this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2025
630 points (99.1% liked)

Not The Onion

17177 readers
1693 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works 109 points 1 day ago (3 children)

And you thought J. Edgar Hoover was paranoid.

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Is he short? Seems like a short kinda guy

[–] Carvex@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (9 children)

5’9”, but I can see that Short Height Indicator Type all over him, some people call it being SHITty

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Youd think all the evil would weigh him down even a touch

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 78 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Cops and pseudoscience go together like chocolate and peanut butter.

For more examples, see "bite mark analysis," "911 call analysis," "blood spatter analysis," roadside drug testing with known false-positives, and even fingerprints (once the gold standard) have up to a 20% error rate.

And that's not even getting into how their methodology is exactly backwards: they have a claim that they set out to prove, but do no work to disprove what they already believe.

[–] FUCKING_CUNO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 1 day ago

but do no work to disprove what they already believe.

But that's the LAWYERS job /s

[–] chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 day ago

I think it's only been used to convict 1 person but, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optography

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Deadeyegai@lemmy.world 62 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 7 points 21 hours ago

At least he doesn't look paranoid...

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 59 points 1 day ago (9 children)

Polygraph measures nervousness, not lies.

So innocent people fail them. And guilty people pass them.

All this does is make remaing people hate him

[–] yucandu@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (7 children)

People who use lie detectors as a machine they think can detect lies are stupid.

The real purpose of the lie detector is to trick the suspect into thinking it can detect lies, to the point where they confess.

Ancient trick. The voodoo magic chicken. "This chicken can tell all lies from truth, and it says you are lying." Who doesn't believe in voodoo magic? So the thief, knowing the jig is up, confesses.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 34 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Real leaders don't need to be paranoid about what their underlings think about them. Fascism is more fragile than it appears.

[–] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 33 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

“[Their] need for control is so desperate because it is so unnatural. Tyranny requires constant effort. It breaks, it leaks. Authority is brittle. Oppression is the mask of fear.”

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 9 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Fear and greed. Who is that quote by? It's great.

[–] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 16 points 22 hours ago

Believe it or not, it’s from the Star Wars tv series “Andor” of all places. That show was really too good for its source material.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 10 points 23 hours ago

Real leaders would take the time to understand why someone doesn’t like them, do a little self reflection to see if it’s either a valid point or just a perception issue, and then work to fix the issue if there is one. If it’s just a person who just doesn’t like them but is good at their job, just ignore it. If they are truly not a good fit or just a bad actor who just thrives in negativity, then you either find a better fit for them or then you fire them.

I’m very much a pleaser type personality but if someone doesn’t like me for whatever reason, I don’t really sweat it if it doesn’t affect me personally. Most people like me but not everyone and that’s ok. This constant need to be surrounded by yes men and sycophants is just disturbing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 27 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] HowAbt2day@futurology.today 9 points 8 hours ago

The “original” snowflakes. “I can’t drink from the same water fountain as a colored person!” Type of people.

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wouldn't FBI agents be able to pass a "lie detector" test? Has anyone told Kash they aren't actual lie detectors?

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 37 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Polygraphs have always been close to useless even for normal people. Anyone being interrogated isnyoing to be nervous and likely set them off.

However, you have to be slighlty, remotely intelligent to understand that nuance. And that is not an affliction any Trump cabinet appointee has.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 23 hours ago

Polygraphs provide authoritarians the excuse to get rid of people.

The same way that scientology uses auditing. The point is to instil fear and doubt into whomever you're measuring so that you can manipulate them.

So, they are extremely useful.

[–] toppy@lemy.lol 25 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Is polygraph test reliable ? Doesn't it fall under pseudoscience ?

[–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 22 points 12 hours ago

It is not reliable at all, and yes, it is widely considered to be psuedoscience. Yes, this is a batshit insane scenario

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Dorkyd68@lemmy.world 22 points 22 hours ago

Damn dude that's some serious trump energy

[–] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 20 points 21 hours ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bitwolf@sh.itjust.works 20 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Isn't the FBI trained to beat polygraphs though?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 20 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Good thing polygraphs are junk science that doesn't work literally at all.

[–] MNByChoice@midwest.social 14 points 20 hours ago

Good thing the system already selects for people that can pass polygraphs without much issue.
It is also junk technology.

[–] popekingjoe@lemmy.world 17 points 12 hours ago

What a dork-ass loser.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 16 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

Lol. I've lied during lie detector tests and still passed.

Hoping our FBI officials are capable of doing the same.

[–] Lumisal@lemmy.world 13 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

It'd be funnier if they passed while being as sarcastic as possible just to mess with him

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 15 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

Yes I support the United States Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic 😏

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Son_of_Macha@lemmy.cafe 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Why do none of these clowns know polygraphs don't work

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Comparing them to clowns is an insult to clowns.

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 8 points 22 hours ago

🤡 We demand to be taken seriously.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 11 points 7 hours ago

government of fragile masculinities

[–] BetaBlake@lemmy.world 10 points 21 hours ago

All these fascists are such little weeny piss babies.

And all the alpha bros look up to them, how embarrassing.

[–] burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world 9 points 8 hours ago

literally a 30 rock episode

[–] AskThinkingTim@lemmy.world 9 points 8 hours ago

Enforcing polygraph testing will invariably make people less trusting of you. There needs to specific reasons that target specific people.

[–] hellfire103@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago
[–] demizerone@lemmy.world 9 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

This is great news. This means they are think he is regarded.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 17 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

I don't think so.

They're weeding out non-loyalists because the fascism is going to be ratcheted up tremendously, and for that to happen, they need people without a conscience. True believers.

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 9 points 22 hours ago

He could also use a plethysmograph to see which male staff likes him.

NB: Polygraphs are a hilarious pseudo-science just slightly above palm reading and astrology.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Dudes a meth head

[–] skhayfa@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

A more accurate testing would be to hold his portrait and look for visible signs of disgust

load more comments
view more: next ›