this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

15976 readers
76 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Wouldn't it evaporate in like 5 seconds, then? Also, drainage would be the easiest thing ever. Don't even need a slanted floor.

[–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That'd be awful. You want the stuff in water out of your house, not precipitated all over the floor.

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What stuff in water? Are you referring to drainage?

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Minerals, dirt, pathogens, etc.

If you wash your ear chicken (you shouldn't), that splatter would be much more evenly spread over every surface it lands on.

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Well yeah, I'm not advocating we convert to surface-tensionless water, here. I'm just pointing out the flaw in this meme's logic.

Now on to serious questions, wtf is an ear chicken?

[–] CTDummy@aussie.zone 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Auto correct from raw? Otherwise, god help us.

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

Yes, I will correct.

[–] schnokobaer@feddit.org 0 points 1 week ago

But that 2 micron puddle would also evaporate in 2 microseconds!

[–] judgyweevil@feddit.it 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That's how water works in videogames

[–] vonxylofon@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] judgyweevil@feddit.it 0 points 1 week ago

Water just doesn't work in minecraft

[–] loomy@lemy.lol 0 points 1 week ago
[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Your floor would have to be supernaturally flat and level for that to happen.

[–] sxan@midwest.social 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

the world is crooked ! reality is a lie !

[–] meyotch@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Lambs to the cosmic slaughter!

[–] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 0 points 1 week ago

ah yes ! that's the one

[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We would probably just not exist as liquids that want to hold together are pretty essential. Even if you just imagine blood not leaving your body through the tiniest nick.

[–] Psionicsickness@reddthat.com 0 points 1 week ago

I mean maybe? Surface tension play a role in blood staying on the wound, but it’s the blood itself that clots. I think the bigger issue would be your eyes, but maybe evolution creates a light sensor that wasn’t developed underwater…

I’m at a loss. In my heart of hearts I know we all die if water doesn’t tend to hold together, but I can’t think of WHY. Call xkcd.

[–] sxan@midwest.social 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Would capillary action still work, or does it depend on surface tension? I'm thinking about superfluids. Would the water stop at covering the floor?

[–] Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You can try it yourself by adding a drop of dish soap to some water. Capillary action would still work and the water would evaporate long before covering the entire floor.

[–] I_am_10_squirrels@beehaw.org 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Capillary rise depends on surface tension, gamma. If surface tension was 0, there would be no capillary rise. Soap decreases surface tension, but it's not 0.

collapsed inline media

[–] Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org 0 points 1 week ago

Oh nevermind then. I just looked it up and came across the so-called Rollin film. I don't know if that only appears in helium or if superfluid water would be subject to that effect as well. I wonder how that would impact its behaviour.

[–] 58008@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

What if each H~2~O molecule was coated in a hydrophobic substance?

[–] Gwaer@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Wouldn’t it just be a superfluid at that point? Those things are ungovernable. We’d have way more problems that just spilled puddles. They crawl out of the beakers on their own. It’d be an absolute nightmare.

My bad superfluids are 0 viscosity not surface tension carry on we’re safe.

[–] And009@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 1 week ago

Assuming my home is perfectly level, which it is not

[–] Admetus@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sounds like a lot less cleaning in the house as it would just evaporate in less than a minute?

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

High humidity tends to ruin a lot of houses/construction materials over time, but you'll likely first notice random spores

[–] Azzu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean you can just ventilate whenever you spill something.

The larger problem would be the entire water-based ecosystem.

[–] Admetus@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 week ago

We need xkcd to explain what would happen on a large scale if water was like this.

[–] PillowD@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago
[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 0 points 1 week ago

Probably our bodies would instantly collapse into ooze like that guy in the first X-Men.

[–] Wilzax@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You could also clean it by putting a cloth in the lowest point it would run to so this sounds like a win to me

[–] yuri@pawb.social 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

i think without surface tension it would also just fall out of the cloth as soon as you lift it, because nothing would wick against gravity. in fact of your floor is pourous at all, i reckon the water would just immediately all flow further down and you’d be left with a dry floor.

[–] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oil doesn’t have surface tension and it stays in the cloth. At a certain point it’s not surface tension that keeps liquids together but friction.

Says my uneducated ass.

[–] yuri@pawb.social 0 points 1 week ago

oils have low surface tension, i believe a true no-surface tension liquid is as impossible as a true frictionless surface.

i didn’t consider friction though! i think the rag would still dry out completely pretty quick, but you might have a few seconds while the water falls out depending on how tight the mesh is?

i dunno, this is a real whacky thing to think about!

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Without surface tension it would stick to whatever thing attracts it more. And a normal piece of cloth attracts water way more than a normal non-carpet floor.

But it also wouldn't flow freely as the GP expects either. Some oils have almost no surface tension, and they are famously a nightmare to clean up.

As a positive, the water would evaporate faster.

[–] yuri@pawb.social 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

the cloth attracts it because of the capillary action pulling water into the gaps therein, and capillary action relies on surface tension! i think without outside forces like suction, the liquid in this scenario would never flow against gravity.

i think hahah

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Surface tension doesn't tell you anything about the cloth-water interface.

[–] yuri@pawb.social 0 points 1 week ago

i mean it’s literally why liquids wick into cloth

[–] monk@lemmy.unboiled.info 0 points 1 week ago

good news: it wouldn't be