this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2025
36 points (100.0% liked)

Selfhosted

49470 readers
694 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hey folks, being the family IT man I've held onto all of my families photos/videos over the last 20 years

I've been pretty careless with the backups and I know if I don't do anything it's only a matter of time before I lose them

Although I've never used them, tape drives seem to be the best so I thought I'd ask here if anyone uses them for their homelab?

It might be overkill for a few GB of photos but I'd also use the tape drives for data hoarding purposes so it's a win win in my book

top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dgdft@lemmy.world 21 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

tape drives seem to be the best

Tape drives are the keytars of the tech world. They seem cool and a pro can really jam with them... but they're not the most practical and you should really get a guitar or a keyboard until you know what you're doing.

Yeet your shit onto rsync.net or sth else simple and call it a day, unless you're in it for the meme.

[–] shellington@lemmings.world 8 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I have around 65TB backed up on LTO5 tapes. Found them very reliable when needed for a restore and great for an off-site backup.

However I would say it is overkill for anything under 20TB.

[–] markovs_gun@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

How much did this system cost? I have an idea for a product and one of the key parts of it is having a huge amount of local storage. I would need like 10x what you have though.

[–] shellington@lemmings.world 1 points 21 minutes ago (1 children)

The lto 5 drives are around $400 on ebay and the tapes can be had for around $20 each - less if bought in bulk and each tape hold 1.5TB.

I don't find it that slow as in the event of a restore like i am doing at the moment, I can get through around 3 tapes per 24 hours.

One thing I will say is although newer LTO standards allow you to treat it like a normal drive it works better using proper software designed for the task like Iperius Backup.

[–] shellington@lemmings.world 1 points 20 minutes ago

If you have a bigger budget around $2k something like LTO7 with 6TB tapes would be fantastic for larger data sets.

[–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 8 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

a few GB of photos

get an m-disc burner and make multiple full backups to distribute around your family

[–] philpo@feddit.org 4 points 6 hours ago

Yep.

Absolutely the best advice.

I always recommend the same:

  1. Get a secure proper cloud storage (Backblaze, Hetzner Object Storage/Storage box, Ionos,etc.) for daily/incremental backups and single file recovery. (As Tandberg is no longer an alternative this seems to be the only choice atm). Make sure you have encryption on and a proper rotation/deletion schedule.

  2. Get an external harddrive for a full backup every few weeks/months, preferably store it offsite, even better if you get two and rotate them offsite.

  3. Get a M-DISC Burner for the important files. Burn them onto BlueRay M Discs and store these at various offsite locations as well. Do so every few months. These have the advantage of being WORM (write once, read many).

Tapes are fucking expensive for current models and the old LTO drives one can get off Ebay,etc. tend to write faulty data and are almost always end of life. And as LTO is not backwards compatible beyond the generation below it's very much a possibility that people will have issues reading their tapes in 5 or 10 years.

[–] smashing3606@feddit.online 7 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Backblaze r2 is $6/tb/mo first 10gb are free

[–] theit8514@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

+1 for Backblaze. They have a convenient backup software too that works great. I backup my parents laptop using it, and use their S3 storage for my NAS backups.

[–] BigTrout75@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Forget the tapes. This is hard to say but just pay for online storage. It's $9.99 a month for 2TB from Google and Apple. Your data will be safe and accessable by family if something happens to you. You could also get a cheap NAS like device like this https://a.co/d/dgsnQbr and maybe every couple of months you create a offline backup onto another device.

[–] quokka1@mastodon.au 8 points 7 hours ago

@BigTrout75 @Squiddork and ffs print out some instructions on how to access it all. And tell someone where you've put that.
Consider using a decent password manager and you'll only need to let your loved ones know how to get into that.

[–] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 6 points 6 hours ago

Hetzner Storage box is $20/month for 10tb.

[–] jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works 5 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

My advice is avoid tape backups. The cost, risk of media degredation, and management overhead make them not worth it, especially for a homelab.

Also, restoring an entire VM is almost easier than recovering a single file, just because of the sequential nature of reading data from a tape. Data recoveries are pretty slow in general.

I backup to an external hard drive with regular copies to iDrive S3. Been doing it that way for a number of years with no problems.

[–] Unforeseen@sh.itjust.works 1 points 41 minutes ago

I've been using tape libraries since the early 2000's and I agree I wouldn't be bothered to have to deal with them in my homelab. Just having to manage rotations and so on... uuuugh no thanks.

[–] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 10 hours ago

The good ones... Are not cheap (if someone knows a cheap option though, I'd be happy to add it to my own repertoire!)

For me, I backup with:

  • A second NAS
  • a clone to a NAS at two other homes (family), which also sync to mine
  • Encrypted backups to generic cloud storage
[–] Ptsf@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Tape drives will be expensive and likely beyond overkill for this. I'd recommend you grab a blue ray DVD writer and use that instead. The discs are generally shelf stable for 25 years and hold about 50-128GB depending on the disc. Duplicates are cheap, storage is relatively easy, and it doesn't require constant upkeep/power like a hard drive would. Downsides? They just stopped making the discs, so they'll grow in cost over time. That's about it that I can think of.

[–] Davel23@fedia.io 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Sony stopped making recordable Blu-ray media. Other companies such as Panasonic and Verbatim are still in production.

[–] sandwichsaregood@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

If your purpose is long term archival you should probably be using M-Disc Blu-rays anyway, which are still actively made by Verbatim (and one other company).

[–] nottelling@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Why do tape drives seen to be best? What's your use case? They're still used in enterprise environments because they're insanely dense compared to hard disks, and it's real easy to load a truck with a few petabytes to ship elsewhere. Is that what you need? Density? Seems like not for just a few gigs.

If you want backups you need to ship your media, tapes or otherwise, off-site.

Pop your files into a cloud service and call it done. If you're looking for long term archives and don't want to use other people's computers, burn some DVDs and store them at someone else's house.

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Tapes can have long term issues in storage, as the tape reel winds will eventually start to bleed over magnetic signals from one wind to the next.

In analog world, they call it tape hiss. In digital world, with good error correction, it can last a long time, but is still ultimately prone to data corruption, eventually..

I recommend a video surveillance rated multi terabyte hard drive, they're designed to run 24/7. I have two 4TB Seagate Skyhawks.

[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 7 hours ago

LTO tape is good for 30 years when properly stored. You should be transferring the data to a newer format much sooner than that anyways. LTO drives are only backwards compatible for 1 or 2 versions, so you probably won't be able to find a working drive that can read your tape 30 years later.

[–] teppa@piefed.ca 2 points 9 hours ago

There are 24tb hard drives now.

[–] iii@mander.xyz 1 points 9 hours ago

DVDs are the same idea but easier