this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2025
808 points (97.2% liked)

People Twitter

7992 readers
577 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] candyman337@lemmy.world 398 points 1 week ago (24 children)

A company being able to deactivate your purchased property is absolutely dystopian

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 65 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Not absolutely, because a company being able to deactivate your purchased property for ulterior reasons is more dystopian.

I also suspect the rapper wasn't exactly praising the cybertruck, so that would add "for ~~insulting~~ misrepresenting? a company". That's even more dystopian.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 39 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You don't have to suspect anything, watch the video. He's hyping the Cybertruck, hyping, "I'm RICH BEEYOTCH!" This is Tesla trying to distance themselves from that message.

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

While that song and message are shit, so is Tesla.

This is peak face eating leopards content all around.

Also I wonder if a white rapper singing the same song would have had his shit-pyramid disabled as fast.

Tesla factories have had a racism problem for years.

[–] Test_Tickles@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I have have had it up to here with people calling Elon a racist Nazi with a mangled penis.

load more comments (23 replies)
[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 185 points 1 week ago

"Free speech absolutist"

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 127 points 1 week ago (4 children)

So stupid. So petty. Elon needs to grow the fuck up.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago
[–] kautau@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Also Dinna Eskin, Esq. (wanted to make sure I included the title so I don’t get sued) and all the other soulless people blindly following orders to take home that paycheck and cash in on that stock

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] 30p87@feddit.org 17 points 1 week ago
[–] msage@programming.dev 17 points 1 week ago

We need to make sure that people can't have this kind of power.

He is a symptom of the real problem.

[–] qevlarr@lemmy.world 122 points 1 week ago (15 children)

Clippy moment 📎💬

Unacceptable. It should be illegal to even build the capability to brick someone else's property

[–] turtlesareneat@discuss.online 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is a major feature of nearly all cars now. Dealerships can remotely track and disable cars when people fall behind on their payments. That's because so many people fall behind on payments nowadays, they need easy mechanisms for dealing with it. America is cooked.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 75 points 1 week ago (4 children)

This is a good case to battle the shit out of Tesla in court and set a landmark verdict on the "you buy but don't own" abuse.

Usually this would however require that courts are capable of reaching proper verdicts, that the government actually cared about the people, that consumer protection agencies had any footing etc. Alas, all of them are infiltrated by the big capital corporations.

[–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Also, how is it protected from a song? Satire and parody are fair game.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 68 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Imagine:

You have parking lots full of your cars that can't sell because your CEO is basically in the top 5 of horrible humans.

You have horror stories about kids burning alive in the cars because they couldn't open the doors.

You have a Rapper, with social following, in Detroit, Motor City, with a 100k model of your car who makes a song about how you're fucking up, and you shut down his 100k car and send a c&d.

Could you imagine a PR department being this bad at its job?

He could make a music video burning the thing to the ground and make his money back.

[–] glitch1985@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I thought Tesla fired their PR department?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 60 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This is what happens when you buy a car from a tech company. There is no reason that a Ts&Cs should ever come with a car - but here we are. For now, avoid any company that does things like this. Top of mind are Tesla and BMW

[–] j4k3@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

Calling it buying is the problem. It is proprietary internet connected garbage. It is a rental you paid buyer money for. No one owns a Tesla. No Tesla is for sale, and neither is any car that runs proprietary internet connect software. Someone else ultimately controls it. That person is the real owner. Primitive idiots struggle to understand this exceptionally simple concept. Terms and conditions are you selling your rights as a citizen willing to become a slave to someone else. It isn't normal. It exists because people are not smart enough to say no and stand up for themselves. I don't rent one of these shit cars, or watch TV with terms and conditions, or run shitty operating systems, or stalkerware whore myself to bezos' camera on the front of my home as a doorbell. None of this is actually normal. It's fools selling their rights as citizens in a democracy for peanuts and IOUs.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Similarly, if you piss off Ferrari, they’ll ban you from buying another.

[–] Damage@feddit.it 19 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Yeah but they won't take away the one you have

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Honytawk@feddit.nl 58 points 1 week ago

Mr "freedom of speech absolutionist" hard at work I see

[–] abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone 49 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Hey maybe we shouldn't have a world where car companies can remotely deactivate your vehicle if you say mean things about them?

