this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2025
370 points (96.5% liked)

Science Memes

13670 readers
2275 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Depress_Mode@lemmy.world 211 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (5 children)

TL;DR: No. The half-life of hydrogen-sulfide (one of smelliest constituents of a fart) reacting with the oxygen in the jar from just your fart is 12-37 hours. The article gives an example of a particularly potent hypothetical fart that would only retain any distinguishable odor for 9 days tops.

[–] HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world 107 points 3 days ago

This guy farts

[–] SpicyColdFartChamber@lemm.ee 40 points 3 days ago (1 children)

My dreams have been shattered.

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago (2 children)

There is a reasonable amount of oxygen in farts? Really?

[–] Depress_Mode@lemmy.world 21 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

4% of a fart is oxygen, according to the article, which is enough to react with all of the hydrogen-sulfide, since 1 mole of oxygen is enough to react with more than 1 mole of hydrogen-sulfide (H₂S makes up around 1% of the total volume).

[–] BastingChemina@slrpnk.net 4 points 3 days ago

What if we add oxygen absorbers in the jar as well ?

[–] HexadecimalSky@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Persumebly not but there is oxygen in the air, usually.

[–] glowie@h4x0r.host 7 points 3 days ago

Dammit I wanted to breathe in only farts

[–] peteypete420@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So if I farted into a vaccum sealed bag... I could save it then?

[–] LethargicPuppy14@lemm.ee 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Sadly, the fart itself comes with oxygen included

[–] peteypete420@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 days ago

So i have to design an attachment to take oxygen out of the fart before sealing it? I better start watching some TED talks this could be some work.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] myster0n@feddit.nl 191 points 3 days ago (6 children)

That reminds me of when I was a kid, farting in the bath. As I saw the bubbles coming up to the surface, I wanted to catch them.

So I took whatever plastic container I could find around the bath - most likely the cap of a shampoo bottle - submerged it, and held it close to my butt when I felt the next fart coming.

I succeeded in catching some of the fart in the cap. Then I claimed my prize by sniffing directly from the cap. It was so much worse than any fart I've ever smelled.

As a true scientist, I've repeated the experiment on a few later occasions, and without a doubt : bath farts captured in plastic containers smell much worse than normal farts.

Thank you for coming to my TED talk.

[–] chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz 26 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I remember sitting in the hall during school as a second grader taking to a friend. I said, "I wonder if you farted in a balloon if it would float." A teacher overheard me and scolded me about it, for some reason.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 27 points 3 days ago

That was the perfect opportunity to teach the first step of The Scientific Method. The next step was the Hypothesis - what do you think will happen, based on the scientific knowledge you already have?

Then you have to Plan The Experiment, which in this case, would probably really energize the students' brain power. They'll LOVE figuring out this experiment. I would bet that EVERY student would be engaged in this one.

It's the Doing The Experiment that might be problematic, and end up with the teacher explaining themselves to the School Board: "All I can say is, it seemed like a good idea at the time. I guess you had to be there."

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago

Your teachers sucked. Mine would've told me to try at home

[–] Uli@sopuli.xyz 24 points 3 days ago

That's the same way they did it on Mythbusters.

[–] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 days ago

My brother used to fart in a tennis ball can and hold me down and make me smell it. I agree, contained farts are awfuler.

[–] hanke@feddit.nu 8 points 3 days ago

Thank you for your contributions to science

[–] IrritableOcelot@beehaw.org 6 points 3 days ago

I think its because while its under water it doesn't have a chance to diffuse into a larger volume of air -- normally farts are pretty dilute by the time it makes it to anyone's nose.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] abbadon420@lemm.ee 41 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They've chosen the worst jar to put in the picture

[–] HexadecimalSky@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Yeah, they didn't fart in that jar, shart maybe...

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 37 points 3 days ago (6 children)

Why does the fart jar in the picture have a spoon in it?

[–] Tiger@sh.itjust.works 15 points 3 days ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Pregnenolone@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Hey sweetie, would you like anymore fart mousse?

[–] D_C@lemm.ee 8 points 3 days ago

To agitate the fart in 20 years.

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

why is the jar brown to start with, what kind of a fart are we dealing with here sir?

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 6 points 3 days ago

A better question might be what kind of farts did they have to laminate the inside of that jar so thoroughly that only a spoon could extract it?

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 34 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Who do you think you are?

Runnin' round leaving scars

Saving your jar of farts

Tearing love apart

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 3 days ago

I say that every time I hear this song too hahaha.

You're gonna catch a cold,

From the ice inside your hole.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] socsa@piefed.social 32 points 3 days ago (2 children)
[–] h3mlocke@lemm.ee 8 points 3 days ago

Yahh the article said farted not sharted...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com 14 points 3 days ago (2 children)

We should sell barrel aged farts to rich idiots.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Rin@lemm.ee 11 points 2 days ago

It'd probably smell like flowers based on where the world is going

[–] MrJameGumb@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Farting in jars is dangerous business. You don't want to end up like that lady from 90 Day Fiancé do you???

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 8 points 3 days ago

Something about that story smells fishy.

$1k / jar and brought in $100k... so that's 100 jars total. Maybe a little extra in case of an accident during shipping. So why did she need to fart 50x per week? Shit, that would be $2.4 million per year of she could actually sell that.

So the way I see it, she was farting in a jar 50x per week but only selling 2 of them... that's not a business, that's a fetish she managed to squeeze a whiff of money out of.

[–] NotLemming@lemm.ee 9 points 3 days ago

Wouldnt the poop particles have rotted away in that time and maybe turned into fertiliser? Maybe some interesting fungi would be growing. Ah, the circle of life.

[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

"It happened ONE TIME in 4th grade!!"

~I~ ~lied..!~

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

I guess it dependson how you store it?

Yes, funny, but methane falls apart if exposed to UV light. Then again, glass blocks most UV...

[–] Masterkraft0r@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

methane does not have a smell. most hydrocarbons don't. that's why they put smelly stuff (mostly thiols, which are very smelly sulphur compounds) into butane, gasoline, etc.

[–] Ledivin@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

What? This isn't even remotely true. Standard glass blocks half of UV at best (UVB), and it's the less harmful half.

load more comments
view more: next ›