this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2025
433 points (98.9% liked)

News

31378 readers
2369 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bacon_pdp@lemmy.world 121 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Applied retroactively and recursively, it would strip citizenship from effectively all Americans

[–] 4grams@awful.systems 99 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That’s the point. They have a weapon that can be used against anyone, and it’s already shown they don’t care about due process. The courts gave him everything he needs.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I think this is a great point. If they dispute the immigration status of your great grandpappy, oh looks like you're an illegal based on this purely unconstitutional "inherited status" doctrine.

Edit: The 14th amendment specifically mentions "born" in the US to prevent the use of the law to do things like this aimed at former slaves. Its no surprise that this kind of thing is being attempted by maga nazis.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's going to suck to have to carry in depth genealogical records everywhere

[–] Assassassin@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

I mean, you could carry the 2nd to defend the 14th

[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago

My dirt farmer ancestors got here in like 1890, too late to fight against the Yahnkeez, just in time to steal land from the Indians.

So I guess I'm either Scottish or stateless now. I'm not sure which is worse. (Just kidding, Scots)

[–] gidostro@lemmy.cafe 77 points 2 days ago

I cannot fucking wait for a bunch of white bitches to be all “why my baby not American, I vote for you!”

FAFO

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 60 points 2 days ago (4 children)

How will this impact the people in the Epstein Files?

[–] 60d@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Donald J Trump
All Republicans
Half of Democrats

Wow. I Didn't Know That. You're Telling Me Now for the First Time

[–] aceshigh@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

That is a great question. Thanks for bringing it up.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SheeEttin@lemmy.zip 49 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Or Trump's wife who he bought from Epstein?

[–] Aggravationstation@feddit.uk 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Wouldn't this mean that Trump's father who's parents were German and his mother who was born in Scotland weren't citizens when he was born on American soil, hence he himself isn't?

[–] axx@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 day ago

Of course they will never let it apply to themselves.

Fascist regimes delight in and depend on arbitrary enforcement of rules.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 47 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No it ain't, experts have been telling us the whole time that no one is safe.

First they came for the Mexicans, I just cracked open a bud light...

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 41 points 2 days ago (5 children)

So, recursively and retroactively. So who is a citizen then? People who pay the $5m? People who are naturalized? Party loyalists? Does servitude guarantee citizenship? I would like to know more.

[–] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The more of these boxes you can check, the “safer” you are….

White.
Wealthy.
Straight.
Male.
Christian.

[–] SheeEttin@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 days ago

And well-connected and have rightthink. Those are more important than the others. You can check all your boxes, but too much wrongthink and you'll be against the wall before you know what's happening.

[–] Alaik@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

Party > Wealth > orientation > race/gender > religion (Just keep it quiet.)

[–] Stamau123@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

service hasn't guaranteed citizenship since Trump scrapped the program in his first term

[–] ThatGuy46475@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

Not even service guarantees citizenship as multiple veterans have been deported

[–] wabafee@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It's not a nation anymore it is more a club. Do they have membership discounts? /s

[–] 60d@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago

I'm doing my part!

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 34 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Fucking fascists. We should still be accepting immigrants through Ellis Island (in my humble opinion)

[–] 7toed@midwest.social 3 points 2 days ago

No! Don't be humble about that, that's just simply how this country was founded.. and I don't mean the exploiters, I mean the countless immigrants who form the working class since then. That is more than something to take pride in.

I had a little "debate" where it was being argued the US was never a melting pot, and if it was ever, it isn't anymore. How defeatist is that? To let the undeniable presence of so many cultures wither just as these ethnonationalists intend.. You have to be bold, else you lose what you once had, or worse, never achieve anything greater.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 29 points 2 days ago (1 children)

To that end, USCIS declared flatly that the children of immigrants who are “unlawfully present” will “no longer be U.S. citizens at birth.” They will, instead, inherit the status of their parents, rendering them detainable and deportable as infants and throughout their lives. There is no indication that the government will provide some grace period before snatching up and imprisoning this new underclass of noncitizen babies; they are apparently subject to arrest from the moment of birth.

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 31 points 2 days ago (1 children)

it’s not much of a stretch to assume they’ll do the same to people born here three generations down. or six. or twenty.

fucking pieces of garbage worthless nazis these admins and anyone who supports them are.

[–] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Yeah that's smart, expel themselves

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

if we’re lucky they’ll follow their leader.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If you haven't figured out that these rules were never meant to apply to them, then I'm not sure what to say.

[–] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

20 generations would stretch back to Columbus

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago

Cool story.

[–] uhmbah@lemmy.ca 20 points 2 days ago

@xylol Is one of those who brought it up.

One of the steps that will lead to mass corporate slavery.

"Former" Americans will be bought and sold, or "disposed of", to pay off their "debt" for being allowed to stay on American soil.

[–] Cocopanda@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

So. This is what will cause a revolution. Believe that.

[–] NottaLottaOcelot@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 days ago

Will anything cause a revolution?

From an outside-the-US perspective, it feels as though every incremental assault the USA’s constitution is met with a bit of tut-tutting and complaining about why elected members don’t fix things, then back to apathy 48 hours later.

[–] theluckyone@discuss.online 4 points 2 days ago

If this goes through and birthright citizenship falls, so does the rest of the Constitution.

[–] npdean@lemmy.today 1 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Isn't birthright citizenship a human right or UN right or something?

[–] umt@lemmynsfw.com 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

No.

To render someone stateless is a HR violation (UDHR article 15), but there are plenty of countries that do not grant citizenship simply because a person is born within their borders (eg most of Europe).

But birthright citizenship is Good, imo.

[–] npdean@lemmy.today 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It is pretty much the peak human rights, to not let a human become a refugee at birth.

[–] umt@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 2 days ago

-:vibe replying:-

[–] koetje78@feddit.nl 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The world is pretty divided in giving citizenship based on the person's parents or on place of birth: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jus_sanguinis

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And you think trump cares?

[–] npdean@lemmy.today 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don’t. But it might be extremely difficult to approve.

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago

All he needs is the Supreme Court to agree. My guess is that they won't, but they are out of their fucking minds, so we really have no idea, it's a giant coin flip. The majority of those judges are horribly corrupt and basically terrible human beings, but if they destroy the country badly enough, they know it will come back to burn them. The question is how much risk they're willing to take.

load more comments
view more: next ›