this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2025
195 points (99.0% liked)

politics

22605 readers
4971 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Trump allies are urging the White House to curb Elon Musk's media presence after his controversial remarks on Social Security.

Musk called it “the biggest Ponzi scheme” and suggested eliminating entitlement spending, conflicting with Trump’s vow to preserve benefits.

Musk’s cost-cutting measures have led to Social Security office closures and reduced phone services, sparking backlash from both parties.

Critics warn Musk’s comments could jeopardize Trump’s 2026 campaign, while Democrats capitalize on the issue. The White House continues to insist Musk’s views do not reflect Trump’s policy.

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dhork@lemmy.world 70 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The White House continues to insist Musk’s views do not reflect Trump’s policy.

Doesn't that make Musk a domestic terrorist who needs to have his citizenship revoked and be sent to an El Salvadorian prison? At least, That's the Administration position when someone who is not a jizzilionaire expresses views that do not reflect Trump's policies....

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I truly hope we strap him to a SpaceX rocket and launch him to the sun.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It would be super difficult to launch him into the sun. Believe it or not, the deltav is much higher to go towards the sun than away from it. Might as well just launch him into space with no destination.

[–] Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

There was a comment that put it into a very easy to understand comparison. Now I have to find it.

Well, shoot. I can't remember the community it was in. The commenter related trying to get to the sun like trying to get to the center of the spinning fair ride that pins you to the wall with spinning forces.

[–] rbos@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The math is pretty simple. We're travelling at 25km/sec around the sun. You have to get that to zero to hit the sun. Getting to Jupiter means getting up to like 37km/sec (made up number). Way easier.

edit: I looked it up because it didn't feel right. Outer planets move SLOWER the farther out you go because gravity is weaker and they don't need as much angular momentum. So the math isn't quite as simple as that. :)

[–] Shiggles@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

Nah, he wouldn’t experience most of that. Give him a suit, set him loose in space three days out on a collision course with his tesla.

[–] NimdaQA@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

One of the biggest problems with this is trying to get the SpaceX rocket into space considering that the rockets prefer to explode.

[–] Mr_Canard@jlai.lu 2 points 1 week ago

That's a risk I'm willing to take

[–] Tm12@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

Didn’t know jizzilionaire was a term, but it describes fElon more aptly than anything else.

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 29 points 1 week ago (2 children)

They're not upset he's doing it. They're upset he's talking about doing it.

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 8 points 1 week ago

The biggest threat the republicans have... is putting what they stand for out front and center. That's why their typical strategy is to focus on nothingburgers that have almost no impact like, dealing with the trans athletes. or wholey fictional ideas like schools putting in litterboxes for furries.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Someone with no filter will always say the 'don't say that aloud' part aloud

[–] TomMasz@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago

Just because he says a lot of stupid shit that his followers accept as truth doesn't mean he should be restricted from saying that stupid shit. Every time he opens his mouth more people wake up to the realization of how dangerous he is. It's a public service if you think about it.

[–] 60d@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

"Social security is the biggest Ponzi scheme of all time.” --The Living Embodiment of a Ponzi Scheme

This "man" did nothing besides get lucky with being born wealthy. People invest in his stupid shit, inflating the value of his companies, and these companies don't actually make a profit. New investors are required to fund him constantly, or the companies would crash and burn. Without government contracts and welfare, he would already be a pauper, given his lifestyle.

[–] pleasegoaway@lemm.ee 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

In other words, “we need him to stop saying the quiet part out loud!”

[–] Frozengyro@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Yea, that's Trump's job

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The Democratic firm Blueprint tested 20 different political messages about Musk, and the four that were most “concerning” to registered voters were all about Social Security. The top two were about Musk’s proposals to fire Social Security Administration employees and dismantle phone services. By contrast, voters said the messages least concerning to them were about his personal life, such as Musk fathering children with five different women. The survey was conducted last week and released Thursday.

These are the same people who wanted Bill Clinton's head on a pike for getting a blowjob from an intern.


Trump’s 2026 campaign

Unrelated, summary is bad, this is bad wording and it isn't anywhere in the article. Trump doesn't run in 2026, it's the elections for House and Senate.

This is the only thing close to that in the article:

“The more of these Musk interviews, the more discussion we’ll have. I think the entire 2026 campaign will be a referendum on Musk” if the billionaire’s poll numbers continue to drop, this person added. “You will see ad after ad with the chainsaw.”

Don't use AI to write your summaries please and thank you, mmmkay.

[–] Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

I don't understand, you mean Elmo isn't president?

No no - keep going. Give him the leash. I want to see where this goes. You shit your bed; now lie in it.

[–] venotic@kbin.melroy.org 6 points 1 week ago

No, let him keep running his big mouth. If there's anything to gain from the marching of everyone's livelihoods stomped on, is at least we'll get the entertainment of this incompetent sycophant running his mouth and pissing people on all sides off.

[–] capt_wolf@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

If there's anything good to be seen in what's going on right now it's that Trump, Musk, and the rest of the regime can't help but shout the quiet part from rooftops. Let Musk go on... Eventually, even the hardcore Republicans are going to get sick of this travesty. Hopefully anyway...