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

If car companies can't remotely deactivate your vehicle, how will they be able to extort you and harass you and sell you out to the police?

[–] JeSuisUnHombre@lemmy.zip 42 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Just looked up the lyrics and it's just Huey saying he drives a cybertruck because he's got money. I bet the only reason Musk hates it is because he's a racist shitbag

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Fleur_@aussie.zone 34 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Whoever told you that is your enemy

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] markstos@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Verge reported there are signs the video may be fix and Tesla posted to confirm that it was indeed fake.

https://www.theverge.com/tesla/757594/tesla-cybertruck-deactivated-viral-video-fake

Tesla's reply: "This is fake – that’s not our screen. Tesla does NOT disable vehicles remotely."

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 week ago

They do though, so thats a total lie. Try getting into your car that you paid for firmware, see if tesla locks you down.

I'll note none of my old cars have this problem. Don't buy new cars people.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] bassomitron@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Assuming this is real, I don't see how this is legal? There's no way Tesla would win in court under any sane judge. If they bought the car outright and fully own it (i.e. didn't lease it from Tesla), then that is the car owner's property. The manufacturer can't, effectively, sabotage your property without consequence. I truly hope this is not real, and if it is, they bring this to court ASAP and get precedent to squash this type of insanity right off the bat. If Tesla gets away with this bullshit--again, if it's real--then other companies will very likely begin following suit.

[–] BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Assuming this is real, I don't see how this is legal? There's no way Tesla would win in court under any sane judge. If they bought the car outright and fully own it (i.e. didn't lease it from Tesla), then that is the car owner's property.

I'm fairly certain that it won't go before a judge. If Tesla doesn't have a forced arbitration clause https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arbitration_clause in their contracts I would be truly surprised.

The manufacturer can't, effectively, sabotage your property without consequence.

I don't own a Tesla and dont have access to a US contract, but it wouldnt be far fetched that there's something in there about Tesla reserving the right to use a kill switch at their discretion.

I truly hope this is not real,

You and me both. But we live in a stupid timeline, and I can no longer tell what's outrageously real and what's rage bait.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I don't own a Tesla and dont have access to a US contract, but it wouldnt be far fetched that there's something in there about Tesla reserving the right to use a kill switch at their discretion.

In any sane country, one of the hundreds of consumer protection laws would have a judge laugh as they threw it out.

[–] JeSuisUnHombre@lemmy.zip 19 points 1 week ago

any sane country

USA has left the chat

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Anyone who buys a fucking motor vehicle that comes with Terms and Conditions agreement, let alone one that can be spontaneously and remotely turned off... you're a fucking moron. And Tesla needs to be sued into oblivion. That shit should NOT be legal.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] BagOfHeavyStones@piefed.social 21 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Time for a sequel to "United Breaks Guitars."

"Tesla bricked me truuuk."

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 week ago (3 children)

LOL registered previously in your name OR in your possession....

So Tesla doesn't even give a shit if the guy still owns the vehicle, they deactivated it because he owned it at one point in time.

He could have sold it to some poor fuck who now has a bricked Cyber truck and Tesla don't give a fuck.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] jaschen306@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 week ago (15 children)

For those who don't know, this shit is protected by the freedom of speech

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 64 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not quite, Tesla is not a part of the government.

... yet.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 26 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Yes, but they can retaliate with petty shit in this way. All freedom of speech means is that there are no criminal charges against him for doing this - the government isn't coming after him.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Free speech protects you from the government oppressing your speech, not a private corporation.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] mikezeman@lemmy.zip 19 points 1 week ago

Just wanted to say, huge props for editing the post and title when you found out it was debunked. That's so important and too many people just don't take that step when they learn, so upvoted for that

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

seems like this should go to court - make tesla prove these claims, and explain how they're allowed to stifle both free speech and parody.

because this is absolute bullshit

[–] Cocopanda@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

I don’t feel bad for losers that bought Nazi cars and trucks. You should have known better. And people expect these people to go to space and not randomly kill people?

load more comments
view more: next ›