this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2025
537 points (97.0% liked)

Technology

72841 readers
2281 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/24690127

Solar energy experts in Germany are putting sun-catching cells under the magnifying glass with astounding results, according to multiple reports.

The Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems team is perfecting the use of lenses to concentrate sunlight onto solar panels, reducing size and costs while increasing performance, Interesting Engineering and PV Magazine reported.

The "technology has the potential to contribute to the energy transition, facilitating the shift toward more sustainable and renewable energy sources by combining minimal carbon footprint and energy demand with low levelized cost of electricity," the researchers wrote in a study published by the IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics.

The sun-catcher is called a micro-concentrating photovoltaic, or CPV, cell. The lens makes it different from standard solar panels that convert sunlight to energy with average efficiency rates around 20%, per MarketWatch. Fraunhofer's improved CPV cell has an astounding 36% rate in ideal conditions and is made with lower-cost parts. It cuts semiconductor materials "by a factor of 1,300 and reduces module areas by 30% compared to current state-of-the-art CPV systems," per IE.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I have not read the article yet, but I will be doing so after posting this. But from what I understand, concentrated cells via lenses already exist. The problem with them was keeping them cool.

Going to go read the actual article now.

Edit: Well, the article was very sparse on details. From what I understand of the comments, what's really been done here is making cells that can stand the kind of heat that would be focused onto them from the glass.

I want to say I saw a video about this a year ago or so, but it was more solar thermal, where you focus a bunch of mirrors onto a single point high up on a tower, and it's cooled by molten salt. But as I said, that's solar thermal, not solar power electricity.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Yeah the problem has always been that solar panels only really like to operate within a very narrow temperature band. It's why you can't just plate the Sahara desert in solar panels. In theory that would generate loads of power but the heat of the desert is way outside of their operating range.

There's been loads of ideas to heat/cool solar panels, the problem up until now has always been to do that without cutting into the panel's efficiency so much that it isn't worth doing.

But there's been videos on YouTube of people cooling solar panels with plasma cooling and phase change materials for a few years now.

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 day ago

Biosolar roofs work for rooftop applications

[–] jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I've been thinking about getting solar for a while, how bad is the efficiency loss at -30C to -20C?

[–] oyo@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

They gain efficiency at lower temps. Cool, clear days are best. At negative 20C you're looking at ~15-20% increase in power output from the panel itself. Look for the "temperature coefficient" on a solar module spec sheet.

[–] Malfeasant@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

the heat of the desert is way outside of their operating range.

I live in the Phoenix area, there are tons of solar installations here. In fact my house has solar, had it when we bought it 10 years ago, and it cuts the power bill in half.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think their approach with module is 20-50x concentration instead of 500x, with cooling permitted to be module wide on air gap, as well as usual bottom cooling.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

usual bottom cooling.

Nothing like it on a summer day.

[–] Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago

Concentrating solar cells have been around for decades, but I suppose the efficiency Fraunhofer achieved here is nothing to sneeze at.

[–] Vinstaal0@feddit.nl 2 points 9 hours ago

The issue here in NL is with the power grid, not the price of the panels. The installing of them is already one of the most expensive parts of getting panels since you need to build scafolding for most houses.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

I wonder what kind of concentrating optics they use. Simple Fresnel lenses won't do, unless you closely follow the sunlight to stay in focus.

[–] Nightsoul@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I feel like this is one of those discoveries thats like, well duh of course it would work that way

[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"Has the potential to contribute...." Wow. Amazing.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I like the understatement. Shame they spoiled it with the "game changing" claim at the beginning.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] witty_username@feddit.nl -2 points 2 days ago

SLASH THE GAME CHANGING BREAKTHROUGH

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›