this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2025
601 points (99.3% liked)

politics

24793 readers
2602 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Trump has faced growing resentment over the decision of his attorney general, Pam Bondi, to withhold information

Mike Johnson, speaker of the House, called for the justice department to make public documents related to the disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein, breaking with Donald Trump over an issue that has roiled the president’s rightwing base.

It was a rare moment of friction between Trump and the speaker, a top ally on Capitol Hill, and came as the president faces growing backlash from conservatives who had expected him to make public everything known about Epstein, who killed himself in 2019 while in federal custody as he faced sex-trafficking charges.

Earlier in the day, Republicans voted down an attempt by Democrats to insert language into legislation that would require files related to the Epstein case to be made public. But the minority party is determined to keep the issue alive, and Democrats on the House judiciary committee have demanded that its Republican chair, Trump ally Jim Jordan, hold a hearing with Bondi and her deputy as well as the leaders of the FBI to answer questions about Epstein.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 237 points 1 day ago (3 children)

It's working, keep attacking these fuckers. I just left an angry voicemail to my GOP rep sounding like an angry conservative.

[–] miss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.com 97 points 1 day ago (6 children)

How much moonshine did you have to guzzle beforehand?

[–] Confused_Emus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Just tip the still over and chug til it’s gone.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

So… a Tuesday?

[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

It was about 17 tubes of vagisil.

collapsed inline media

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 10 points 1 day ago

And how much dip did you accidentally swallow while frothing with rage?

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oddly I find tequila makes me sound more republican.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 15 points 1 day ago

I'm drunk, and it's all Mexico's fault!

[–] redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I never had a reason to buy johnny walker blue until just now

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That seems a bit expensive for them.

(And actually I think that was Carter’s preferred drink.) plus it’s imported. Should probably be drinking a bourbon instead.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

My rep is Scott Fucking Perry and this might actually work on him

[–] andyburke@fedia.io 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He's your rep. You don't need to pretend, just say you expected Trump to follow through on his promises and you want Scott Fucking Perry to do his job and hold the president of the US accountable.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago

Perry famously will not meet with constituents who are no pre-vetted. He has sent me many, many “Fuck you I do what I want” letters in response to non-partisan messages I’ve sent him.

The only people he cares about are MAGA. The dude helped plan Jan 6.

And the worst part is that our Democratic challenger is a former Republican TV anchor.

Because that is literally the best this area can do.

Vote Blue No Matter Who™

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 114 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The surest sign yet that the political winds are blowing against Trump on this one, since Johnson is not only a weather vane, but a coward.

[–] FenderStratocaster@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Bullshit. Nothing will happen. He's a convicted felon. They didn't do anything for that. They can't for this. He's a king. He's a dictator. Nothing will happen. If you don't like it, get violent or leave the country. Democracy is dead.

[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 day ago

You appear to have read a different post than the one I wrote.

[–] joekar1990@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's like WWE it's all scripted drama. It's why murkowski and Collins can faint anger and rotate votes for things.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] thallamabond@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He is also 3rd in line for president :(

[–] match@pawb.social 8 points 1 day ago

quickly, appeal to his greed and lust for power!

[–] forrgott@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 day ago

theyrethesameimage.jpg

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 79 points 1 day ago (2 children)

…right after he and all the other chucklefucks voted to NOT release it.

Honestly, how the fuck does ANYONE take these fucksticks seriously?

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Your average person isn't paying attention to details like this. They don't know, and frankly don't care even if they did.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A committee voted, not every member.

[–] Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

There was also a separate full vote. Every single Republican present voted against it.

It's like, why not just release some BS and call it a day

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 70 points 1 day ago

If ONLY there was SOMETHING he could DO! UNFORTUNATELY he's just the LEADER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES!

[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 46 points 1 day ago (1 children)

lol, but then today he votes against bringing it to a vote?

[–] ganksy@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think it didn't make it out of committee (pls down vote if I'm wrong) so never reached the floor for a full vote.

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 37 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Stole this from elsewhere on Lemmy, which was apparently snagged from reddit, and then downloaded to my phone & 2 laptops...


From reddit.... https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/s/eBjDX0zt07


Here are the Epstein Files. For those of you who have seen this comment before, my apologies. I am trying to keep this information alive. Please feel free to share. Contact me if you want provenance.

https://joshwho.net/EpsteinList/gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.1320.0-combined.pdf (verified court documents)

https://joshwho.net/EpsteinList/black-book-unredacted.pdf (verified pre-Bondi) Trump is on page 85, or pdf pg. 80

Trump’s name is circled. The circled individuals are the ones involved in the trafficking ring according to the person who originally released the book. These people would be “The List “ Here is the story.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hsiKUXrlcac

—————————other Epstein Information

https://cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/Johnson/_TrumpEpstein/_Calif/_Lawsuit.pdf here’s a court doc of Epstein and Trump raping a 13 yr old together.

Some people think this claim is a hoax. Here is Katies testimony on youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gnib-OORRRo

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] a9cx34udP4ZZ0@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago

Let me guess: "but just the ones Pam Bondi finds credible".

Shockingly you won't find a single republican on Trump ally on the list because those aren't credible....

There's 0 chance Johnson is going against Trump, this is all theater so when Trump's name magically isn't connected to Epstein they can pretend like it's a legitimate list.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Blah blah blah blah blah.

That's all this is. Talk.

When it comes time for action they'll vote no like they literally just did. This is all about trying to have their way and keep their base.

[–] Petter1@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I am still shocked every time on how naive some people can be, like, a Person lying all the time, even contradicting themselves in the same sentence, and people still believe that that person does what they say?!

I mean WTF?! How do such people survive?

[–] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

Warning labels.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago

calls for release of files

votes against releasing files knowing base is stupid and will listen to him say the files should be released but not pay attention when he actually votes against it

[–] ileftreddit@piefed.social 17 points 1 day ago

Call their offices. Find one from your state and just call asking why? Why don’t you think the files should be public? Why all the secrecy? Who are you protecting?

If you read this, it’s me asking you personally, directly, to call a congressperson from your state and ask why

[–] snausagesinablanket@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Mike's Johnson is jealous of the kid play he missed out on.

[–] BotsRuinedEverything@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Even if it does get released we won't see the original list. I'm sure it will be heavily redacted. It's not like there will be any actionable information. What do we expect to see, exactly; A list of names? It's not like there will be an annotated list of crimes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

And then he will be one step closer to being President Mike Johnson!

pro gamer move

[–] Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

PFFFFFFFFF, they're forgetting it's 100% a cult of personality.

What Texan is holding his rifle in the air screaming "JOHNSON" or "VANCE" and slapping a big fat bumper sticker on his 4x4?

Just because you impeach Jessie James, it won't make you Jessie James.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago

Absolutely. When HitlerPig assumes room temperature, there will be an all-out WAR for control of MAGA. That should be fun to watch.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Nah, if impeached (and found guilty by the Senate) Vance becomes president and picks his VP himself. Speaker of the house stays where they are

[–] pachrist@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Hey now, there could have been some temptingly pleather couches on Epstein Island.

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Maybe Mike will fall outa window for this outrageous show of defiance against dear leader.

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

Polonium in the Cheetos

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Withholding the Epstein list, convenient gaps in the "Oh, we found it!" video. Looks like Trumps method of putting bleeding edge incompetent people in positions of power comes back to bite his sorry ass.

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago
[–] SkabySkalywag@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago

Oops someone missed the most recent memo.

load more comments
view more: next ›