Would be crazy if Dems made this the central plank of their agenda, rather than Crime Wave hysterics and AI "Abundance"
this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2025
224 points (97.9% liked)
politics
25197 readers
2856 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
The "abundance" bullshit seems to have failed, which I'm very grateful for. I'm glad I'm not the only one who heard Ezra Klein attempt to explain it and thought it was a load of shit. It's literally just deregulation. Fuck off with that shit.
Sounds like a good idea but this seems to be mostly focusing on problems of the future. Maybe preventing new ways to rob customers but not really doing anything for current practices.
There are already stores trying to pin prices on retail items according to what they think the customer will buy. This isn't widespread in use yet, but it's not the distant future. It's right now.
It's not really good news though, is it? The majority won't even bring it to a vote and it'll die in committee. Republicans (most, but not all) are a cancer in Congress and we need some serious white blood cells.
Depends on how you sell it maybe. Tell people they want to use personal data that include networth or income to dictate food prices and you might get Republican support
This isn't a good news community; it's a politics community.
Anyway, while I agree that Republicans are unlikely to advance it because it would help people and that's a bad thing according to Republican politics, your absolute doomerism is also unhelpful.
Who said this is doomerism? I'm calling for real change.
I don't know the specifics of her bill but if it it involves price fixing, history has shown that only leads to shortages.
They should also pass a bill to exempt imported food and food manufacturers from tariffs. It's one thing to say we need to incur higher prices to encourage American investment but leave the fucking food supply out of it.
The US also needs to fix its corn subsidy problem. So many farmers grow exclusively corn because the subsidies just make it impossible not to, and most of that just gets turned into ethanol.
If the government were to cut off corn subsidies, or just start subsidizing better food options, a lot of the food scarcity and price problems faced by Americans could be solved.
But that would make gas more expensive, so obviously that takes priority...
While only ~10% of corn is human food (including corn syrup), the rest is about evenly split between ethanol production and animal feed (~45% each). https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/crops/corn-and-other-feed-grains/feed-grains-sector-at-a-glance
I mean, ethanol for fuel isn't great, and it represents most of the new corn consumption over the last 20 years, but an enormous amount of US corn goes to pigs and cattle.
We need to just ban the use of facial recognition for all businesses by default, except where opted in.
We need broader protection
We need to just ban the use of facial recognition for all businesses by default, ~~except where opted in.~~
FTFY. Some shit is too heinous to even allow people to opt into. It's the same reason we don't allow people to sell themselves into slavery, even if they "consent."
That goes double in an environment of corporatism, where antitrust law is hardly ever enforced and extreme differences in bargaining power between businesses and individuals are the norm.
You just pissed off 90% of people with smartphones
Too late, I’m shopping at Aldi forever. I’m happy for the people who don’t have an Aldi near them, though.
Go ahead and just set prices for all goods and services, then shift manufacturing to what you expect we'll need for the next 5 years.
GOT EM
Username checks out?
Oh no, I was being facetious.
“personalized price gouging” where stores use consumers’ sensitive personal information against them to raise prices.
Can someone explain this? I pay the price that's written on the shelf.
Probably in online ordering. There are companies that have used your zip code to raise prices, and it's been rumored that individualized prices that go into your known profile to raise them have existed.