this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2025
111 points (99.1% liked)

World News

48848 readers
1671 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Parents in China are being offered 3,600 yuan (£375; $500) a year for each of their children under the age of three in the government's first nationwide subsidy aimed at boosting birth rates.

The country's birth rate has been falling, even after the ruling Communist Party abolished its controversial one-child policy almost a decade ago.

all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 31 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Make it per month and until the kid is 18 years old, not 3 years, and many will jump at the opportunity. And that would be a lot closer to the real cost of raising a child. The red pill crowd even seems to assume women would see that as a whole career. Oh, the government can't afford that? Then I guess having many children is not economically viable and population shrinking is the only way to go.

[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Germany does about half of that (255€ per month and child until 25 or until the child finishes their education) and still birth rates are in the gutter

[–] Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The cost of living is much higher in Germany and even "half of" enough would still be considerably less than enough.

[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 4 days ago

Yes, it's about two- to three times as high. I realized I messed up in my original comment, tho:

255€ a month, vs 500ish$ a year. That's several times more (and still not enough), and it lasts until the child is grown up, not just three years. This will not have an impact on China's population crisis

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 26 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I am once again asking countries with low birthrates to increase immigration.

[–] Rozz@lemmy.sdf.org 22 points 5 days ago (1 children)

But what about the racism?

[–] Eril@feddit.org 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Racists can go to Russia. I heard they have a lot of space in their country.

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 3 points 4 days ago

And, oddly enough, racists moving there dont seem to take up any space.

[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 24 points 5 days ago (1 children)

This need a picture of great wall with transparent xi floating head and a quote that say "git fucking"

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 15 points 5 days ago (1 children)

That doesn't even cover a month of childcare

[–] Peck@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

In US I assume. How much does childcare cost in China?

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] Peck@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

This article talks about cost "relative to its GDP per capita." In the proposal they give flat sum of money. So we are comparing Apple to oranges. Not saying you're wrong, but I still would like to know how much is daycare per month in China. I know in us I pay 2k per month. I doubt it's the same there.

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Women generally see a reduction of 2,106 working hours when looking after children aged 0-4 and face an estimated wage loss of 63,000 yuan ($8,700) in the period, the report said, using an hourly wage gauge of 30 yuan per hour. Having a child will also lead to a 12-17% drop in women's wages, the report said.Leisure time will be reduced by 12.6 hours for mothers with one child aged 0-6 and 14 hours for two children.T

[–] Peck@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago

So they get compensated about quarter of their yearly expenses with this btw bill. If they had an equivalent of this in us I'd get about 6k yearly from gvmt for each child. Not too shabby in my book.

[–] rosuperiorcartanegra@piefed.social 12 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Gearing up for the future wars. Need as much man power as they can get!

[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 15 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

The best time to begin replacing your dead soldiers is before you start feeding them into a meatgrinder.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 10 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Band aids, band aids , who doesn't love band aids?

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 5 days ago (2 children)

1500$ is like diaper budget for a month

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 3 points 5 days ago

I sincerely hope that's an exaggeration, but I did call it a bandaid for a reason.

[–] dropped_packet@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 days ago

What are you feeding that thing?!?

[–] selkiesidhe@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 days ago

Ooo you could buy maybe MAYBE buy a months worth of baby supplies on that. Cool. Yeah. That'll fix everything wrong with everything.

[–] floop@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Maybe this will stop Chinese tourists from holding their babies over trash cans, so they can shit into them….

Because, really, it really seems that what the Chinese could use is diapers, and the training to use them.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Maybe this will stop Chinese tourists from holding their babies over trash cans, so they can shit into them….

Pardon?

[–] floop@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I get your shock and confusion. The first time I thought, I was also shocked and confused.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Why the hostility? Or have I misread your comment?

[–] floo@retrolemmy.com 2 points 4 days ago

Keep telling us how our existence hurts you. Keep telling us how we are winning.