this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2025
367 points (88.6% liked)

You Should Know

35829 readers
633 users here now

YSK - for all the things that can make your life easier!

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with YSK.

All posts must begin with YSK. If you're a Mastodon user, then include YSK after @youshouldknow. This is a community to share tips and tricks that will help you improve your life.



Rule 2- Your post body text must include the reason "Why" YSK:

**In your post's text body, you must include the reason "Why" YSK: It’s helpful for readability, and informs readers about the importance of the content. **



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-YSK posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-YSK posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

If you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- The majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Rule 11- Posts must actually be true: Disiniformation, trolling, and being misleading will not be tolerated. Repeated or egregious attempts will earn you a ban. This also applies to filing reports: If you continually file false reports YOU WILL BE BANNED! We can see who reports what, and shenanigans will not be tolerated.



Partnered Communities:

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

Credits

Our icon(masterpiece) was made by @clen15!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Gas stoves fill the air in your home with particulate matter (pm), which has been found to increase cancer risk in the long term.

So next time you buy a stove, consider choosing an induction stove.

Btw, gas stoves being better or faster than induction is a myth. They have certain specific advantages, but they are actually slower.

Obligatory Technology Connections video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUywI8YGy0Y

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 7rokhym@lemmy.ca 91 points 1 week ago (10 children)

The studies I read, there was no ventilation / exhaust fan. The point was that low income households using these stoves often don’t have proper ventilation and it makes them dangerous. I didn’t find much evidence that using them with proper ventilation is actually a serious problem.

Further, cooking releases all sorts of chemicals from incomplete combustion in the air if something is burning, as well as the toxic chemicals release from nonstick cookware at very high temperatures, so cooking without ventilation is bad for your health would be the message I’d take away. I find most people are completely unaware of the hazard.

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (4 children)

With proper ventilation you can do everything, you can work with hazardous gases and nuclear materials, if the ventilation is sufficient.

[–] null@slrpnk.net 13 points 1 week ago

Radiation ventilation is fun to say

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] IMALlama@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Very few residences have proper ventilation. In the US, a microwave above the stove is common. Microwave often do have a fan function, but the vast majority don't vent outdoors. I doubt that running air through a very thin filter will do much good.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 77 points 1 week ago (23 children)

Induction is the best, I'll never go back

[–] EmoDuck@sh.itjust.works 49 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Induction is best in theory, however in practice it's unfortunately often paired with these shitty buttonless capacitive controls that are harder to decipher that hieroglyphics as well as """smart""" features

They do still sell induction stoves with classic dumb buttons but they are either hard to come buy or aimed at professional chefs, which instantly adds two zeros to their price

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 15 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Mine has simple capacitive controls. Turn it on, higher number is more hotter. Very simple.

Apparently it has other features, not bothered with them.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 9 points 1 week ago

Tbf the flat buttonless style makes them really easy to clean.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (22 replies)
[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 58 points 1 week ago (9 children)

the maillard reaction causes cancer. I'm still not boiling my beef.

[–] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 30 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Photons cause cancer so I guess I may as well do nothing at all.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 53 points 1 week ago (43 children)

Appliance repairman here. What I tell my clients about gas in general is that: 1. When natural gas burns it create CO. 2. There is a none zero chance the thing can blow up.

Electric cooking appliances have an absolute zero chance of either of these two things happening.

I try to get people to switch to electric for these reasons some just like the aesthetic of cooking on gas.

[–] itsnotits@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

a non-zero* chance

load more comments (42 replies)
[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 39 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (16 children)

They have certain specific advantages, but they are actually slower.

This entirely depends on the stove. Consumer-lever stoves? Sure, definitely. Commercial stoves? Probably not. Commercial stoves put out 3-4x the BTUs of a high-end consumer stove, and usually can't be installed in a home because they require significant shielding around them (so you don't burn a building down) and a very high flow hood. The highest-end Wolf range has a single burner that has a maximum output of 10,000BTU, and costs a whopping $17,000; a fairly basic range top for a commercial kitchen has six burners that can all output 32,000BTU, and costs about $3700. For stir-frying specifically, you can get a single ring wok burners outputting 92,000-125,000BTU starting at about $700 for natural gas (and a helluva lot more if you use LP).

Unfortunately, I can't find a solid conversion between gas and induction stove capabilities.

Oh, and FWIW - if you live somewhere with an unstable power grid, a natural gas or LP stove will continue to function when the power is out, albeit you'll need to light it manually. We lose power fairly regularly due to storms--usually only a day at a time, but sometimes as long as 3-4 days--and it would be a real hassle to have all electric appliances when there's no power.

[–] hinterlufer@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago (19 children)

1 kW is 3412 BTU/h (=BTUs)

Most induction stovetops have a boost function with around 3-4 kW (that's about 13000 BTUs).

BUT contrary to a gas stove top, almost all of the energy is actually put into the pot instead of the surroundings (only 30-40% of the energy from a gas stove is used to heat the pot). Meaning that a 4 kW induction cooktop should be comparable to a 40'000 BTUs gas stove (single burner).

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] hit_the_rails@reddthat.com 10 points 1 week ago (4 children)

a natural gas or LP stove will continue to function when the power is out

LP camp stoves work without power and are a good backup for an electric stove

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Branquinho@lemmy.eco.br 25 points 1 week ago
[–] purplemonkeymad@programming.dev 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We swapped out a gas for induction, it's amazing to be able to put the temp down below very hot. Also very responsive to power changes, and can wipe clean.

