this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2025
116 points (96.8% liked)

politics

25150 readers
1988 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 92 points 4 days ago (1 children)

She literally raped kids with Epstein and wasn't concerned about that either...

I don't give a fuck where a child rapist draws the line for "concerning" behavior

[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 36 points 4 days ago

Oh yeah. I post this story as more of the advancement of the cover up rather than to take her at face value

[–] vegeta@lemmy.world 72 points 4 days ago

She doesn't think she did anything concerning with epstein either.

[–] runiq@feddit.org 60 points 4 days ago (1 children)

And there it is. The fix is in.

[–] crandlecan@mander.xyz 21 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Baby Jesus sure works in mysterious ways 🙏💕

[–] shittydwarf@sh.itjust.works 10 points 4 days ago

Blesseded are the peedos

[–] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 38 points 4 days ago

Trump's arm is so far up her ass I'm surprised she didn't start blaming Obama.

[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 37 points 4 days ago

She wasn’t “concerned” with grooming and raping children herself or helping Epstein do it, so what she defines as “concerning” is unlikely to be the same as yours or mine.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 32 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Anyone wonder why Trump employed underage masseuses?

[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 18 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] MrVilliam@sh.itjust.works 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Enigmas never age, have you noticed that?

[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

Just like every day is another wonderful secret.

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 23 points 3 days ago

Isn't this the same thing as asking a murder if they did anything wrong? Why the fuck is her statements even valid after the private DOJ meeting.

[–] Mjpasta710@midwest.social 14 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

The woman who has been convicted and has actually been tried for actual perjury is a reliable source. /s

[–] barnaclebutt@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago

Did she read it from a cue card handed to her from Blanche?

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] crandlecan@mander.xyz 2 points 3 days ago

Trust me bro 👍

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

Oh, it looks like nothing happened after all guys. Put away the pitch forks because she just said they never did anything concerning.

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Pinocchio’s nose is a mile long now.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

A woman who has perjured herself before to escape legal consequences for heinous crimes, who has no remorse for the systematic trafficking and rape of young women, teenagers and children as young as 11 that she helped perpetrate, who faces decades in prison for her crimes (likely the rest of her life), who met in a private session with a lawyer with absolutely no independent corroborating witness to verify ANYTHING said or any deals made, that lawyer representing a man who is heavily and publically implicated in her crimes and who has the sole power to issue an immediate, unquestionable pardon for all of her crimes if she does what he wants to help make all of this go away.... says Trump is innocent. Welp, I'm sold. Nothing shady here.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I'm sure it's impossible that a rapist pedo would lie, right?

[–] TwinTitans@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

Ahh. Yeah the rapist knows what’s concerning and isn’t.

Ffs 🤦🏻‍♂️

[–] Auk@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago