this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2025
245 points (96.2% liked)

Political Memes

9169 readers
2989 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 48 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I like the historically accurate implication that the MLs set the anarchists on fire.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Sets the Anarchists on fire

How could the liberals do this?!?

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 day ago

Kills forms of leftisim that don't agree with them

We're the only kind of Marxism that ever succeeded!!!

[–] atopi@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Dont they consider them liberals? They would be saying it infighting between the fascists

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Do ML’s consider anarchists to be liberals? I’d imagine some of them do, probably. I think it’d depend on who you ask

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I get called a lib all the time because I’ve got a problem with secret police and purges

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yeah I’ve caught the same accusation before for more or less the same

[–] atopi@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Its an exaggeration

There have been comments from hexbear/lemmygrad/lemmy.ml users that say that though

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Oh yeah, over there they’re definitely in the “everyone I disagree with is a shitlib” boat

[–] tenchiken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I appreciate that the anarchists are canonically the fire. Warms my little heart.

[–] FuckFascism@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

I'm happy that they caught the Marxists on fire.

Same. I feel seen.

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 days ago

I misread it as “national socialist” and wondered where the hell you found nazis. I actively search for them and I’ve only found like 10 in two years.

Feels like maybe you were expecting argument, but we're all pleased

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

Mod coming online after working all day / sleeping all night:

https://youtu.be/o3vcxuJV5xg#t=3m30s

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We need to pursue a society in which everyone has equal access to rights and resources, where no one has to worry about food or shelter from the elements, or whether their family will be ripped away from them due to circumstances. Where no-one is given exception, even when they are deeply in debt or committed heinous crimes, or are the most deviant of sexual perverts. We can include them and address the issues as well.

A society in which everyone has exactly the same amount of political power may not be possible but we can get closer to this than we are now. This is what that more perfect union bit is about.

We need to less follow ideologies which operate more like divine command theory as dicta or creeds, and more see societal models as exactly that: models. We know democracy on its own needs to be fine tuned. We know capitalism works only when well regulated and upper management isn't allowed to behave irresponsibly. We know command economics requires a lot of deliberation and the willingness to listen to and address gripes from the public. The end goal is still the same: Everyone eats. Everyone is warm. Everyone is welcome.

This is my mission statement.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's a long process, especially since people who have a lot of power really, really, really want to keep it.

For now the process is getting people on the same page. Or as a certain poet put it:

You may say I'm a dreamer
But I'm not the only one
I hope some day you'll join us
And the world will be one

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I wouldn’t hold my breath.

For example, I already don’t like you for quoting Jon Lennon

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 20 hours ago

I wouldn't hold my breath either.

Human society continues to careen towards multiple great filters it is ill-prepared to navigate, and the trillion-dollar propaganda machine that got Trump elected works. We just may not be evolved to cooperate at the level that gets us to community-based governments without monied interests interfering.

Mark Twain invested his money into the Paige Compositor, an automated mechanical typesetter, which had over a thousand moving parts in an era that lacked the capacity for precision molding. Babbage constructed the difference engine 2 which worked like a charm when built by students a century later, but he was defunded at the wrong time.

Sometimes we're just not ready for good ideas, and not capable of implementing them at the time they are discovered.

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Change is hard, change is ugly, change is necessary.

[–] Allonzee@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

that one liberal

As a democratic socialist I think I am more annoyed by neolibs than the Fascists. I wish the Fascists were gone more, but the neolibs found a way to be more insufferable.

Fascists largely seem to know they're selfish, hateful pricks and take a perverse pride in it. Note the shit eating grins and lazy circular arguments meant to provoke more than defend.

Liberals want to have their cake and eat it too. They have no problem with mass homelessness so long as it's not in their backyard, and they like record profits even when it involves legal murder of customers, but they blow a microchip when informed that means they work against society and are also selfish fucks who want there to be winners and losers instead of everyone having full bellies. You cant be for mass homelessness, for basic needs not being met by some while others have too much and be a decent person.

At least the Devil is the Devil and not perpetually trying to find the new middle ground of greed and power and asking to be called a good boy or girl for it. I prefer sociopaths that announce themselves.

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 1 points 2 days ago

Source of your exasperation please?

[–] SassyRamen@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago

Grass as in the grassy Knoll?