[–] Monzcarro@feddit.uk 10 points 1 week ago

I love my induction hob for all the reasons you mention. It is by far the best hob I've used - much better than gas - and I cook a lot. The only slight downside is ensuring you have the right pans, but they're widely available. My enamelled cast iron casserole pot works a treat.

[–] PennyRoyal@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 week ago (7 children)

I read that running an extractor hood mitigates the risk a fair amount. Not completely, but enough that you shouldn’t worry if gas is your only option

[–] tburkhol@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Since this article is specifically about pm 2.5, I'm going to chime in and say I have a gas range with no extractor, and the only time my pm2.5 sensor picks anything up is when frying generates smoke and oil aerosols. That's more a function of cooking temperature than fuel, and my induction hotplate will generate just as much.

CO2? Definitely more with gas. Trace chemicals? Probably more with gas, but all the studies I've seen are just about running the cooktop, with no food, in a sealed room. Run the extraction hood or open a window when you cook - it's not just heat source.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] hildegarde@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 1 week ago (9 children)

Yes, but...

Cooking itself also does this. If you are searing or frying that will also release dangerous particulates. Make sure you have and use a vent hood that vents outside the living space when you cook regardless of fuel.

I can say from personal experience of using every kind of home stove, that gas is both the worst and slowest. Boiling water for my morning coffee is fastest on induction, which takes about half the time as resistive or radiant electric, and gas takes nearly three times longer than that.

Though it might just be the american style of burner that directs the flame away from the center of the pan. I've not yet tried any other kind.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 week ago (11 children)

It's completely baffling that there are people unironically still defending gas stoves in 2025. There's no discussion to be had on the subject any more, induction is superior and that's final.

[–] frank@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 week ago

I would agree in places with good infrastructure. I lived somewhere with rampant power outages, sometimes for 5 days at a time.

Gas was sure nice then.

[–] evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think the people who claim gas stoves are best likely grew up either not cooking much, or had a decent gas stove, so their first exposure to an electric stove was super cheap, crappy electric coil stoves in student housing, or wherever they first lived as a young adult. Then when they were able to afford better, they got a better gas stove.

I have a really crappy gas stove, and it makes me yearn for the cheap electric coil stoves of my youth.

People say that gas stoves are more powerful and responsive, when the truth is that more powerful stoves are more powerful, and "responsiveness" is a fake concern. My crappy gas stove takes forever to get a pot of water boiling, especially compared to coil stoves. Yeah, you can turn a gas stove to 100% quickly, but that's only better if it can put out more power. It won't heat up any faster than an electric stove if the electric stove takes double the time, but also has double the power. There's also not many cases where "time to maximum heat" is what you care about, I can't think of any.

Responsiveness the other way (hot to cool) doesn't matter when you have a high thermal mass in the pan (or the pan itself has high mass), it only matters when the pan and contents are light, in which case, you just take the pan off the heat.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Tudsamfa@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Everything else being equal, of course electric and induction stoves are preferable to gas. I spend most of my life with an electric stove, no apartment I ever saw had induction, but I didn't particularly like the gas stove I had to use for some years.

But if you want the worst user experience ever, find an electric stove with touchscreen controls. What the hell, landlord, where did you even find that one?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] troed@fedia.io 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

idk - there should be some very clear cancer statistics to back up such a claim between countries like Sweden (<1% gas stoves, all are electric) vs other countries then.

[–] ilega_dh@feddit.nl 39 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

One cause of cancer like this probably won’t be visible on a national scale, too many other factors come into play that will muddy the data

However, it’s not “idk”, the current science on gas stoves being bad for your health is quite clear. Not just cancer, but also for other lung-related issues like asthma: https://www.cancercenter.com/community/blog/2024/09/are-gas-stoves-bad-for-your-health

[–] troed@fedia.io 9 points 1 week ago

You're right - the report they link to here (Table 2 is good) makes that quite clear.

https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.2c09289

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (9 children)

Since this is the stove thread:

I had a pot of salt water overflow from boiling on a electric stove and now there is this tough ring of residue around the burner caked on and it won't scrub off. Is using a razor blade to scrape it off really the only option?

I'm worried I will scratch the stove top and the landleech will have an excuse to steal my security deposit.

Edit: thank you all for your helpful advice

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 12 points 1 week ago

I mean... paying for shit you damaged during your stay is kind of the point of a security deposit.

[–] Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Bartender's Friend or Pink Stuff should take it right off.

[–] mox@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 1 week ago

*Bar Keepers Friend

[–] 12newguy@mander.xyz 8 points 1 week ago

I've used a razor for really stuck on bits on our glass top stove, but this cleaner also seems to do quite well: https://weiman.com/glass-cooktop-cleaner-polish

For the razor, keep it at a shallow angle (I tend to go around 20 or 30 degrees above the stovetop), and keep a small amount of water on the surface. I usually have a damp rag that I wipe the razor and stovetop with occasionally during the scraping process, to remove the small pieces that come off.

Also, if you are nervous about damaging the stovetop itself, maybe try something only lightly abrasive and warm water, and let the water work it's magic. (I see you have already tried this, so maybe that isn't helpful :/ ) From a chemistry perspective, salt water shouldn't exactly leave behind an insoluble residue, but IDK what else was cooking in the water.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›