It's working, keep attacking these fuckers. I just left an angry voicemail to my GOP rep sounding like an angry conservative.
this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2025
549 points (99.5% liked)
politics
24781 readers
2487 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
549
US House speaker Mike Johnson calls for release of Epstein files amid backlash
(www.theguardian.com)
How much moonshine did you have to guzzle beforehand?
Just tip the still over and chug til it’s gone.
So… a Tuesday?
And how much dip did you accidentally swallow while frothing with rage?
Oddly I find tequila makes me sound more republican.
I'm drunk, and it's all Mexico's fault!
I never had a reason to buy johnny walker blue until just now
That seems a bit expensive for them.
(And actually I think that was Carter’s preferred drink.) plus it’s imported. Should probably be drinking a bourbon instead.
I have a particular country club fart sniffing donor type in mind.
As an actor, none!
My rep is Scott Fucking Perry and this might actually work on him
He's your rep. You don't need to pretend, just say you expected Trump to follow through on his promises and you want Scott Fucking Perry to do his job and hold the president of the US accountable.
Perry famously will not meet with constituents who are no pre-vetted. He has sent me many, many “Fuck you I do what I want” letters in response to non-partisan messages I’ve sent him.
The only people he cares about are MAGA. The dude helped plan Jan 6.
And the worst part is that our Democratic challenger is a former Republican TV anchor.
Because that is literally the best this area can do.
Vote Blue No Matter Who™
load more comments
(1 replies)
The surest sign yet that the political winds are blowing against Trump on this one, since Johnson is not only a weather vane, but a coward.
Bullshit. Nothing will happen. He's a convicted felon. They didn't do anything for that. They can't for this. He's a king. He's a dictator. Nothing will happen. If you don't like it, get violent or leave the country. Democracy is dead.
You appear to have read a different post than the one I wrote.
It's like WWE it's all scripted drama. It's why murkowski and Collins can faint anger and rotate votes for things.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
He is also 3rd in line for president :(
quickly, appeal to his greed and lust for power!
theyrethesameimage.jpg
…right after he and all the other chucklefucks voted to NOT release it.
Honestly, how the fuck does ANYONE take these fucksticks seriously?
Your average person isn't paying attention to details like this. They don't know, and frankly don't care even if they did.
This is an extremely salacious story. Sure, a lot of people have no idea, but the Epstein story has always had more traction than average.
Don't forget that QANON was the factor that shot HitlerPig's campaign to the front of the pack, and the primary focus of QANON, at least at the beginning, was outrage over child sex trafficking by government officials. People who had never paid the slightest attention to politics were now "experts," thanks to the QANON rabbit hole.
THOSE people put HitlerPig over the top, and he needs to keep them on board. Once they realize that HE is the one they are truly after, many of them will crash, and either vote Democrat, or more likely, abandon politics altogether, which is fine, too.
A committee voted, not every member.
There was also a separate full vote. Every single Republican present voted against it.
It's like, why not just release some BS and call it a day
load more comments
(1 replies)
If ONLY there was SOMETHING he could DO! UNFORTUNATELY he's just the LEADER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES!
lol, but then today he votes against bringing it to a vote?
I think it didn't make it out of committee (pls down vote if I'm wrong) so never reached the floor for a full vote.
Stole this from elsewhere on Lemmy, which was apparently snagged from reddit, and then downloaded to my phone & 2 laptops...
From reddit.... https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/s/eBjDX0zt07
Here are the Epstein Files. For those of you who have seen this comment before, my apologies. I am trying to keep this information alive. Please feel free to share. Contact me if you want provenance.
https://joshwho.net/EpsteinList/gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.1320.0-combined.pdf (verified court documents)
https://joshwho.net/EpsteinList/black-book-unredacted.pdf (verified pre-Bondi) Trump is on page 85, or pdf pg. 80
Trump’s name is circled. The circled individuals are the ones involved in the trafficking ring according to the person who originally released the book. These people would be “The List “ Here is the story.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hsiKUXrlcac
—————————other Epstein Information
https://cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/Johnson/_TrumpEpstein/_Calif/_Lawsuit.pdf here’s a court doc of Epstein and Trump raping a 13 yr old together.
Some people think this claim is a hoax. Here is Katies testimony on youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gnib-OORRRo
load more comments
(3 replies)
Blah blah blah blah blah.
That's all this is. Talk.
When it comes time for action they'll vote no like they literally just did. This is all about trying to have their way and keep their base.
I am still shocked every time on how naive some people can be, like, a Person lying all the time, even contradicting themselves in the same sentence, and people still believe that that person does what they say?!
I mean WTF?! How do such people survive?
Warning labels.
Let me guess: "but just the ones Pam Bondi finds credible".
Shockingly you won't find a single republican on Trump ally on the list because those aren't credible....
There's 0 chance Johnson is going against Trump, this is all theater so when Trump's name magically isn't connected to Epstein they can pretend like it's a legitimate list.
Call their offices. Find one from your state and just call asking why? Why don’t you think the files should be public? Why all the secrecy? Who are you protecting?
If you read this, it’s me asking you personally, directly, to call a congressperson from your state and ask why
Mike's Johnson is jealous of the kid play he missed out on.
Lmao
Even if it does get released we won't see the original list. I'm sure it will be heavily redacted. It's not like there will be any actionable information. What do we expect to see, exactly; A list of names? It's not like there will be an annotated list of crimes.
load more comments
(1 replies)
And then he will be one step closer to being President Mike Johnson!
pro gamer move
PFFFFFFFFF, they're forgetting it's 100% a cult of personality.
What Texan is holding his rifle in the air screaming "JOHNSON" or "VANCE" and slapping a big fat bumper sticker on his 4x4?
Just because you impeach Jessie James, it won't make you Jessie James.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Nah, if impeached (and found guilty by the Senate) Vance becomes president and picks his VP himself. Speaker of the house stays where they are
load more comments
(1 replies)
calls for release of files
votes against releasing files knowing base is stupid and will listen to him say the files should be released but not pay attention when he actually votes against it
Withholding the Epstein list, convenient gaps in the "Oh, we found it!" video. Looks like Trumps method of putting bleeding edge incompetent people in positions of power comes back to bite his sorry ass.
🍿
Maybe Mike will fall outa window for this outrageous show of defiance against dear leader.
Polonium in the Cheetos
view more: next ›