linux if you can. Use a Mac if you can't. If you really must use Windows, know how to secure it. I use Windows 11 at work, I'd never use it at home, but I had a talk with the IT guy, and he let me do a few things to it. I know more than he does, but he's the one with the job, so I told him what I'd do before I did it, I did exactly what I said I was going to do, nothing more nothing less, and I still think my home computer is more secure, but I'm a lot less worried about using the work machine. I think it's wild that so many companies just use Windows. I'm not trying to hate on Windows. It's good for gaming and it's accessible. I'd love to see more companies roll their own *nix or just use Macs (which run macOS which is UNIX certified).

[–] timroerstroem@feddit.dk 22 points 5 days ago

Here's why it's okay to block ads in even simpler terms: It's my fucking computer.

[–] TimewornTraveler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 5 days ago (2 children)

living adfree is so great. sometimes it's jarring to hear an ad in the wild, but it's a nice reminder of how much better I'm living

[–] Emerald@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I do not understand how anyone uses mobile apps with ads. thats just so dystopian to me

[–] Devmapall@lemmy.zip 5 points 5 days ago

I was watching some TV with friend. Show on prime and on Hulu.

Both had ads. Granted they were far less than actual television is but I do not miss ads at all. They really spoil the experience. Especially for a paid service.

[–] Teal@piefed.zip 26 points 5 days ago (1 children)

They’re unnecessary, distracting, some try to track you and others can have malware. No thanks.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

"some". more like 99.9999999% of them

[–] Teal@piefed.zip 2 points 4 days ago

Accurate. I was trying to leave room so not to say all of them but I see you left just enough and that works too. :)

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 17 points 5 days ago

Because even US secret services (multiple of them) say so.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 13 points 5 days ago

It's my computer isn't it? I can discard packets I don't care to receive

[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 12 points 5 days ago (3 children)

no ads in web 1.0 and the internet was perfectly fine

[–] lime@feddit.nu 21 points 5 days ago (2 children)

there were so many fucking ads online in the late 90s

and you couldn't block them because they were either served from the same domain or used the same plugin as the content and it was an all-or-nothing thing

all those goddamn blinking gifs with "click here" and "you're our millionth visitor", and the pop-ups, and the flash bars with "shoot the ducks"...

[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 11 points 5 days ago (1 children)

a lot of those came up in the late 90s early 2000s though. the early 90s were mostly just text based pages.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 9 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

yeah, but as soon as the web actually had enough traffic to take off the ads were everywhere. before 1996 it was basically just a prototype.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] lime@feddit.nu 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

considering that "web 2.0" is widely accepted to be "the social web", where the focus was on user contribution and interoperability... no.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

maybe i'm getting my html versions mixed up with my buzzwords

[–] lime@feddit.nu 2 points 4 days ago

yeah i think that's about the same time. there are so many versions at the same time that it gets confusing

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 4 points 5 days ago

That's before it got colonized by megacorporations.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 10 points 5 days ago

It would be much harder to block ads if they were more like newspapers and just a part of the page you were viewing, instead of imported from a different source.

But in order to do that the site themselves would be responsible for the ads they display instead of blaming their ad service, and they would lose out on all their tracking data.

So fuck em.

[–] xep@discuss.online 9 points 5 days ago

"It's my ccomputer" has already been mentioned, but it's my bandwidth and my home network too. Ads can stay off it.

[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Advertising needs to become as socially acceptable as smoking.

It arbitrary pollutes any environment it’s conducted in, and causes secondary harms to non-participants by incentivising insecure hoarding of private information with the intent to better target individuals.

[–] olympicyes@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

I’d personally start with billboards but instead now the billboards are screens too, not adjusted for night time to avoid distracting or blinding drivers and zero consideration for neighbors that have their backyards illuminated.

[–] T156@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Maladvertising and scams just make that a surefire thing, especially since there's a chance that just loading an ad could infect your machine.

And for less tech-savvy family members, it cuts down on the risk of them falling for scams or suchlike.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 days ago

Ad-blocking is as legal as a lock on the door.

[–] Auth@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I used ad blocker but I cannot imagine a world without ads. What does discoverablity look like in a world without ads?

I think ads have the same issue as content recommendation algo, that being that they're bad but useful.

[–] glog78@digitalcourage.social 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

@Auth @floofloof
IMHO: Advertisment is another word for recommendation. While advertisment is seen as bad a recomendation isn't.

So what advertisment never made happen is making themself usefull to the consumer. Most consumer want maybe a !!! usefull recommendation !!! but not someone trying to force you to buy a certain product.

So what was the time before ads ... it never existet ... even before tv radio had advertisment. Even back in this day people hated the advertisment and did music recordings cutting the advertisment and talking out.

Some old people might remember press record ... press stop ... rewind a little bit ... and all of this.

The alternative was to pay alot of money for music ...

[–] xep@discuss.online 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Word of mouth existed long before advertising, and as for algorithmic discoverability retailers do a fine job of that already.

[–] Auth@lemmy.world 0 points 5 days ago

Ads try to make useful recommendations thats why google puts so much effort into trying to figure out who you are. Companies today can suggest their products to exactly who they think would most want them. But this comes with the downsides of user privacy.

If we had no ads then companies would pretend to be real people and make product suggestions. We can never escape it.