this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2025
272 points (100.0% liked)

politics

25566 readers
2478 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Redistricting ahead of the 2026 midterms is at the center of the political universe this week, and Vice President JD Vance’s visit to Indiana on Thursday is a big signal the White House isn’t backing off the strategy anytime soon. Vance’s visit to a state to ask lawmakers to redistrict is a significant escalation from the White House, which was pressuring Texas Republicans behind closed doors to redraw the state’s congressional map.

Archive article: https://archive.is/FPwRH#selection-745.0-753.205

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 40 points 1 month ago (2 children)

They've played that hand already. They've been abusing redistricting for decades. It's the only reason they've been able to gain or maintain power for decades.

If the dems can muster the cojones to fight fire with fire this will backfire spectacularly on the republicans.

[–] Xanthobilly@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That rigged rubber stamp loses legitimacy by the day.

They're about 3 more obscene decisions like Roe away from states openly rebelling against them.

[–] not_that_guy05@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Roe could have been codified by the Dems, but eh just another talking point.

[–] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Indeed. And that's a failure they should never stop answering for.

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And it's worked so they will rely on it even more to prevent any loss of control in 2026.

[–] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What I mean to say is that its a dead end. It's played out. No more rope. No more toothpaste to squeeze. If they went hog wild they might get 15 seats. Which would immediately be wiped out by the dems. IF they want to stop it. Which is never a sure thing. The dems often have just enough turncoats on hand to fuck up an iron wedge while the party leadership stands around, cock in hand, going /shrug "well we tried".

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

How did you possibly come to such a confident conclusion there is no value in further gerrymandering? Cleary they see value or they wouldn't be trying to get it done before 2026.

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 32 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

America is fucked forever without revolutionary action, but no one there is going to bother.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 41 points 1 month ago (1 children)

America is fucked forever without revolutionary action, but no one there is going to bother.

It's so easy to tell people to risk their lives from afar. Protest works better.

We're just so fucking tired, we thought we got rid of him.

[–] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 16 points 1 month ago

As far as I know there’s no legitimate group trying to organize, and if there were they’d get shut down by the FBI well before they could do anything truly revolutionary. All the ‘militia’ groups are right-wing white nationalist fuckwads and their man is in power currently, so…

[–] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

there’s the targeted message of the month!

“Start a Civil War. Commit violence. Otherwise you’re worthless.”

The result would be very valuable to America’s geopolitical opponents.

[–] N0t_5ure@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (2 children)

He makes no mention of violence, and violence isn't necessary, just a response in kind by blue states. FWIW, we're already in a "cold" civil war, and violence is likely to ramp up over time, as happened in Ireland with The Troubles.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

We’ve been in a cold civil war since at least the passage of the civil rights act

[–] Xaphanos@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I hadn't thought of it that way. Interesting.

[–] 4grams@awful.systems 2 points 1 month ago

America is fucked forever

Fixed that for you.

[–] BetaBlake@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

It's what they've been doing for decades, Dems would benefit much more at this point by doing the same thing and they fucking better, if they don't the country is cooked, because Republicans are going to continue to steal as many elections as possible.

[–] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

Release the Epstein files

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

Where do we draw the line?